Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BB9 7YT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers have high expectations which they communicate very well to their students. p.2
- The proportions of students achieving grades A*-C in applied science, single science, human physiology and health, and psychology were all excellent. p.1
- In 2006 the success rates for advanced level science students of minority ethnic origin were excellent. p.1
- Highly effective use is made of individual target setting, particularly at advanced level. p.2
- Results for GCSE science courses in 2006 were outstanding. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science courses in the college. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment10
“Teachers have high expectations which they communicate very well to their students.” p.2Progress & outcomes8
“Results for GCSE science courses in 2006 were outstanding.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 899
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Dr Alison Birkinshaw Principal Nelson and Colne College Scotland Road Nelson Lancashire BB9 7YT
p.1
Sector Skills Area: 2 Science post-16
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 2 and 3 October 2006. I am particularly grateful to for all the hard work put into preparing the programme and background documentation and the great deal of time given by staff during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to all the staff and learners who gave up their time to talk to me.
p.1
Sector Skills Area: 2 Science post-16
The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in science. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All college letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Sector Skills Area: 2 Science post-16
The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observation of lessons.
p.1
Sector Skills Area: 2 Science post-16
I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in the sciences and to suggest some areas for development.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Overall the results for GCE A level science subjects were very good in 2006. Physics, chemistry and biology all had particularly high success rates. Overall the results for GCE AS level science subjects were very good in 2006. Success rates were particularly high in chemistry, biology and psychology. Results for GCSE science courses in 2006 were outstanding. Retention rates for all science GCSE courses were high. The proportions of students achieving grades A*-C in applied science, single science, human physiology and health, and psychology were all excellent. In 2006 the success rates for advanced level science students of minority ethnic origin were excellent. They were well above those for white British students. The performance of students of minority ethnic origin on level 2 courses in 2006 was similar to that of white British students. Students’ attendance is very good.
p.1
Quality of provision
Teaching and learning in science are very good. Lessons include a very good range of interesting activities which motivate students, help them to develop their skills, knowledge and understanding, and involve them effectively in their own learning. Teachers use question and answer techniques very well. Directed questions are used to check prior knowledge and understanding, involve all students, and encourage students to think. A brisk pace is maintained in lessons encouraging students to maintain attention, stay focused and work productively throughout. No time is wasted, and skilful teacher interventions keep students on task. Good use is made of ICT in teaching and learning. For example, electronic whiteboards are used well in lessons in different ways to enhance learning. Lesson planning is thorough, and includes strategies for differentiation which are implemented well in lessons. For example, teachers provide
p.2
Quality of provision
additional work for those who complete tasks quickly, and target weaker students for extra help in lessons. Learning materials are of high quality. Teachers have high expectations which they communicate very well to their students. Students are well supported and encouraged, but challenged to produce work to the very best of their ability. Assessment practices are well developed and effective. In lessons teachers are adept at using different techniques such as student whiteboards, electronic voting systems, and verbal dominoes. Marking is constructive, with comments that help students understand what they need to do to improve their work and grades. Highly effective use is made of individual target setting, particularly at advanced level. Progress monitoring by subject teachers is thorough, and underachievers are effectively targeted for additional help. Extremely good use is made of subject support workshops. Students
p.2
Quality of provision
who are at risk of not achieving their target grades are directed to attend and other students can attend voluntarily. In workshops difficult topics are revised, and students receive individual help. There are effective systems for monitoring overall student progress through the tutorial system.
p.2
Leadership and management
Leadership and management demonstrate a strong focus on student achievement, and a student centred approach to addressing any issues and problems that arise. The college has an inclusive ethos and culture. It provides a harmonious learning environment for students from different backgrounds and cultures. Effective use is made of data to analyse performance by age, gender, ethnicity and disadvantage. Self assessment is particularly effective. There is a rigorous approach to identifying all weaknesses. Action plans to address these are thorough, detailed and realistic. There is a culture of continuous improvement, which is communicated successfully. Staff at all levels are committed to improving their practice for the benefit of their students.
p.3
Areas for development, which we discussed, included:
improve retention rates for GCE AS level chemistry and physics which were below national averages in 2005 and 2006 improve the results for GCE A level psychology which in 2006 were not as good as in the previous two years; pass rates and success rates in 2006 were similar to national averages, whereas in 2004 and 2005 they were high further develop the use of value added analyses to highlight aspects of student achievement relative to prior attainment.
p.3
Areas for development, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science courses in the college.
p.3
Areas for development, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion