Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Sept 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 3
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −45Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Praiseexcellenteffectivestrengthsimprovedpromptly
    Criticismweakweaknessespoornot excellentinsufficientlylackinsufficientlow

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    3
    Words of findings
    634
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Very hard
    Flesch 29, typical 45
    Average sentence
    18 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    11%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Ofsted and the ALI have particular duties in relation to colleges where their inspection report indicates that individual curriculum and/or work-based learning (WBL) areas are unsatisfactory or very weak or that leadership and management are unsatisfactory or very weak. Where a college has been judged to have less than satisfactory provision in any curriculum or WBL area, or less than satisfactory leadership and management, Ofsted or the ALI will visit the college to carry out monitoring inspections of the unsatisfactory areas. As a result of the re-inspection monitoring visits, inspectors may judge that the curriculum or WBL areas, or leadership and management are satisfactory and that no further visits are required. Where leadership and management are satisfactory, all unsatisfactory provision will be re-inspected normally during one week.

    p.1

    Outcome of Re-Inspection

    The overall provision in the curriculum area hairdressing and beauty therapy is now satisfactory.

    p.1

    Background

    Kingston College was inspected in February 2002. Inspectors from the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory in all areas inspected, except in hairdressing and beauty therapy which was found to be unsatisfactory.

    p.1

    Background

    If, after approximately 24 months, the college has not made sufficient progress to justify a judgement that the curriculum or WBL area or leadership and management are satisfactory, the original grade for the area that continues to be unsatisfactory will remain on the college's record until the next full inspection within the cycle. Ofsted will inform the local LSC that provision remains unsatisfactory and the reasons why.

    p.1

    Date of the Re-Inspection Monitoring Visits

    In accordance with the above procedures, re-inspection monitoring visits of hairdressing and beauty therapy, took place on 15 to 16 October 2002, 6 to 7 March 2003 and 11 to 12 December 2003.

    p.1

    Hairdressing and Beauty Therapy

    In the February 2002 inspection, the quality of overall provision in this area was judged to be unsatisfactory. The following strengths and weaknesses were identified in the inspection report:

    p.1

    Strengths

    • high retention and pass rates on part-time beauty therapy courses

    p.2

    Strengths

    • effective monitoring of beauty therapy students' progress

    p.2

    Strengths

    • wide range of complementary studies for students.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • low pass rates on NVQ level 2 courses in hairdressing

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • unsuitable specialist accommodation and resources

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • poor management of hairdressing and beauty therapy courses

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • insufficiently thorough quality assurance

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    • students' poor attendance and lack of punctuality on NVQ courses.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    Following the re-inspection monitoring visits, inspectors judged that progress has been made in addressing the above weaknesses and that overall provision in this area is now satisfactory.

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    Teaching is satisfactory overall. On the final visit, there was a good proportion of lessons graded good. The percentage of satisfactory or better teaching is just above the national average, but no very good or excellent teaching was seen. There has been a notable improvement in pass rates on almost all courses. The monitoring of students' attendance is leading to some improved punctuality, and attendance problems are promptly addressed. However, during the final re-inspection monitoring visit, attendance was low at only 70%. The new management structure is effective and the head of curriculum has developed the hairdressing and beauty therapy area to a satisfactory standard. There has been a satisfactory improvement in quality assurance procedures, including, for example, lesson observations and course reviews. The new building provides some excellent facilities. However, some refurbished rooms in the original area remain too small for the number of

    p.2

    Weaknesses

    students in the classes and there are sometimes insufficient facilities available for a whole class to participate in practical sessions.

    p.3

    Weaknesses

    There will be no further monitoring visits to the college because there are no remaining unsatisfactory areas.

    p.3

    Weaknesses

    commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted web site (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

    p.3

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion