Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Jones
- Postcode verified
CB1 2RS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 21
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Cambridge Education Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS T 01223 578500 F 01223 578501 Risp.inspections@camb-ed.com Ofsted helpline 0845 640 4045
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 23 January 2007 with my colleague, Usha Devi, Additional Inspector. We were grateful for the time you gave to our telephone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during our visit. Please give our thanks to the pupils and staff who gave up part of their lunch hours to speak with us.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
As a result of the inspection on June 2006, the school was asked to improve the quality of teaching and learning; address the unsatisfactory behaviour of a minority of pupils; and raise standards and achievement.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making good progress in addressing the issues for improvement.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
The section 5 inspection report of June 2006 correctly highlighted notable weaknesses in the standards and achievement of pupils in Year 6. In this year group, weak teaching and poor behaviour by a minority of pupils, notably boys, combined to produce results that were well below the local and national average. In Year 2, standards and achievement had declined steadily for a number of years.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
Standards are now improving significantly in Year 6 as a result of good teaching. Reading has improved noticeably because of very good oral work but writing skills require more emphasis. In Year 2, pupils are making satisfactory progress in reading and mathematics; the proportion of pupils on track to reach the desired standard is above average. As with Key Stage 2, more needs to be done to develop the pupils’ writing skills. Similarly, weaknesses in the pupils’ literacy skills in Years 3 and 4 reflect previous underachievement and require more attention.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
The quality of teaching is good and has improved significantly. The management of behaviour is usually effective and more consistent than that noted in the section 5 inspection report. Very good monitoring and evaluation procedures have been introduced with clear guidance provided for all staff. The headteacher was invited to join HMI in a joint observation of teaching; her judgements were succinct and secure.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
In a vibrant literacy lesson, Year 6 pupils displayed an outstanding grasp of characterisation. Their excellent understanding of the text produced a rich and imaginative vocabulary. Grammatical understanding was good. Behaviour was excellent in this challenging lesson.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
In lessons where tasks met the pupils’ different learning needs, the pupils responded enthusiastically and their attitudes to learning were good. Where teaching was less effective, tasks did not provide the structure to give pupils access to the work; sound introductions were followed by tasks that failed to meet the pupils’ learning needs. In some instances the lack of engagement developed into social chatter.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
Relationships between pupils are good. They take turns, support each other and work well during group activities. Pupils are keen to engage in conversations about the school. They say that they like coming to school because everyone is polite and friendly. The school seeks the views of the pupils through the school council, who meet regularly to discuss the ways in which the school can be further improved. Members of the council feel that the staff listen to what they have to say and that lessons are fun because they have ‘something new to learn everyday’. Attendance has improved significantly and is now in line with primary schools nationally.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
The school has found the local authority’s support helpful and is now sufficiently confident to develop key ideas itself. However, addressing the underachievement that became evident in the last two years will require some elements of support to be continued into the next academic year.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion