Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Wilson
- Postcode verified
DH1 4SU
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school. p.3
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 826
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs C Roberts Headteacher Durham Johnston Comprehensive School Crossgate Moor County Durham DH1 4SU
p.1
Ofsted 2006-07 survey inspection programme – mathematics
Thank you very much for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 2 and 3 November 2006 to look at work in mathematics. As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on students’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics.
p.1
Ofsted 2006-07 survey inspection programme – mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Ofsted 2006-07 survey inspection programme – mathematics
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and the observation of five lessons.
p.1
Ofsted 2006-07 survey inspection programme – mathematics
The overall effectiveness of mathematics was judged to be satisfactory with some good features .
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
From an above average standard on entry to Year 7, students made good progress with standards in 2005 significantly above average by the end of Year 9. Preliminary results of the 2006 national Year 9 tests indicate a greater proportion of students gained Level 5 and above. At GCSE in 2005, students attained standards which were above average. This represented broadly satisfactory progress having entered Year 7 with above average standards. Early indications from the 2006 GCSE results show the percentage of A* to C grades have increased slightly. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk More able students studying GCSE statistics in 2005 attained significantly higher- than-average standards. Initial indications of the 2006 results show the percentage of A*-C grades gained in statistics was still high but slightly less than in 2005. Students’ personal development in mathematics lessons is good, with most
p.1
Achievement and standards
students behaving well and showing appropriate attitudes to learning. They generally relate well to each other, respect staff, and develop personal qualities securely.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Teaching and learning are satisfactory with some good features.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
A positive feature of some lessons was the good opportunities taken by the teacher to develop students’ learning through the use of games and puzzles. Teachers are experienced; they have a good understanding of mathematics and generally have a good rapport with students. However, there is a need for teachers to plan for and develop the repertoire of teaching and learning approaches used to engage students. Also, teachers do not use assessment data when planning their lessons to ensure each student receives the appropriate level of challenge or support. Overall, the quality of assessment is satisfactory. Whilst students generally know their current and target level or grade, they are not clear on how to improve. Some students have not yet developed skills as independent learners. The regular setting of homework does go some way to improving this situation for most students.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
In Years 10 and 11, a modular course has recently been started to meet more fully students’ needs. Higher ability students are able to study GCSE statistics, whilst those in the sixth form can study further mathematics. However, whilst schemes of work are in place they have not yet been sufficiently developed to fully support teaching. Using and applying mathematics is not a sufficiently developed feature of lessons, especially in Years 7 and 8 with students’ progress in this area not sufficiently monitored. This does not help students develop the necessary skills.
p.2
Leadership and management
Leadership and management are satisfactory .
p.2
Leadership and management
The head of department has established a stable cohesive teaching team and good arrangements are in place to ensure a smooth transition for primary pupils joining Year 7. The students benefit from regular assessments. However, whilst the resulting assessment data is recorded, systems are not sufficiently well developed, especially in Years 7 to 9, to highlight students’ progress. Similarly target-setting arrangements for individual students in these years are not sufficiently rigorous. Some monitoring of teaching takes place but does not focus sufficiently upon learning and the progress made by students. Department self review is carried out at a basic level but does not fully evaluate the effectiveness of the department’s work.
p.2
Subject issue: students’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics
Overall, students say they enjoy their lessons more in the sixth form than they do in Years 7 to 11. Students cite their enjoyment of lessons to be dependent upon which teacher they have. Students get least enjoyment when too much time is spent working through text books or when teachers do not ensure their learning needs are met. Most students are able to see the links between various areas of mathematics and understand how to draw on their previous learning to help solve problems.
p.3
Inclusion
Inclusion is satisfactory overall with some good features; for example, the good progress students make in Key Stage 3 and in Years 12 and 13. However, in Years 10 and 11, middle ability students achieved less well in 2005 than their peers and higher ability students did less well in their coursework. The monitoring of students’ progress to identify and plan for their needs has not been sufficiently developed.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing teachers’ use of assessment data in lesson planning to meet students’ individual learning needs and in monitoring progress widening the repertoire of teaching and learning approaches used to engage students and meet their learning needs, especially in their use and application of mathematics improving the quality of feedback students receive on their work and progress in order they are clear on how to improve to achieve their potential.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion