Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robert McKeown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robert McKeown

  • Postcode verified

    MK17 9QL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresshigh qualityimprovingenjoyenthusiasticstrengthseffectivelyaccurate
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaystoo fewyet tolimitedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings415w+24
  • Leadership195w−8
  • What needs to improve92w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
688
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Mrs C Woodstock Headteacher Woburn Lower School Bedford Street Woburn Milton Keynes MK17 9QL

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 26 September 2006 to look at work in Physical Education (PE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of PE, the visit had a particular focus on the Physical Education School Sport and Club Links (PESSCL) strategy.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and children, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of children’s reports and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The overall effectiveness of PE was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards in PE are in line with those expected in the aspect of PE observed during the inspection (games). The Foundation Stage profile for 2006 indicates that children in reception achieved at or above the expected level for physical development by the time they entered Year 1. Standards in swimming are above expected levels. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Children make satisfactory progress in PE. The school believes they make good progress in swimming. Children learn to acquire, develop and evaluate their skills in PE. They have a good knowledge of what happens to their bodies when they exercise and can talk about why it is important to keep fit and healthy. Children say they enjoy PE. In lessons, they behave well, have good attitudes and participate enthusiastically.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teaching is satisfactory overall with some good features. An appropriate lesson structure is in place and suitable emphasis is placed on working towards the ten high quality outcomes. Children are managed well and teaching assistants complete useful assessments during lessons. Good emphasis is placed on children discussing and evaluating their performances and on developing independence and cooperation.  The pace in lessons is not always brisk enough and more talented children are not extended or challenged sufficiently. Too little emphasis is given to improving skills. Although teachers assess children’s performances during lessons, there is no formal system for recording and monitoring progress.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Two hours of curriculum time are allocated to PE, including swimming. The school does well to provide a balanced programme of gymnastics, dance and games with restricted accommodation. Resources are adequate but children have too few opportunities to take part in extra curricular sports activities or inter school tournaments. Year 4 children have the chance to attend a popular weekend residential which focuses on outdoor and adventure activities and helps to prepare children for middle school.

p.2

Leadership and management of PE

The quality of leadership and management in PE are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of PE

 The subject leader is enthusiastic and committed to improving provision. She has strengthened her subject knowledge through attending the primary link teacher training and subject leader network meetings. She has completed an accurate audit of the strengths and weaknesses in provision and drawn up a set of improvement priorities.  Subject monitoring has included lesson observations, a scrutiny of planning and collecting a record of children’s participation in physical activities. The outcomes from the monitoring activities have yet to be analysed and evaluated.

p.2

Subject issue – PESSCL Programme

 The impact of the PESSCL programme is limited.  Attendance at PLT meetings has helped the subject leader to focus on improving aspects of provision, such as assessment, but many tournament and coaching activities offered by the partnership have not been taken up.  Recent training for midday supervisory staff will help the school to organise more purposeful play activities at lunchtime. However, the school has not taken full advantage of professional development courses and support from the sports coordinator to help improve the quality of teaching and learning. Progress with implementing the family development plan requires an urgent review.

p.3

Inclusion

 All children are included in PE lessons including those with learning difficulties and disabilities. Teaching assistants are employed effectively to ensure all children participate. Good emphasis is placed on children collaborating during PE lessons.  There is no specific provision for gifted and talented children, although the school advises parents when children show particular skill in a sport or physical activity which might be extended.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 engage more with the PESSCL programme to enhance out of hours provision for children and to improve the quality of teaching and learning  establish a suitable system for assessing, recording and reporting children’s achievements in PE.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion