Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Apr 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eric Craven

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eric Craven

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
47
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%About the inspection 95%

Full report text

Version 1 – 6 Feb 2007 CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG ccurbishley@cfbt.com Direct Tel : 01695 566931 Direct Fax : 01695 729320

p.1

Mr J Jolley (Headteacher) Pinehurst Primary School Pinehurst Avenue Liverpool L4 7UF

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 14 March 2007, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please also pass on my thanks to the staff with whom I met and also to the two governors and the local authority representative who met with me.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

As a result of the inspection in March 2006 the school was asked to address three areas for improvement: to raise achievement, particularly in Key Stage 2; to increase the proportion of good teaching; and to improve the effectiveness of senior leaders in monitoring and evaluating the work of the school and in using the outcomes to plan for improvement.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

Since the inspection of March 2006 the school has experienced considerable instability in its senior leadership team. The deputy headteacher left the school in October 2006 and has been replaced by a substantive deputy headteacher who took up her position less than a month ago. Interim management arrangements lessened the effect of these changes, but, nevertheless, the school’s response to addressing the areas for improvement has been hampered. However, the school is now in a promising position to build more systematically and speedily on the developments it has introduced.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

The national test results in 2006 saw a modest rise in the percentage of pupils achieving the nationally expected Level 4 in English, mathematics and science. However, there was a drop in the proportion of pupils gaining Level 5 results. The school’s recently introduced tracking system and teachers’ assessments suggest that pupils are on target to surpass last year’s results in English at Level 4 and to reach the school’s target. Predictions also indicate more pupils will reach Level 5 in reading but that the school may not reach its target for Level 5 in writing. In mathematics the school’s data shows that the proportion of pupils likely to achieve Level 4 and Level 5 should increase from last year but that the school’s targets for these levels may not be achieved. The data suggests that not enough pupils in Year 2 are on track to enable the school to achieve its target of Level 2+ in reading and writing, although the

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

target should be surpassed in mathematics. Training received by teachers and teaching assistants has improved the effectiveness of programmes targeted at particular groups of pupils: they are making better progress as a result of the school’s intervention strategies. Observations during the visit show that pupils are making generally good progress in their lessons as a result of more consistently good teaching.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

The impact of work to improve the quality of teaching is beginning to emerge. Teaching observed was of good quality overall and accurately reflected the judgements of the senior leadership team. The behaviour and attitudes of the pupils are at least good and sometimes outstanding and enables them to be receptive to the learning opportunities presented. The school has improved its resources for learning. For example, new interactive white boards are used well to enliven learning. The school has taken soundings from pupils who indicate that many lessons are more interesting and motivating as a result. Training for staff is impacting positively on learning, notably mind friendly learning approaches. Subject coordinators have benefited from networking with teachers from other schools and the products of some of these associations have been successfully introduced into teaching programmes. Interventions with less able pupils are proving

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

effective and setting arrangements in Year 6 help the school appropriately match work to the needs of these pupils. However, the school’s work with the more able pupils generally is not systematically planned and is therefore not fully capitalised upon.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

Arrangements to improve the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation by senior managers are at an early stage of development. The deputy headteacher has settled into her role quickly and is already making a valuable contribution to the senior leadership team. Senior leaders are undertaking a programme of professional development to improve and systematise their monitoring and evaluation procedures. Similar training is to be given to the whole staff team. Monitoring of lessons by senior managers does identify strengths and weaknesses. However, the omission of clear judgments on the quality of teaching limits their usefulness as a management tool. The school improvement plan is underpinned by action plans for all subjects and other aspects of the school. However, planned outcomes fail to measure progress sufficiently in terms of raised attainment and improvements to the quality of teaching and learning. The school recognises these deficiencies and is

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

working closely with the local authority to introduce an ‘intensive support programme’ to draw together the strands of raising standards and improving teaching and learning and to build more rapidly upon its early work.

p.3

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH GRADE 3

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion