Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Mar 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedoutstandinghighly effectiveinadequatewell designedhigh qualityimprovingeffective
Criticismat risknot sufficientlyconcerndecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • Leadership171w+38
  • What needs to improve769w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
964
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 79%

Full report text

Date of visit: 24 January 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

improved?

Qualification success rates for learners on long courses have improved significantly over the last five years. Level 1 Success rates for 16 to 18 year olds have been maintained at a high level and for learners aged over 19, have improved even further. Rates are well above the national averages. Level2 Success rates for all learners are high and well above the national average. Level 3 Highly effective strategies have been used to improve success rates. For 16- 18 year olds rates are now around the median and for learners aged over 19 they have improved to well above the national average.

p.1

been an improvement?

Apprenticeships Success rates on apprenticeships except construction (electrical installation) are at least satisfactory. There is an improving trend and most success rates are above national averages. Train to Gain Achievement rates are at least satisfactory. Challenging improvement targets have been set for 2006/07. Entry to employment This is a very small programme with only six learners. Progression rates are good.

p.1

skills qualifications been maintained?

 In 2004/05 there was a significant improvement in key skills achievements across all levels and subjects. This improvement was not maintained in 2005/06. Only half of the students taking information technology at level 1 or 2 gained the qualifications. In communications and application of number results were better but there was still a significant decline. The college recognised this trend and has put in place a focussed action plan for improvement.

p.2

support for learners and the monitoring of progress via tutorials?

 The college has established effective new systems to measure the impact of additional learning support. Additional learning support includes extra tutorial allocation, double staffing in some lessons, specialist basic skills teaching or the individual use of a learning support assistant. Success rates of students who received additional learning support in 2005/06 were 5% above the college average. Better procedures to monitor learner’s progress and support those at risk of failing have been introduced via a revised tutorial system.

p.2

and key skills?

 The college has developed a useful plan to improve teaching and learning. Observations made by external consultants show that the majority of teaching is good or outstanding and there is almost no inadequate teaching. The information collected on the quality of teaching and learning in work based learning is not analysed sufficiently to allow managers to gain an overview of strengths or areas for improvement in this area.  The college is determined to maintain the level of improvements seen in key skills in 2004/05 and has put into place a challenging action plan which focuses on improving teaching and learning. Reports to monitor the progressive implementation of the plan are not sufficiently evaluative. Information is not being used to measure the impact of the plan and there is an over reliance on the use of end of year results. Curriculum area managers are rarely asked for evaluative reports, tutorial records of

p.2

and key skills?

student progress in key skills are not collated or analysed sufficiently and the observation of key skills lessons are not used to inform managers of particular issues of good practice or areas for improvement.

p.3

and key skills?

 Surveys carried out by the college show very positive levels of student satisfaction for college provision overall. The college has carried out specific satisfaction surveys to gain learners’ views of work based learning and key skills. The small number of learners who spoke to inspectors expressed a general satisfaction with their programmes. They explained that the new campus was a huge improvement but there were still some issues with shortages of some resources used for practical work.

p.3

provision?

 The college provides a good range of vocational programmes for year 10 and 11 school pupils. The programmes are well designed and the college works well with local schools to meet the needs of pupils who find academic work difficult or who have clear vocational aims. The college is particularly successful at preventing year 11 pupils at risk of leaving school with no qualifications and failing to find employment and training from doing so. The college has developed appropriate plans to build on these firm foundations.

p.3

What has been the impact of “Every Child Matters”?

 The college has a wide range of enrichment activities which are appropriately linked to the five outcomes of Every Child Matters. In particular, students take part in charitable fund raising activities and community activities. The tutorial programme offers a suitably broad range of topics such as drug awareness, countering bullying, racism and financial management. Participation rates are monitored on an individual basis but not analysed in sufficient detail to confirm that activities attract students from across the college. Staff interviewed by inspectors were aware of the college child protection policy. The college carries out appropriate staff checks under the Criminal Records Bureau system.

p.3

What has been the impact of the management restructure?

 The management restructure has considerably strengthened the systems and procedures to promote high quality teaching and learning. It is too early to see the impact of the management restructure on achievements in the curriculum areas graded as satisfactory within the SAR. The college is determined to become outstanding; it recognises that it is not there yet and has put in place a challenging development plan.

p.4

analysis:

In September 2006 the college moved to new, purpose built accommodation. The college is currently in LSC financial category C however this has been planned for and the indicative financial forecasts suggest a return to category A by 2009.

p.4

analysis:

Students who spoke to inspectors welcomed the improvement to the campus and the much improved ambience of the college. However several expressed concern about the small size of classrooms, restricted space within the dining areas and shortages of some practical resources.

p.4

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.4

analysis:

Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion