Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PO11 0NU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrengthsecureconsistent
Criticismabsencelack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings572w+20
  • Leadership166w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
714
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%Leadership 22%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Bullough Headteacher The Hayling College Church Road Hayling Island Hampshire PO11 0NU Dear Mr Bullough

p.1

Secondary Schools

Thank you for the hospitality and your staff’s co-operation, particularly Mrs Calvert, during my visit on 16 October 2006 to look at your work in promoting attendance.

p.1

Secondary Schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Secondary Schools

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff, pupils, and representatives from the local authority; scrutiny of relevant documentation; and observation of two parts of lessons.

p.1

Secondary Schools

The overall effectiveness of your work in promoting attendance was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The school has made modest but steady progress each year, for a number of years, in reducing its overall rate of absence. A like-for-like comparison for the current term with the 2005/6 academic year shows further improvement.  For the few pupils tracked on the inspection, levels of engagement and achievement were at least satisfactory and in many cases good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 A good range of measures is taken to emphasise to pupils, parents and staff the links between attendance and pupil achievement.  The school has made the development of personalised learning and associated teaching strategies a major focus of its development activities.  Relationships between staff and pupils are mainly good, although there are significant variations between members of staff in terms of supporting pupils when they return to lessons after a period of absence.  A good range of learning and personal support is provided to those with the greatest difficulties.  In the two lessons seen, the pupils with attendance problems were effectively engaged with the work of the class. The quality of teaching and learning was good.

p.1

Quality of curriculum

 The quality of the curriculum in supporting attendance is good.  The school has substantially expanded the range of activities offered at Key Stage 4, including part-time attendance at college and work experience placements. This has enabled more customised packages to be put together to meet pupils’ individual needs.

p.2

Leadership and management of attendance

 Leadership and management in relation to attendance are good.  Attendance and achievement are now very much treated as part of an integral whole when planning and reviewing provision, both for individual pupils and within the school more generally.  Individual pupil attendance is monitored regularly and both the planning and review of action to secure improvement are good.  The school records very detailed information on pupil attendance, although continuing problems with establishing an electronic registration system have hampered both the collection and analysis of data.  An appropriate range of rewards and sanctions is used to encourage good attendance, both for pupils and parents.  A number of steps are taken to invite pupil views on how the school operates, although some pupils lack confidence that their views have much influence on decision making.  There is effective support to ease the transition from primary school

p.2

Leadership and management of attendance

for pupils identified as potentially vulnerable.  Liaison with other agencies, including other schools, is a strength.

p.2

Inclusion

 The provision for inclusion in relation to attendance is good  Nearly all the pupils interviewed said that there was at least one member of staff who took a particular interest in their well-being and progress.  Nearly all said similarly that there was at least one person who they could approach with confidence about any problems.  Effective steps are taken to address any bullying.  There are a number of sources of personal support for pupils with problems.

p.2

included:

 using the detailed attendance information available to compare pupil attendance at the lessons of individual members of staff and across the different academic subjects  establishing a more consistent approach amongst teaching staff to the support of pupils returning to class after a period of absence.

p.3

included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your attendance work in the school.

p.3

included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion