Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Feb 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Painter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Painter

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
42
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%About the inspection 95%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG Direct Tel: 01695 566930 Direct Fax : 01695 729320

p.1

Mrs K Benetis Headteacher High Bank First School and Early Years Unit Eighth Avenue Liversedge West Yorkshire WF15 8LD

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 30 January 2007, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please also pass on my thanks to the children and governors for their help.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

As a result of the inspection on June 2006, the school was asked to  Raise achievement and standards in English and mathematics in Years 3 and 4.  Increase the quantity and consistency of good teaching.  Raise the level of attendance.  Extend the role of the governing body in monitoring and evaluating the quality of education the school provides.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that, at this time, the school is making good progress in addressing the issues for improvement. The support of the local authority has been well targeted at the school’s needs. Specialist staff have helped the school to tackle the issues in its action plan. Staffing has now settled, following substantial changes, with an experienced teacher now taking the Year 3 and 4 class. An extended leadership team has been successfully established, which enthusiastically shares and implements the headteacher’s clear vision for improvement.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

The core of the school’s successful approach to improvement lies in extensive provision to tackle children’s language needs. Successful training has equipped teaching and support staff to quickly and accurately identify pupils’ needs. There is a strong team approach that focuses closely on children’s learning and there are appropriate strategies to help children to improve. All children are therefore benefiting from a wider range of approaches and those with additional needs are better supported. This is reducing the accumulated past underachievement and is having a significant impact on children’s learning in all subjects.

p.1

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

Teachers are more conscious of the need for coherent approaches throughout the school. For example, their good use of agreed techniques to encourage children’s speaking and listening skills has improved the consistency of teaching. Their lesson plans identify what children need to learn and they make these aims clear to children. Detailed assessment systems give an accurate picture of children’s progress. Regular reviews raise expectations further, as successful provision improves children’s standards. Teachers make increasing use of assessment information to match tasks to children’s abilities. This process is further aided by the strategy of teaching Years 1 to 4 children in ability groups for English and mathematics. Regular reviews ensure that children are appropriately placed. Well planned intervention tackles any occasions where learning is less successful. Children have a range of targets in English and mathematics and are encouraged to

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

make their own evaluations of how well they have learned. Teachers’ marking often helps children to improve their work.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

As a result of the above improvements, children’s standards of attainment are rising throughout the school. The school’s results in the 2006 Year 2 national assessments rose sharply to around the national average, representing good progress for these children. They are now maintaining this rate of progress in Year 3. Year 4 pupils are making similarly good gains, although their past underachievement means that the standards they are reaching remain lower.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

Children show good levels of enthusiasm for lessons, which are now more relevant and challenging. As a result, they are keener to attend and behaviour has improved. The school has taken effective action to improve attendance, including clearer expectations and a series of appropriate rewards for classes and individuals. This has lifted attendance well; current figures are around the national average.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

Governors have had effective training to increase their skills and they now monitor the school more actively. They have detailed information, for example, on curriculum change and school statistics, with good support to understand the implications. Governors have revised many of their systems to ensure a greater focus on accountability. Many governors are regular visitors into school. Some are linked to aspects of the school’s work and have reported back their direct observations to meetings in various forms. This is a helpful start, but reports do not refer specifically to aspects of the school’s improvement plan to aid the evaluation of progress.

p.2

OFSTED MONITORING OF SCHOOLS WITH NOTICE TO IMPROVE

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion