Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rhys Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rhys Evans

  • Postcode verified

    WA10 3AG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityexcellenthigh expectationseffectivestrengthssuccessfulclearclearly
Criticismerrorsyet tolimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings619w+62
  • What needs to improve157w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
760
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Rob Peacock Principal Carmel College Prescot Road St Helens Merseyside WA10 3AG

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 1 and 2 November 2006. I am particularly grateful to your staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during my visit. Please pass on my thanks to learners who gave up their time to talk to me.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in business and administration. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observation of five lessons together with a Young Enterprise session and short visits to two further lessons.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in business and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed

 High quality provision being maintained in the business area.  Students’ achievements are very good and generally compare favourable with national averages. Action has been taken to address underperformance in AS accounting in 2005 which also had an effect on the high grade achievement in 2006.  Students benefit from and appreciate high quality teaching. They experience a variety of approaches in lessons; a good mix of teacher input, student activity and directed study, all enriched by current business examples to illustrate the theory taught.  Assignments and assessments are carefully marked and, with few exceptions, students get detailed and informative feedback. However, spelling errors often remain uncorrected.  Students’ progress is regularly and closely monitored. Students minimum expected grade, informed by their prior attainment, is judiciously used to encourage them to achieve their potential. Students

p.1

Good practice observed

are required to re-do work which falls below the standard expected. Their course files are regularly inspected by staff which is a particularly effective means of identifying those who need further support.  ILT is used to enhance learning. The new whiteboards are often used to good effect but some staff have yet to utilise them to their full potential.  Course information is detailed, high quality and easily accessible to students either through the college intranet or on a pen drive given to applied A level students.  The distinction between applied A level and A level business studies is clear. The former has a practical dimension where students are required to relate the theory taught at each stage to practical applications. The A level business is taught much more as a classroom based academic subject.  Staff have high expectations of students. They communicate them clearly throughout the course. Quality and high standards are woven

p.2

Good practice observed

into the business ethos of how the department operates. This is reflected in, for example, expectations of punctuality, attendance, quality of learning materials provided to students and, reciprocally, the quality of work students are expected to produce.  There is excellent leadership of the business team. There is a good balance between empowering staff to take ownership of their work within a context of management arrangements to monitor performance and share good practice. There is some scope to take this further by staff becoming even better aware of the different strengths which each displays in classroom delivery.  Staff are well qualified and most have recent business experience.  The consolidation of business teaching rooms into one corridor where students know staff can routinely be found has been a successful initiative.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 some employer involvement is evident, although as the self assessment recognises there is scope for further engagement, especially for A level business students  the range of courses in business is limited to level 3 although the college is considering including business as part of a revised GCSE offer  students additional support needs in key skills are not systematically identified and met. Key skills accreditation is confined to ICT. No current business students are seeking accreditation in key skills at Level 3 even though opportunities are signalled in the course handbook.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business courses in the college.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of the half-term following the inspection. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion