Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Driscoll

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Driscoll

  • Postcode verified

    WV4 5DG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentexceptionalexceptionallyvery wellgood progresswell plannedvery highenthusiastic
Criticismnot good enoughlacknot well preparedlowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings558w+78
  • Leadership283w+5
  • What needs to improve125w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
946
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Mr Byatt Headteacher Colton Hills Community School Jeremy Road Goldthorn Park Wolverhampton West Midlands WV4 5DG

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5-6 October to look at work in ICT.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of ICT, the visit had a particular focus on the assessment of ICT and the readiness of the school for the onscreen Key Stage 3 ICT test.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, analysis of data, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work, observation of four lessons and visits to one other.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – ICT

The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards in ICT are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards in ICT are average at the end of Key Stage 3. This represents a satisfactory level of achievement. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Results in the GCSE examination in 2006 were very low. The pupils who studied the subject in Year 11 underachieved as a result of severe problems with staffing, which also affected Year 10 pupils.  Pupils currently in Year 11 are now making good progress. Current standards are average which represents satisfactory achievement for these pupils.  Pupils are very enthusiastic about ICT, although many lack self- confidence and need to be prompted by teachers rather than trying to find solutions for themselves.  Pupils work hard and concentrate very well in ICT lessons. Behaviour is excellent. Pupils are particularly polite and well- mannered.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in ICT is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Lessons are consistently well planned to meet the needs of different pupils. Work is suitably demanding, although pupils are not given enough encouragement to speak aloud in lessons.  Teachers have a good knowledge of the subject and of the requirements of the examination syllabus. Standards of discipline are very high.  In other subjects, there is extensive use of ICT to improve teaching methods and enrich the experience of pupils. Pupils use ICT to improve their work in many lessons and at lunchtimes. However, they are unable to access their work from home.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 All pupils study ICT in Key Stage 3. The curriculum at Key Stage 3 meets requirements, but provides few opportunities for pupils to be innovative or develop their creativity. In art, on the other hand, pupils in Year 10 have produced some exceptional work when supported by professional designers.  At Key Stage 4, ICT is an option which is chosen by the great majority of pupils. Those not studying the subject are having a course planned for them to meet National Curriculum requirements.  Too little time is allocated to the double award GCSE course, which places great demands on pupils, and prevents the less able pupils from completing the course.  In other subjects, many teachers use ICT effectively in their lessons to enable pupils to apply their ICT capability. Pupils at Key Stage 4 say that they use ICT everyday in at least one subject other than ICT.

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

Leadership and management of ICT are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

 ICT has been given a high profile by senior managers who see it as a means of raising standards across the school. The school has made good use of its recent specialist status. Resources have been well chosen and deployed. Interactive whiteboards are well used, both by pupils and teachers, who have benefited from effective training.  The school is innovative in its use of ICT. Groups of pupils in modern languages and business education have ‘e-mentors’ in local businesses, who they can contact for research purposes. Higher attaining pupils have been issued with PDAs as part of a pilot scheme to evaluate their use in schools.  The subject is well managed on a day-to-day basis. The school has an accurate picture of standards and the progress of pupils in the longer term, although the tracking of pupils’ progress over shorter periods is just developing.

p.3

Key Stage 3 ICT test

 Standards are assessed accurately and progress over time is monitored. The school is currently developing a system that will show how well an individual is doing against their targets.  The school is not well prepared for the onscreen Key Stage 3 ICT test. The school entered all Year 9 pupils for the test in 2006. As they were the only school to do so, they received considerable support from the local authority. The guidance was late arriving and the school found that the specification of some hardware was not good enough. After several technical problems the school eventually sent 118 tests for marking, but only six arrived and of these only two pupils were given a mark. Only eight pupils were able to register for test 2.

p.3

Inclusion

The school works exceptionally hard to ensure that ICT is used to help all pupils to maximise their potential. Pupils who do not have access to ICT facilities at home are provided with laptops. Particularly good use of ICT is made in helping those who are learning English for the first time, although this would be improved further by providing more computers for them to use. Pupils who find controlling their behaviour difficult have access to ICT, which allows them to keep up with their work when removed from lessons. Special arrangements have been made for those with physical disabilities to ensure they are not disadvantaged. Lower attaining pupils and those with learning difficulties are helped to improve the quality of their presentation, which raises their self-confidence and levels of self-esteem.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 to ensure the curriculum at Key Stage 3 provides more opportunities for pupils to be creative, and that courses at Key Stage 4 are more suited to the different needs of pupils  to increase the number of computers available for use in the learning centre for pupils who are at an early stage of learning English  to improve the opportunities for pupils to access their work from home.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion