Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Mar 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityclearrigoroussuccessfulindependent
Criticismnot yetnot alwaysvariationlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings332w+20
  • What needs to improve280w−17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
605
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%What needs to improve 46%

Full report text

Date of visit: 2 November 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

of the progress made during their time at the college?

 There is a clear picture of the progress made by each student at entry level. This is aided by the good use of targets based on the adult core curriculum; these targets are regularly reviewed. There is good achievement of external awards, where these are appropriate to individuals’ needs. The college is aware of the need for greater consistency in the quality of pre-entry level initial assessment across its two sites. The college has made a substantial commitment to training staff in the teaching of literacy and numeracy, and the use of this expertise to support all staff.

p.1

developed?

 Learners value the college’s emphasis on helping them to be more independent. There has been a review of the curriculum and baseline assessment to ensure a closer match between the two. The six weekly reviews held for each student ensure targets continue to match their needs. Information about the achievement of these targets is entered onto the new college database. Achievement of previous targets is being merged with the new computerised system to give a complete picture of progress. However, at present there is too little routine and rigorous monitoring of the quality of key aspects of this provision to ensure it is of high quality and progress is as good as it could be.

p.1

quality?

 There are termly observations of all staff who teach. While there are indications that improvements had been made from previous observations, there is not sufficient evidence to support the overall 2005/06 SAR judgement of good. There is too wide a variation in the grades awarded over time, without sufficient analysis of these differences, and the observation report is not always as helpful and evaluative as it could be. The college is aware of the need to develop its moderation of teaching and learning observations.

p.2

improvements made by the learners?

 The college has some initial evidence to indicate improvements in behaviour following the six weeks emotional intelligence programme. The college is aware that it needs to provide more rigour and focus to this evaluation to have confidence in its value.

p.2

information used?

 Implementation of the computerised database has progressed. It enables progress against targets to be tracked and a picture of progress over time to be seen. This information is not yet being used sufficiently at a departmental or college level to contribute to quality monitoring and improvement, for example, in ensuring that learners’ targets are individualised.

p.2

groups? Has there been any success in this?

 Indications are that the college has a successful strategy to promote recruitment of learners from minority ethnic groups, with a significant increase expected for next year. This strategy has included attendance at school events in areas of the country where there has previously been low levels of recruitment. It is also exploring recruitment issues with the local Connexions service and with other national specialist colleges in order to further increase its awareness and develop its strategy accordingly.

p.3

groups? Has there been any success in this?

The college is increasing its information about the representation of staff from minority groups with respect to the local community.

p.3

qualifications?

 The college reports that difficulties with its central human resources database have required a new system to be developed. It does not yet have a single central database as required by the DfES. This is in the process of completion. The college has a clear policy to ensure that staff do not begin work until appropriate checks are complete.

p.3

qualifications?

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion