Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nick Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nick Green

  • Postcode verified

    BS20 6QB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery welleffectivelyexcellentvery effectiveclearhigh expectationsthrive
Criticismnot stronglimitednot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings772w+82
  • Leadership112w+74
  • What needs to improve77w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
943
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms E Jeffery Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Bristol Road Portishead North Somerset BS20 6QB

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 March to look at work in design and technology.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The overall effectiveness of design and technology was judged to be good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

Pupils’ achievement and standards in design and technology are good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

 The standard of pupils’ work is considerably above average in both Key Stages 1 and 2. The general attainment of pupils when they enter Key Stage 2 is well above average and from this starting point their progress and achievement is good by the end of Year 6. They demonstrate a depth of knowledge and understanding of design and technology and use tools, equipment, materials and components skilfully to make good quality products.  Pupils’ capabilities in working with resistant materials, food, textiles, systems and control are of an equally high standard. An outstanding aspect of the pupils’ capability is their understanding of designing and their planning for making. They show very high level skills in investigation, research and evaluation. Their generation of a range of design ideas is not as strong though consistently good in both key stages. Pupils in some year groups also demonstrate an outstanding

p.1

Achievement and Standards

level of capability in the use of computer aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM).  Pupils clearly enjoy design and technology very much; they speak positively about its benefits and can articulate well what they have learnt. In design and technology lessons, their personal development and well-being are promoted effectively and their behaviour is excellent.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in design and technology is good with outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 The quality of teaching and learning seen in lessons in both key stages was good with outstanding features.  Lessons were planned thoroughly, teachers had clear learning objectives and they set high expectations for the standard of pupils’ work. There was a good balance of teacher exposition and pupil tasks. Resources were chosen and employed wisely. Teachers’ generic teaching skills were outstanding; explanations were clear and questioning was very effective. Pupils’ practical work was monitored thoroughly and they were given good subject-specific guidance on how to improve. Pupils’ progress and standards in lessons were never less than good and for some they were outstanding.  In both key stages pupils’ design and technology vocabulary could have been extended further by teachers and in Key Stage 2 pupils could have been challenged to develop more initial ideas.  Assessment procedures are good and ensure that pupils’ design and

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

technology capability is evaluated in each unit of work against National Curriculum levels of attainment for the subject. Suitable records are kept on pupils’ attainment. Pupils are given clear formative feedback in lessons and their work is annotated with helpful comments. This gives them a good understanding of the progress they are making in each unit of work.  Summative feedback on pupils’ attainment at the end of each unit, year and key stage is more limited as their attainment against the National Curriculum levels is not reported. Pupils were generally aware of what they needed to do to improve their capability in the subject though Year 6 pupils lacked a firm grasp of the standards they were attaining.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum in design and technology is good with outstanding features.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum

 The design and technology curriculum is organised and planned effectively. Good medium term plans ensure that the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority’s (QCA) scheme of work for the subject is implemented successfully. This is complemented by suitable units of work devised by the school. The time allocated for studying design and technology is above average, being extended through a range of other subject related work.  Pupils experience a wide range of activities that meet the requirements of the National Curriculum very well. Pupils undertake designing and making with a variety of materials, components and processes.  The outstanding features of the curriculum are: the systematic coverage of some aspects of designing; the progressive use of more demanding materials, tools and equipment; the opportunities some pupils have to develop capability in the use of CAD/CAM and the wide range of subject related activities that enrich the curriculum.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum

 Pupils also benefit considerably from undertaking activities with local secondary schools which prepare them very well for their transition to secondary design and technology work.

p.3

Leadership and Management

The leadership and management of design and technology are good.

p.3

Leadership and Management

 The subject co-ordinator has a good understanding of the nature and purpose of design and technology education. She manages the provision for the subject well and has a clear vision for developing it further. The performance of the subject is monitored effectively through work sampling, photographic records of pupils’ work and discussions with pupils.  Design and technology benefits from your effective support. The school’s broad and balanced curriculum enables the subject to thrive. Good annual reports and action plans identify suitable areas for improving the subject further. The school’s self-evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the subject is generally accurate.

p.3

Inclusion

 There are no differences in the achievement and standards of boys and girls. The school is inclusive in giving all pupils full access to the D&T curriculum. Those with learning difficulties are supported well and the curriculum enrichment activities and activities undertaken with local secondary schools provide valuable opportunities for stretching the most able pupils.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 increasing pupils’ generation of design ideas  ensuring all pupils develop knowledge and understanding of CAD/CAM by the end of Year 6  reporting more specifically to pupils their summative attainment in design and technology.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop design and technology in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion