Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Bowles

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Bowles

  • Postcode verified

    BD15 9JU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearhigh expectationsconsistentskilfullywell supportedpositiveenjoyengaging
Criticismnot good progressyet tonot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings378w+57
  • Leadership203w+57
  • What needs to improve98w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
661
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Ms Woodthorpe Headteacher Sandy Lane Primary School Cottingley Road Allerton Bradford West Yorkshire BD15 9JU

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - English

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 09 November 2006 to inspect work in English.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - English

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on our current survey theme: provision for poetry. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - English

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons. The overall effectiveness of English was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards in English are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards are broadly average. The majority of pupils achieve close to expectations in both reading and writing. This includes the larger than average proportion of pupils with English as an additional language. However, the school’s own analysis indicates that some abler girls make less good progress than expected.  Lessons observed and work seen confirmed that pupils’ progress overall is at least satisfactory, as a result of a whole school emphasis on strengthening literacy teaching and assessment. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of English

The quality of teaching and learning in English is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

 Teachers manage classes well and form good relationships with pupils.  The best lessons have clear learning objectives and make good use of planned learning outcomes that give them direction. These lessons feature a wide range of strategies that give pupils opportunities to talk about language and texts. Teachers question skilfully, encouraging pupils to develop their thoughts and use spoken language accurately.  However, some teaching makes less effective use of strategies which promote high expectations, contributing to slower pace and teacher- dominated discussion.  Assessment in English is good. Expectations are set out clearly in schemes, and lesson plans are designed to move groups of pupils on from what they have shown they can already do. Teachers assess systematically against clear criteria, making increasing use of curricular targets and pupil self-evaluation.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Provision for English is broad and balanced. The schemes of work for Key Stages 1 and 2 ensure a consistent experience for all pupils, with variety and progression.  There is good support for reading and writing based on consistent approaches, for example to using phonic skills to tackle unfamiliar words and to learning handwriting.  Teachers make stimulating use of ICT, and some regularly use drama and varied speaking and listening activities in their lessons.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management in English are satisfactory with some good features.

p.2

Leadership and management

 There is good practice in English teaching. New approaches to teaching and interventions have resulted in better performance by higher attaining pupils. However, the school acknowledges that standards should be higher and have yet to show overall improvement.  The subject leader is well supported by you and the deputy headteacher to provide a clear lead for English teaching to other staff. She models several aspects of good practice.  English is well managed with clear expectations and consistent practice in assessment and monitoring. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together to apply generally well understood strategies for English teaching.

p.2

Provision for poetry

 Poetry is represented appropriately in schemes of work in each Key Stage. Pupils have many opportunities to write their own poems and to explore their own responses to a range of poems. Some of their writing is original and reflective, though this varies with the quality of stimulus and teaching.  Pupils’ attitudes are positive, and increasingly so as they grow older. They enjoy and remember poems, and can discuss why they like them. This is especially true when the strategies employed to explore them have been active and engaging.

p.3

Inclusion

 Achievement is satisfactory overall although girls have under- performed in recent years.  Teachers and other adults provide effective support for pupils with English as an additional language through their consistent use of appropriate strategies.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 raising standards, notably for more able pupils, especially girls  spreading the best practice in English teaching, including consistency in assessment and planning, but also providing more activities which challenge and encourage learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning Skills Council. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion