Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    EX16 6SQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenthigh qualityhigh expectationsmake good progresswell supportedeffectiveeager

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings627w+92
  • Leadership88w+60
  • What needs to improve96w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
785
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Mr Lovett Headteacher Tiverton High School Bolham Road Tiverton Devon EX16 6SQ

p.1

Education (PSHE)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 06-07 November 2006 to look at work in PSHE.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our evaluation and reporting. Any published report is likely to list the names of the institutions visited, but we would not identify individual institutions within the report itself.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements I made included: interviews with members of the schools’ leadership and management team, the Key Stage managers, the subject leader for PSHE, the Chair of Governors, key members of the support staff and the catering manager, scrutiny of school documentation including the department evaluation form, analysis of students’ work, observation of three lessons and discussions with students.

p.1

Education (PSHE)

I undertook to provide a brief written version of the main points made in my feedback at the end of the visit, to support development in PSHE. This follows:

p.1

Education (PSHE)

The overall effectiveness of PSHE is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Students are developing their subject knowledge and understanding and make good progress as they move through the school.  They are able to reflect on and discuss their understanding of issues and show considerable respect for the feelings and views of others. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk They are right in their view that this contributes to the good relationships that exist in the school as they show interest in and respect for the views of others.

p.1

Personal development and well-being

The personal development and well-being of the students is good with outstanding features.

p.2

Personal development and well-being

 Students have a good understanding of the importance of a healthy lifestyle. As they move up the school they develop their understanding of sexual health risks and of drugs and their effects.  Students feel safe. They report that the school responds appropriately to any issues of bullying.  The involvement of students in the community is outstanding.  Students have a good understanding of their personal achievements. At key points, such as Year 9 options, they are well supported so that they are able to make choices that reflect this good understanding of their potential.

p.2

Teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Teaching and learning

 Teachers’ lesson planning is good and is based on the detailed guidance provided by the subject leader. The subsequent lessons set high expectations of the students. Lessons proceed at a good pace with effective use made of a range of appropriate teaching methods that include paired and group work as well as general discussions. The students respond enthusiastically and are eager participants in all aspects of their learning.

p.2

Curriculum

 The newly revised curriculum meets the needs of the students. The programme is planned effectively and provides continuity and progression of learning.  There are good links with work in other subjects. The school’s visual arts specialist status is making a significant contribution to PSHE and citizenship through, for example, the outstanding art work in Year 7 on the theme of respect.

p.2

Student support and guidance

The quality of support and guidance for the students is outstanding.

p.3

Student support and guidance

 The roles of tutors and Key Stage managers are clearly defined. They, and the students, receive excellent support from key staff such as the welfare officer.  Students also benefit from excellent academic support. They are set challenging targets and receive regular feedback on their progress.  Students are rightly concerned that community perceptions of their school are inaccurate.

p.3

Leadership and management

Subject leadership and management are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject leader has reviewed and written high quality guidance for her team.  All statutory requirements are fully met.

p.3

Specific focus of the inspection: healthy eating

 The quality of the school meal policy is good.  The school is working towards meeting the new food standards required for school meals.  The choice of meals is good. Most students select healthy meals and enjoy the social opportunity that lunch gives them.  The food technology department has made a good start towards improving students’ practical skills.

p.3

Inclusion

 The students feel that everyone in the school is valued. Relationships between students and with the staff are good. Teaching and learning and the high quality curriculum are well matched to the needs of the students.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 consider the extent to which careers education and guidance can be provided by tutors as well as the PSHE programme  determine the extent to which external agencies can continue to provide support to meet the needs of the students.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion