Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anne Looney
- Postcode verified
NW9 9ND
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop modern languages in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“There was insufficient use in the lesson of the target language by the teacher.” p.2Communication & language7
“There was insufficient use in the lesson of the target language by the teacher.” p.2Staff development2
“She has also identified immediate training needs.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 475
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms P Young Acting Headteacher Kingsbury Green Primary School Old Kenton Lane Kingsbury LONDON NW9 9ND
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Modern languages
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 21 September to look at work in modern languages.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Modern languages
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on implementing languages entitlement.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Modern languages
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Modern languages
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation and observation of independent pupils work using modern language software and one lesson.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Modern languages
The overall effectiveness of modern languages (ML) was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory considering the short length of time that pupils have learned or have been learning a modern language.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Progress in speaking and listening is satisfactory but it is not possible to judge either achievement or standards in reading or writing as these skills have not been taught in any extended way. Pupils listen well and repeat accurately. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk Pupils’ response is positive and those higher attaining pupils who took part in the computer based learning project were able to identify how it had helped them learn.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning of modern languages
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of modern languages
In the one lesson observed the teacher planned effectively for the development of language learning skills and provided a range of practice activities. The technology used did not support learning in terms of the clarity of pronunciation of the more difficult words. There was insufficient use in the lesson of the target language by the teacher.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
A range of curricular models and have been trialled and some effective use has been made of the QCA schemes of work and of the Key Stage 2 Framework in the most recent plans. There is not, however, a coherent school-wide planned programme. Insufficient attention has been paid to how pupils will be assessed.
p.2
Leadership and management of modern languages
The quality of leadership and management of the teacher who is coordinating modern languages is satisfactory.
p.2
Leadership and management of modern languages
The teacher coordinating modern languages has made an appropriate start in auditing both the teaching that has taken place in the school and the linguistic competence of the teachers. She has also identified immediate training needs. Action planning indicates a range of good ideas but is not underpinned by a rationale for school-wide provision.
p.2
Implementing languages entitlement
Progress towards entitlement is just satisfactory.
p.2
Implementing languages entitlement
The school has not yet analysed the impact of the range of modern language learning that is taking place and decided on a strategic direction for the subject. There is a commitment to the subject and the school has the capacity to make progress in implementing entitlement.
p.2
Inclusion
There are plans for all pupils in Key Stage 2 to be involved but it is too early to judge outcomes.
p.3
Areas for improvement
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the development of a rationale for the school which has:
p.3
Areas for improvement
a clear curriculum plan the identification of training needs a strategy to ensure sustainability.
p.3
Areas for improvement
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop modern languages in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion