Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Andrea Tapsfield
- Postcode verified
SG5 2UR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school. p.4
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.4
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment11
“Students’ behaviour was excellent, reflecting teachers’ high expectations.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 761
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr P Loach Headteacher The Priory School Bedford Road Hitchin Hertfordshire SG5 2UR
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11-12 October to look at work in geography.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject/aspect, the visit had a particular focus on the global dimension in geography.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of six lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography
Overall the effectiveness of geography was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Key Stage 3 standards are close to the national average, with slightly fewer students achieving higher levels. However, students’ progress in the lessons observed was good and their responses to extended writing tasks often showed good reasoning and explanation. At GCSE, students’ standards are below the national average, although broadly similar to their achievements in their other subjects. Students Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk do not make the same progress in geography during Key Stage 4 as they do at Key Stage 3. Progress was satisfactory in the Year 10 and 11 lessons observed. Students’ behaviour was excellent, reflecting teachers’ high expectations. Students engage well with learning tasks and show high motivation and interest in the subject.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in geography is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Teaching is confident and draws on the teachers’ very good subject knowledge. Lessons are well structured and engage learners well in learning tasks. Lessons begin with imaginative activities that motivate students very well from the start. A good range of teaching strategies is used although opportunities are not always taken to use discussion and student talk to achieve learning of the highest quality. Assessment units are used very effectively in Key Stage 3 to assess attainment accurately. However, the lack of a geography baseline on entry into Year 7 makes monitoring of progress less secure. Students show a very good understanding of how to achieve higher levels. Teachers give students good feedback on their work with guidance on how to improve.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The curriculum has a diverse range of themes which enthuse students. It is continually developing, for example to introduce thinking skills and new topics such as global fashion. It is supported with good, up-to-date resources. Good attention is paid to literacy and ICT. Detailed audits have been undertaken, for example to show how geography contributes to citizenship and enterprise. Less emphasis is given to fieldwork skills and techniques and environmental issues than to places and geographical patterns and processes.
p.2
Leadership and management of geography
Leadership and management of geography are good.
p.2
Leadership and management of geography
The department is well organised and the staff work well as a team. They have adopted new initiatives to better meet student needs, such as diversifying into Leisure and Tourism and changing the GCSE syllabus. Staff listen to, and act on, feedback, for example from the department review and pupil questionnaires. To date there has been little consideration given to pupils’ prior geography experiences. The teaching rooms provide a good geography learning environment, including displays that show levelled work and ways to raise achievement. The department has good systems for student self-review, target setting and progress tracking. However, the analysis of student outcomes tends to focus on individual performance and does not do enough to identify possible underlying causes for some underachievement, particularly at Key Stage 4.
p.2
Subject issue: the global dimension
Students’ learning about the global dimension is good.
p.3
Subject issue: the global dimension
The curriculum provides good coverage of global topics and pays good attention to aspects such as the rights and responsibilities of global citizens. There are good opportunities for students to make local/global links, for example in a Year 7 lesson where students explored the meaning of ‘interdependence’ through considering their food and possessions.
p.3
Inclusion
The provision for inclusion is satisfactory.
p.3
Inclusion
Detailed records are held of students’ special needs and the department has provided opportunities for gifted and talented students to participate in extra-curricular events in the local area. Teaching staff check carefully on students’ understanding and progress in lessons, although teaching assistants are not used effectively enough. In September mixed ability teaching was introduced in Years 8, 9 and 11. There has been insufficient planning and preparation to ensure this is implemented successfully.
p.3
Areas for improvement
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
p.3
Areas for improvement
raise achievement at Key Stage 4 and increase the proportion of students attaining Level 6 at the end of Key Stage 3 review teaching strategies and the curriculum for mixed ability classes seek ways to provide more opportunities for students to develop their fieldwork skills and their environmental understanding explore the previous geography experience of Year 7 students and establish their starting points when they join the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion