Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alan Brine

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Brine

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 2TP

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery welloutstandingpositivehigh expectationsgood progressstrongskilfullyenjoy
Criticismweaknessesseriousunevenlimitednot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings578w+51
  • Leadership201w+42
  • What needs to improve136w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
898
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Ainsworth Headteacher Wellfield Business and Enterprise College Yewlands Drive Leyland Lancashire PR25 2TP

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 and 5 December 2006 to look at work in religious education (RE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The overall effectiveness of RE was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Students’ achievement in RE is good overall.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 While standards attained by students in RE are broadly in line with those seen nationally, the progress they make is good. The performance of students at GCSE is impressive and high relative to the pattern of their overall attainment in other subjects. Their ability to offer informed perspectives on ethical and social issues is particularly good. The pattern of students’ achievement at Key Stage 3 is more uneven. In some classes students make good and very good progress, elsewhere however progress only satisfactory. Students develop a reasonable understanding of religions and are able to express their own viewpoints and opinions. However, their ability to offer more extended consideration of religious material is limited by weaknesses in their literacy skills.  Students in RE have very good attitudes to learning and show a lively respect for the views of others. They are positive about exploring social

p.1

Achievement and standards

and moral issues. The subject makes a particularly important contribution to the students’ self confidence, their ability to work collaboratively, and to their awareness and appreciation of cultural and religious diversity.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The overall quality of teaching and learning in RE is good with some very good features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 There are many very good features of teaching in RE. Many lessons model high expectations; they are pacy, skilfully structured and very well- organised; relationships with students are good and, as a result, they enjoy the subject; and, effective use is made of lively, varied and engaging teaching strategies and resource materials to ensure participation in learning by all ability groups.  Assessment arrangements, which include some good use of self- assessment and target-setting, ensure students understand what they need to do to improve further. At its best, teaching provides students with outstanding support and encouragement enabling them to achieve very well.  Where the teaching is by non-specialists, some of the quality of learning is satisfactory rather than good. In these cases links between aspects of the learning are not consolidated effectively and, occasionally, tasks do not challenge students to think for themselves.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum in RE is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 Considerable attention has been paid to developing a curriculum which relates to the needs and interests of the students. The pattern of work across both key stages provides continuity and progression and helps ensure the good achievement. The scheme of work follows the agreed syllabus closely. There is scope to develop aspects of the medium term planning at Key Stage 3 to ensure the outcomes for each unit and lesson are more closely defined and differentiated.  The provision for RE at Key Stage 4 meets statutory requirements. The non-examination core RE curriculum has been carefully designed to match the requirements of the agreed syllabus and support the delivery of citizenship. This reflects the keen commitment of the college to ensure RE enriches students’ wider personal development. The GCSE course is very well designed and organised to ensure students are able to achieve well.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of RE are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject leader, well-supported by the senior leadership team, has carried out a very thorough evaluation of the work of the department. This is linked to a comprehensive improvement plan which is carefully integrated with the wider college plan and is sharply focused on raising achievement. As a result the capacity of the subject to improve is very good.  The subject is very well led by an outstanding subject leader; it is well well-established in the College and makes a very positive contribution to its overall priorities. The subject is currently facing staffing difficulties which are beginning to have some impact on the quality of the provision. While efforts are being made to manage these difficulties it will be important to address the issue to avoid the impact becoming more serious.

p.3

Implementation of the agreed syllabus

 The process of implementing the agreed syllabus, although not included in its current improvement plan, is well-embedded in the work of the department. Care needs to be taken with the next steps in the development of the use of the levels of attainment to extend their use in planning and to ensure the assessment process does not become over- convoluted.

p.3

Inclusion

 There is a very strong culture of inclusion in many RE lessons. Emphasis is placed on seeking to ensure the contribution and viewpoints of all students are valued. Good use is made of assessment data, particularly at Key Stage 4, to identify and support students who are under-achieving.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 to monitor carefully the impact of the use of non-specialist staffing on student achievement in RE and resolve the situation as soon as possible  to review the use made of levels of attainment to ensure these inform planning and assessment more effectively  to continue to develop the use of more varied and extended independent written work to ensure students are able to access the higher levels of attainment in RE with confidence.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the college.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and, in the case of RE, SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion