Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Joyce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Joyce

  • Postcode verified

    PE1 4DZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 98% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveexcellentvery effectiveeffectivewell plannedimprovedeffectivelysuccessfully

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings708w+92
  • What needs to improve116w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
809
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 48
Average sentence
26 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Don Lawson Principal Peterborough Regional College Park Crescent Peterborough PE1 4DZ

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 02 and 03 November 2006. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work that took place to prepare for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

This visit is part of a series to provision in SSA 5 graded good or better at its most recent inspection, in order to evaluate how effective/good practice has been brought about, further improved and sustained. The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in construction. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All letters, following survey visits, will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: lesson observations; interviews with staff and learners; scrutiny of the examples of good practice provided including a tour of resources. I agreed to provide a summary of the observations of good practice seen and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed included:

 the flexible approach to course delivery and assessment; innovative timetabling maximises access to assessment and resources throughout the year  assessment scheduling is very effective with good internal verification practice  the carefully considered and highly effective curriculum management structure; roles and responsibilities of staff are very clearly defined and communication is good  the very good support for new staff; this includes a significantly reduced timetable in the first tem, the allocation of an experienced curriculum colleague as a mentor, a well planned and thorough induction programme and the close management of progress and development by the curriculum area manager  the very good quality teaching and learning material used in electrical installation; learning materials are well produced and information learning technology (ILT) is used effectively; staff have successfully developed ideas from the ‘standards unit’ teaching and learning

p.1

Good practice observed included:

resources and applied these to their own teaching  the approach to the integration of key skills; vocationally relevant assignments with course specific assessment tasks are well produced with clear assessment criteria; key skills are developed alongside vocational skills by curriculum teachers supported by key skill specialists  the excellent integration of work-based learning into the curriculum and its inclusion in a comprehensive quality assurance programme; work-based learners are managed by curriculum staff who have responsibility for all aspects of framework completion; work-based assessment and review are included in the quality assurance process  the highly effective use of assessment in the workplace; dedicated assessors frequently observe learners in the workplace; learners have good access to assessors and a substantial amount of evidence is generated by direct observation within the workplace

p.2

Good practice observed included:

 the good provision for 14-16 year olds; there are beneficial links with local schools including joint delivery of construction qualifications with two schools; courses are appropriate and give a valuable insight into construction careers and enable learners to gain a basic qualification; progression rates onto post-16 construction courses are good, especially to professional courses  the highly effective use of an advanced practitioner to improve the quality of provision; a significant proportion of time is allocated for a range of activities designed to improve provision and practice; this includes; coaching, mentoring and staff development; and quality audits to monitor adherence to college policy and awarding body requirements  the good development of courses to meet the needs and interests of local and regional employers and communities; this includes the successful development of an English for speakers of other languages

p.2

Good practice observed included:

(ESOL) qualification in a construction context and courses to enable accreditation for migrant workers through the construction skills certification scheme (CSCS)  the effective links with employers and manufacturers through the construction centre of vocational excellence (CoVE); these links enhance the curriculum by providing opportunities for learners to visit working sites and use industry standard materials and equipment in training and assessment.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 to improve the monitoring and tracking of learner progress so to avoid over-reliance on paper-based portfolio tracking systems  to develop further, across the curriculum, the use of different teaching methods, including the use of ILT to enable learners to play a more active role in their lessons  to improve tutorial provision to get a more consistent approach which includes the broader aspects of a tutorial entitlement.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop construction provision in the college.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion