Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Brown

  • Postcode verified

    HR1 1LS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell designedeffectiveimprovedsupportivepositive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings528w+76
  • What needs to improve80w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
600
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Mr Ian Peake Principal Herefordshire College of Technology Folly Lane Hereford HR1 1LS

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 06 and 07 March 2007. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work that took place to prepare for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

This visit is part of a series to provision in SSA 5 graded good or better at its most recent inspection, in order to evaluate how effective/good practice has been brought about, further improved and sustained. The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in construction. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All letters, following survey visits, will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: lesson observations; interviews with staff and learners; scrutiny of the examples of good practice provided including a tour of resources. I agreed to provide a summary of the observations of good practice seen and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed

 The good development of provision. The college has introduced a foundation course in construction for learners that otherwise would not have had the opportunity to experience construction related activities. All learners are assessed as operating at either entry level 3 or level 1. Learners are taught foundation skills alongside vocational skills and are encouraged to address basic literary needs in a supportive environment.  The good practical teaching in carpentry and brickwork. Practical tasks are well designed and are sufficiently complex to challenge learners. In many lessons teachers carefully select learners to work in pairs. Learners with Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk developed practical skills are often paired with learners needing support, although, over time learners are expected to work with all their peers. Team-

p.1

Good practice observed

work amongst learners is well developed and the standard of practical work produced is good.  The good tracking and monitoring of learner progress. Learner tracking sheets are on display in all workshops. They are up-dated on a regular basis. Tracking sheets are used as a starting point when discussing learner progress and inform, for example, work-based learner reviews.  The well considered planning for new accommodation. Teachers and technicians have been extensively involved with relocating provision to temporary accommodation and in planning the new accommodation. Temporary workshops have been modeled on layouts and sizes of the proposed new build enabling teachers to consider solutions to difficulties as they arise.  The positive promotion of apprenticeships for full-time learners. Expectations are that full-time learners will progress to apprenticeship programmes after completing their course. The work based learning co-ordinator works well

p.2

Good practice observed

with employers to recruit learners to apprenticeships that have completed the full-time course. Of the 60 learners completing foundation courses in 2005-06, 48 have returned on apprenticeship programmes.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 to provide more realistic working conditions for learners on carpentry and joinery courses  to improve the retention of learners on the intermediate construction award in painting and decorating for part-time learners.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop construction provision in the college.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion