Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bev Barlow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bev Barlow

  • Postcode verified

    PR7 3NT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−36Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedwell plannedeffectivelyclearenjoywell supported
Criticismnot alwaysinsufficientweaknessesdeclinednot yetnot clearlowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings519w−29
  • Leadership134w−49
  • What needs to improve151w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
782
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Ms Wendy White Headteacher Holy Cross Catholic High School Burgh Lane Chorley Lancashire PR7 3NT

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 27 November 2006 to look at work in business education.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on economic and business understanding and financial capability for all pupils.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The overall effectiveness of business education was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Overall pupils make satisfactory progress in GCSE business studies and leisure and tourism.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards on GCSE business studies and leisure and tourism are good. The proportion of pupils gaining grades A*-C has improved slightly in the last two years and is above the national average.  The school’s analysis of pupils’ performance in 2006, based on what can be expected from their results in the Key Stage 3 tests, indicates that in Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk GCSE business studies most achieve their predicted grades and in leisure and tourism most achieve a grade above what was expected.  Boys did not achieve as well as the girls in both GCSE subjects.  Pupils show good attitudes to learning and are well motivated. Pupils were not always able to use business vocabulary effectively in class discussions and the revision lessons observed revealed some misunderstanding of basic concepts.  The standard of pupils’ coursework is good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of business education

The quality of teaching and learning in business education is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of business education

 Lessons are well planned with clear learning objectives. Well structured worksheets support learning but there are insufficient opportunities for higher attaining pupils to develop their responses.  An increasing range of teaching and learning methods is being developed, but teachers tend to spend too much time talking, leaving insufficient time for pupils to be involved in activities.  The use of information technology to support learning is underdeveloped.  Assessment of coursework is thorough and supports pupils in achieving high grades.  Recent improvements in preparing pupils for external examinations has resulted in improved results. Pupils are not always clear about how well they are doing during the course and there is insufficient emphasis on developing their skills of application and analysis.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The curriculum in business education is satisfactory. The proportion of pupils taking GCSE business studies or leisure and tourism has declined and is now low.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Links with local businesses help to enhance the delivery of GCSE leisure and tourism but they are underdeveloped in business studies.  The school has recently introduced an eight week enterprise module in the technology carousel for all pupils in Key Stage 3 as a way of increasing interest and a better take-up of business courses in Key Stage 4. Pupils enjoy working in groups on a practical enterprise project, for example devising a calendar, board game or chocolate bar.  In Key Stage 4 a range of additional activities including work experience, aspects of citizenship and a complementary programme of study has been developed to cover the national requirements for economic and business understanding, but it is too soon to judge the impact of these.

p.2

Leadership and management of business education

Leadership and management of business education are satisfactory.

p.3

Leadership and management of business education

 The teacher responsible for managing and teaching business courses is well supported by senior managers. Good practice in teaching and learning is shared through discussions with other teachers in the humanities department and through contact with a business studies teacher in another school.  Weaknesses in the provision have been identified but the strategies to address these are not always clear.  The school has rightly identified the development of enterprise education as an important priority and has reflected this by making it the responsibility of an assistant headteacher. However, the school has not yet introduced an overarching policy on economic and business understanding, including financial capability or considered in detail how pupils’ skills will be developed and assessed as they move through the school.

p.3

Inclusion

 In the Key Stage 4 option system GCSE business studies is available to all pupils, but applied GCSE leisure and tourism is only available to pupils in the lower band group.  In lessons teaching does not always respond to the broad range of pupils’ abilities and meet their individual needs.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensure the range of teaching and learning methods meets the needs of individual pupils  develop the use of information technology, including the electronic whiteboard, to support pupils’ learning, particularly in classroom based activities  set GCSE business studies pupils regular written work that can be assessed by the teacher to ensure that pupils are aware of the standards they are achieving and what they need to do to improve  develop a more coherent whole school provision for enterprise education that identifies clear learning outcomes and ways in which pupils’ progress will be assessed.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion