Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    PR8 6JS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellwell supportedstrengthseffectivelysensitiveclear
Criticismlackweaknessinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings345w+16
  • Leadership118w+18
  • What needs to improve71w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
522
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Mrs Alison Heaton Headteacher Meols Cop High School Meols Cop Road Southport Merseyside PR8 6JS

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Citizenship

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 18 and 19 September 2006 to look at work in citizenship.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Citizenship

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on provision for teaching and learning about Britain’s diversity.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Citizenship

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Citizenship

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of nine lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Citizenship

The overall effectiveness was judged to be satisfactory, with some good features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards in citizenship are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils demonstrated good understanding of some aspects of the citizenship curriculum, but overall their knowledge is patchy.  The lack of assessment in citizenship makes it difficult for staff to identify progress within and between key stages and the school is right to seek to develop this. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Lessons encourage discussion and debate and pupils have well-developed oral skills of enquiry and communication. However, extended writing is rare, except where pupils are studying citizenship through other subjects.  The school council is well developed and effective and many pupils participate in community activities within and beyond the school.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers demonstrate good knowledge and use a range of relevant and topical resources including effective use of information and communications technology.  Teachers deal very well with sensitive and controversial issues, adopting clear and respected class rules which allow pupils to express their opinions with confidence.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school has provided a programme which meets the requirements and incorporates the three strands of the national curriculum, but it is inconsistent in depth and breadth.  Locating citizenship in the personal and social development (PSD) programme has led to a lack of coherence in the programme of study.

p.2

Leadership and management of citizenship

 The coordinator, who was recently appointed as an advanced skills teacher for citizenship, provides good leadership which includes comprehensive planning materials and effective CPD for teaching staff. She is well supported by the senior management team.  The school is well aware of its strengths and development needs in the provision of citizenship. Self evaluation documents have highlighted all the main areas of weakness and proposed suitable plans for improvement.

p.2

diversity

There is not a planned programme to address Britain’s diversity, however pupils explore multiculturalism, prejudice, diversity, customs and cultures in PSD; the history of immigration and stereotypical images of the United Kingdom in geography; the range of religious faiths in RE, and migration and tolerance in history.

p.2

Inclusion

Teachers plan effectively for the range of pupils they teach and all pupils engage well with the lessons. They are all helped to develop their knowledge and skills in citizenship and to participate in school and wider community activities. However, opportunities for pupils to enhance and develop their citizenship knowledge at Key Stage 4 depends on their option choices as much of the learning takes place in other subjects such as history, geography and business studies.

p.3

Inclusion

There are no teaching assistants allocated to citizenship lessons within the PSD programme, even where pupils’ needs have been identified.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 to develop the assessment of citizenship  to deepen the curriculum, particularly at Key Stage 4.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion