Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    EX15 1DX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityeffectiveexcellenthigh expectationsoutstandingmake good progressgood progresseager

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
831
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs C Dunne Principal Cullompton Community College Exeter Road Cullompton Devon EX15 1DX

p.1

Education (PSHE)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 08 January 2007 to look at work in PSHE and citizenship. As outlined in my initial letter, my visit also looked at the college’s approach to healthy eating.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our evaluation and reporting. Any published report is likely to list the names of the institutions visited, but we would not identify individual institutions within the report itself.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements I made included: interviews with members of the senior management team, the coordinators for citizenship, for PE and for CEG, Year 10 students, and the catering manager, scrutiny of school documentation, analysis of pupils’ work, and observation of a lesson.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

I undertook to provide a brief written version of the main points made in my feedback at the end of the visit, to support development in, PSHE and CEG.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The overall effectiveness was judged to be good.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

 Students are developing their subject knowledge and understanding and make good progress as they move through the college.  They are able to reflect on and discuss their understanding of issues and show respect for the feelings and views of others. They are right in their view that this contributes to the good relationships that exist in the college as they show interest in and respect for the views of others. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk The personal development and well-being of the students is good.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

 Students have a good understanding of the importance of a healthy lifestyle.  As they move through the college they are developing an appropriate level of understanding of sexual health risks and of drugs and their effects.  Students feel safe. They report that the college responds appropriately to any issues of bullying.  Students make very good use of the resources and advice available to them in the school to make decisions about their future.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

 Teachers’ lesson planning is good and is based on the detailed guidance provided by the subject coordinator. Lessons set high expectations of the students. They proceed at a good pace with effective use made of a range of appropriate teaching methods that include paired and group work as well as general discussions. The students respond enthusiastically and are eager participants in all aspects of their learning.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

The quality of assessment is satisfactory.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

 Assessment practice is less well developed in aspects of PSHE; more progress has been made in assessment of citizenship.  The quality of marking and feedback to the students is good.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

 The overall curriculum for, PSHE and CEG is well matched to the needs of the students. The programme is planned effectively and provides continuity and progression of learning.  The evaluation of the programme will need to determine whether the time allocated to topics is sufficient for effective learning to take place  The school has made a good start to its planning for healthy schools status.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

The quality of support and guidance for the students is outstanding.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

 The roles of tutors and heads of year are clearly defined. Students receive very good care and support.  The careers education guidance programme is good. Students feel they are able to access high quality advice and support that fully meets their needs.  The college has established excellent links with a range of external agencies who are making effective contributions to students’ health and well-being.

p.2

Education (PSHE)

Subject leadership and management are satisfactory.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

 The coordinators have reviewed and written high quality guidance for the tutors.  Statutory requirements are met.  Monitoring and evaluation of provision are satisfactory: tutors might be encouraged to evaluate the effectiveness of aspects of the programme in meeting the needs of the students.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

 The college is making very good progress towards meeting the new food standards required for school meals.  The choice of meals is good. Students select healthy meals and enjoy the social opportunity that lunch gives them.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

 The students feel that everyone in the college is valued. Relationships between students and with the staff are good. Teaching and learning and the high quality curriculum are well matched to the needs of the students.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

p.3

Education (PSHE)

 considering the possibility of one member of the senior leadership team line managing all the coordinators working in this area  ensuring all relevant policies are in place, up to date and based on the most recent national advice  identifying opportunities for parents to sample the range of healthy foods available in the college.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE in the school.

p.3

Education (PSHE)

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion