Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Mar 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−55Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedclearlyimproving
Criticisminconsistencynot sufficientlyinconsistentlackdisruptionnot alwaysnot yetnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
705
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Date of visit: 16 November 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

How robust is the college judgement on learner achievement?

 College evidence demonstrates that learners’ progress is satisfactory overall and good in some cases. There are some very good examples of learners developing independence skills, achieving qualifications and progressing to further or higher education, where appropriate. However, there is inconsistency in the way targets are set for learners; some learners are not sufficiently challenged and this affects what they can achieve.

p.1

with more complex needs?

 Current provision is satisfactory overall but the college is undergoing a restructure to improve the curriculum it can offer to learners. The creation of a new post 16 structure is intended to provide greater flexibility in putting together a programme of learning to meet individual needs. At the same time, an audit of staff skills is planned. Training is planned for the end of term for all staff to raise their awareness and confidence in dealing with learners with dual sensory loss. Further training to develop staff will take place once the analysis of the skills audit has been undertaken. It is too early to evaluate the impact of these changes.

p.1

What developments have taken place in work placements?

 European funding has been obtained to develop the work undertaken with learners in relation to work skills. Useful work has been undertaken on the identification of barriers to employment for visually impaired learners and on methods to overcome those barriers. Vocational profiling has been an integral part of the project for assisting learners in identifying the skills needed for a particular area of work. The emphasis is clearly on experiential learning through a programme of internal as well as external work experience. The project has also allowed for job coaching support for those learners placed with local employers.

p.1

What is the impact of links with external agencies?

 The college has good links with a number of external organisations, which help its learners to access provision at further education colleges and within the wider community. These links include some made with European partners.

p.2

the last inspection?

 The college has invested in its IT facilities, which are much improved since the last inspection. However, it has not yet evaluated the impact of this on teaching and learning.

p.2

How effectively does the college monitor learner progress?

 All learners have their progress monitored but the way in which this is done is inconsistent across the organisation. There are several different systems for assessing learner needs and setting individual learner plans, against which progress can be monitored. Some of these are detailed and thorough but there is a lack of co-ordination to pull together aspects of a learner’s programme and to utilise examples of best practice.

p.2

structure; what impact is this having on learners?

 The college has involved staff, parents and students in its proposals for reorganisation and plans are in place to avoid any disruption to the delivery of learner programmes.

p.2

How robust are self-assessment and quality assurance systems?

 Self-assessment continues to be an area for development. The college has satisfactory procedures for observing teaching and learning, both at the main college and with partner organisations. Work has taken place to help the college benchmark itself against other providers and to identify areas of good practice to inform future developments. However, the self- assessment report is too descriptive and it is not always clear how judgements have been arrived at. The college is introducing a more systematic approach to quality assurance. Policies have been reviewed and rationalised into eight key areas. A draft quality framework is in place and a quality committee has been established with governor involvement. However, it is too early to evaluate the effectiveness of these measures in improving the learner experience.

p.2

measures?

 The college is making a satisfactory response to equal opportunities and safeguarding measures. Policies are being reviewed and updated, procedures are in place for child and adult protection. New staff do not commence employment until appropriate checks have been undertaken. The college’s use of volunteers is on hold while a procedure is formulated for checking their background and suitability. A good range of staff training has taken place to equip staff with up to date equality and diversity awareness. Learners are actively involved in drawing up the college’s disability equality scheme.

p.3

measures?

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion