Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes6
“The results inform individual learning plans very well.” p.2Leadership & governance3
“How well targets are used during lessons is yet to be formally monitored by management.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 770
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Date of visit: 16 January 2007
This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.
p.1
recording of learning targets?
The college has made good progress and has implemented a new system of recording learning targets since the last inspection. A scoring system, against specific and well targeted objectives has been introduced. The overall scores against each target are being regularly reviewed each term. Of those produced to date, there are clear indications of progress made by the learner. The system enables staff to appropriately assess if targets have been set too high or too low. The system records and captures all accredited and non-accredited parts of the learners’ programmes well. There are opportunities to change targets each term and additional learning and achievements acknowledged and recorded when appropriate. This is a new system, which has not yet completed a full annual cycle and it is therefore too early to judge its full impact.
p.1
learning targets?
Lessons plans satisfactorily include learners’ targets. How well targets are used during lessons is yet to be formally monitored by management.
p.1
towards?
The process for baseline assessments within the learners’ first term is satisfactory overall. The results inform individual learning plans very well. The college recognise that they have yet to ensure that all teachers use pre-entry and baseline assessment information to establish the learners’ skills and understanding at the start of their course modules across all areas of their programme, particularly for non-accredited learning.
p.2
range of courses available?
There are still good links with local colleges. Management have appointed one member of staff with responsibility for co-ordinating and quality monitoring of these links. Some difficulties with local college provision has resulted in some level 1 courses no longer being available for St. John’s learners to undertake. The college has recently established links with a third local college, and is currently developing service level agreements with all three colleges.
p.2
provision in relation to student learning and achievement?
Quality assurance processes are improving. Much work has been done to improve the quality of teaching and learning through the development of a new teaching observation scheme to be introduced from January 2007. To enable staff to be more involved in their own evaluation of teaching and learning, the new lesson observation system is based on a peer monitoring system. Education staff are receiving training on observation protocols with a view for them to be operational from February 2007. The college has devised a more rigorous analysis of attendance so that patterns can be identified and used to plan lessons and deploy support staff more effectively. This will be linked with a reward system to provide appropriate incentives to improve individual student attendance and to maximise achievements. These systems show potential in enabling the college to improve their evaluation of the quality of provision by the college, but it is too early to assess their
p.2
is it being monitored?
The quality improvement plan contains appropriate actions, which when fully implemented, will lead to improvements for those aspects of provision identified within the last inspection report. This is in the process of being updated, as some dates for the completion of actions are not stated or in need of amendment. The plan is being monitored closely through the regular meetings held by the charity’s Business Management Team (BMT) and college’s Senior Management Team (SMT), to ensure actions remain on track for their completion.
p.3
assessment process?
An audit committee has recently been established with members of the governing body taking a more predominant role in assessing the quality of provision. Information from this committee will be used to inform further improvements needed to improve provision.
p.3
for learners with restricted mobility?
The college has made much progress in this area. There is now a policy and procedure relating to the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA), and all staff have received training in its implementation. There is a very detailed plan to ensure the college adheres to the Disability Equality Duty. Comprehensive data has been collated in accordance with requirements and some of this has been used effectively to inform future improvements. The plan is not yet systematically monitored to ensure actions required are adhered to in accordance with specified dates. There are plans to appoint a disability co-ordinator to oversee its implementation and to incorporate a review of the plan within self assessment processes. Work has commenced to improve access on the site for learners with physical disabilities. Some teaching accommodation is in need of redecoration. This is being undertaken during the continuing improvements and refurbishment of the buildings.
p.3
for learners with restricted mobility?
information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion