Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BS2 8RR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 44
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Tribal Education and Technology 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0845 123 6001 F 0845 123 6002 Ofsted helpline 08456 404045 edhelpline@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
The Appropriate Authority (through the Headteacher) Mrs M Harker The Headteacher Bearwood Primary School Bearwood Road Smethwick West Bromwich B66 4HB
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I visited your school on 25 May, for the time you gave to our phone discussions, and for the information which you provided before and during my visit.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
Having considered carefully all the evidence presented by the school and the local authority, together with evidence from Ofsted data, I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress on the issues identified at the last inspection.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
The inspection in November 2005 identified improvements that were required in the following areas: standards in mathematics and writing at Key Stage 1; aspects of teaching, especially at Key Stage 1; the use of assessment information, particularly to match work better for more able pupils; opportunities for children in Reception to do more recording; and the role of subject leaders and the senior management team.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
The headteacher and deputy headteacher accept the relevance of these issues and have worked keenly to tackle them. The local authority has provided good levels of support. Pertinent work was already underway but the inspection report has strengthened the emphasis given to some areas, such as improvement at Key Stage 1. The restructuring of the leadership team, which was being planned when the inspection was carried out, has been finalised and will take effect from September. It reduces the size of the senior team to four, with the intention of making it more strategic.
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
A second tier of management, at phase level, will be expected to focus more sharply on implementing changes. The attachment of a member of the senior team to each phase is sensible. Improvements in the recording of assessment data and its analysis, instigated by the local authority, have strengthened the school’s evaluation of its performance. The data is being used effectively to check on the progress which pupils are making and to identify where intervention is required. It shows that standards at Key Stage 1 are likely to equal those of last year’s Year 2, which represents good progress from the pupils’ starting points. The use of assessment by teachers, however, remains a weakness. Lesson planning does not routinely refer to pupils’ attainment and teachers are not sufficiently familiar with what is required at each level, making it difficult for them to match work accurately to pupils’ needs. The school has undertaken
p.1
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
training on assessment for learning and teachers understand its importance. Nevertheless, there are examples of poor marking where pupils have not been given any information over the last term about how to improve.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
Teachers are clearly trying to respond to the leadership team’s efforts to raise the quality of teaching. All the lessons seen included an explicit focus on including more active ways of learning. In the Reception class, there was a strong focus on writing and evidence that the children understood what was required. However, the school’s own monitoring across the school, confirmed by Her Majesty’s Inspector, shows that there is still far too little teaching of good quality. There is also some that is inadequate. Until assessment and planning are better linked, the quality of teaching is unlikely to improve significantly. Teachers are also unused to organising learning in more active ways and sometimes struggle to manage activities and maintain the pace of learning.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
The leadership team’s monitoring, including very helpful and focused self reviews of a range of evidence, identifies accurately the weaknesses which need to be remedied. The resulting support provided by subject leaders is well focused and the school has made good strides in empowering these middle leaders to bring about improvement.
p.2
OFSTED MONITORING OF GRADE 3 SCHOOLS
The need now is for the senior team and others with management responsibilities to give an even stronger lead on the methods which teachers should employ and to ensure that these are implemented consistently. The restructured leadership team, with its focus explicitly on learning and achievement, will be well placed to do this.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion