Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Sept 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 3
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −5Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praiseeffectivegood progresswell-plannedstrongstrengthsimprovedenthusiastictimely
    Criticismweakweaknessesinadequate

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    3
    Words of findings
    677
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Very hard
    Flesch 29, typical 45
    Average sentence
    17 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    5%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Ofsted and the ALI have particular duties in relation to colleges where their inspection report indicates that individual curriculum and/or work-based learning (WBL) areas are unsatisfactory or very weak or where leadership and management are unsatisfactory or very weak. Where a college has been judged to have less than satisfactory leadership and management, or less than satisfactory provision in solely WBL, inspectors from Ofsted or the ALI will visit the college to carry out monitoring inspections of the less than satisfactory areas. As a result of the re-inspection monitoring visits, inspectors may judge that previously less than satisfactory areas of provision, or leadership and management, are now satisfactory and that no further visits are required. Where leadership and management are satisfactory, but there is curriculum provision that is less than satisfactory, there will be no monitoring visits. All less than satisfactory provision will be re-inspected,

    p.1

    normally during one week, within two years of the original inspection.

    p.1

    Outcome of Re-Inspection

    The overall provision in the curriculum area of literacy and numeracy is now good .

    p.1

    Background

    Langdon College was inspected in January 2003. Inspectors from the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory or better in all areas inspected, except in the literacy and numeracy curriculum area which was found to be less than satisfactory.

    p.1

    Background

    If, after approximately 24 months, the college has not made sufficient progress to justify a judgement that the curriculum or WBL area or leadership and management are satisfactory, the original grade for the area that continues to be unsatisfactory will remain on the college's record until the next full inspection within the cycle. Ofsted will inform the local LSC that provision remains unsatisfactory and the reasons why.

    p.1

    Date of the Re-Inspection

    In accordance with the above procedures, re-inspection of literacy and numeracy took place on 7 to 10 February 2005.

    p.1

    Literacy and numeracy

    In the January 2003 inspection, the quality of overall provision in this area was judged to be unsatisfactory. The following strengths and weaknesses were identified in the inspection report

    p.1

    Strengths

    • effective relationships promote students' confidence

    p.2

    Strengths

    • good progress in communication skills.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • imprecise identification and recording of progress

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • inadequate integration of literacy and numeracy across the extended curriculum.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    Following the re-inspection, inspectors judged that progress has been made in addressing the above weaknesses and that overall the provision in this area is now good .

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    Learning is planned thoroughly and is linked to the outcomes of a detailed initial assessment. All students undergo a six-week induction during which both initial and diagnostic assessments are completed. The results of these assessments form the basis of each student's individual learning plan. All lesson plans and schemes of work identify targets for literacy, numeracy and communications for each student. These targets have been drawn directly from the individual learning plan and are cross-referenced to the national core curriculum. This is not the case for the two students attending the local further education college.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    The quality of teaching has improved. Most teaching is now good or better, with no unsatisfactory teaching. Teachers and students make very good use of information and communication technology in lessons. Students are enthusiastic and fully engaged, and most are appropriately challenged.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    The identification and recording of progress is thorough and timely. A new system for measuring and monitoring achievement was piloted in 2003/04 and fully implemented from September 2004. Students are set targets each term and these are measured, recorded and reviewed every two weeks. Tutors keep good records and students regularly consider their progress.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    Literacy, numeracy and communication are fully integrated across the college curriculum, including the extended curriculum. Opportunities to reinforce and consolidate learning are well-planned and monitored. There is strong, effective curriculum leadership for literacy and numeracy. There will be no further re-inspection of the college because there are no remaining unsatisfactory areas.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

    p.3

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion