Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barbara Wintersgill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Barbara Wintersgill

  • Postcode verified

    TR27 4AH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentexceptionallyvery effectivegood progressstrongmake good progressenthusiasm
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings361w+92
  • Leadership161w+73
  • What needs to improve74w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
576
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Hodson Headteacher Penpol Community Primary School St George's Road Hayle Cornwall TR27 4AH

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 15 November 2006 to look at work in religious education (RE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The overall effectiveness of RE was judged to be good with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

Achievement and standards are good with outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

 Standards are high in relation to ‘learning about religion’ and outstanding in relation to ‘learning from religion’.  Pupils make at least good progress. This is a result of their enthusiasm for the subject that results from stimulating teaching under strong leadership.  Pupils like RE and this is confirmed by the school’s monitoring.  The subject makes an outstanding contribution to pupils’ personal development. RE is used a vehicle to promote positive values, particularly those that contribute to self-esteem, inter-personal relationships and community identity and cohesion.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in RE is good with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Pupils’ make good progress and attitudes are a direct result of the quality of teaching.  Teachers are not afraid to take risks and use innovative teaching styles to promote the underlying aims and values of the subject.  There is very good support for all pupils and exceptionally good involvement of parents in their children’s learning.  An outstanding feature is the inventive use of art and ICT in the presentation of work.  The quality of assessment is good with the potential to be outstanding. The new planning and assessment leaflets inform parents well and seek their views. They clarifying learning objectives, support self-assessment and provide feedback on the quality of work.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The subject leader has set a good example, followed by other staff, of using a range of engaging teaching and learning activities to make the curriculum appropriate for the interests and aspirations of pupils.  The long term planning is designed in a way that allows pupils to build soundly on what they have already done.  There is good provision for the basic skills of literacy and ICT.  Curriculum planning includes unusually detailed links with the ‘every child matters’ learning outcomes.

p.2

Leadership and Management

Leadership and management of the subject are good with outstanding features.  There is a clearly articulated purpose and ethos for the subject that focuses on its contribution to raising standards as well as promoting personal development and encouraging community links.  The subject leader monitors planning and the resulting quality of pupils’ work. She has instigated some excellent practice such as maintaining a file of evidence of marked work.  Links with parents are outstanding and the school uses simple but unusually rigorous procedures to elicit their views on the subject.

p.2

Implementation of the Agreed Syllabus

 The process of implementing the agreed syllabus has been very effective. The subject leader has a clear understanding of the main changes in the agreed syllabus after attending the local authority’s dissemination programme. The process of implementation has been incorporated within an improvement plan. A careful self-evaluation is being undertaken of the strengths and weaknesses of the current provision to identify how the new syllabus can support improvement.

p.3

Inclusion

 Inclusion is good and no group of pupils underachieves, although there is potential to raise the achievement of the most able.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 to build up exemplars of assessed work for each level and across year groups  to develop the use of the planning and assessment sheets so that all pupils can be more appropriately challenged.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion