Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Dec 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedstrengths
Criticismlownot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
899
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Date of visit: 16 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

performance and why?

 High success rates have largely been maintained for combined GCE advanced supplementary (AS) and GCE advanced (A) level courses in 2005/06. The success rate on A level courses has fallen slightly because the retention rate has fallen by 2 percentage points; but the success rate on AS levels has risen because the overall pass rate has risen by 3 points and the retention rate has been maintained. Some subjects (for example, AS history, AS critical thinking, AS economics, AS communications, AS media, AS computing, A level human biology, A level communications) show success rates well below the national averages for 2004/05 – in most cases this is because pass rates are low; many more (for example, AS citizenship, AS law, AS and A level biology, AVCE health and social care (double award), AVCE business (double award), AS and A levels in both German and Spanish, AS graphics) show success rates well above the national averages for

p.1

performance and why?

2004/05. General certificate of education (GCSE) pass rates at grades A - C rose to 71%. Success rates for advanced vocational certificate of education courses (AVCE) also rose and the pass rate for all such courses, for both single and double awards, was outstanding at 100%.  Success rates on key skills continued to improve in 2005/06: these are now all well above the low national averages and some (for example communications level 3 and application of number level 3) are now good. The college has succeeded in its determined efforts to ensure that as many students as possible achieve at least one key skill at the appropriate level.  The college is putting a renewed focus on raising students’ aspirations, especially in respect of their ambitions for higher education and the unrealised potential of some students to gain places at the most selective universities. The college acknowledges that some students

p.1

performance and why?

could be prepared still more thoroughly, and earlier, for their application to University.

p.2

business focus?

 Full-time enrolments by students aged 16 to 18 remain steady in 2006/07. There is a significant fall in the numbers taking level 3 courses in computing, and more of these students are now studying applied information and communications technology. Changes in enrolments by adults reflect changing funding priorities and the college’s own pricing response: considerably fewer subsidised courses and more full cost courses are now available. Numbers on full cost courses have largely been maintained despite increased costs.

p.2

show about the relative progress made by students?

 College data show that in 2005/06 students made approximately the same degree of progress as in 2004/05. Progress by AS level students, as measured by the ALPS system, has risen: the score remains grade 4, which keeps the college in the top 40% of similar colleges by this measure. Progress by A level students has risen slightly and the score remains grade 3, which keeps the college in the top 25% of similar colleges by this measure. The proportion of students gaining high grades has continued to rise, as it has nationally. The college exceeded its own A- C grade target in A levels by 2 points, but fell 5 points short of its own A-C grade target in AS levels – although the figure achieved was 3 points higher than that achieved in 2004/05. The proportion of students gaining grade A rose 3 points, and the proportion gaining grades A or B rose 4 points. The proportion gaining high grades on AVCE courses also rose.

p.2

for 2006/07?

 The Eastleigh 14-19 consortium, of which Barton Peveril college is a key member, is entering a bid to run the new 14-19 specialist diplomas. A common timetable block has been agreed between all members of the consortium – 2 colleges and 5 secondary schools. Quality assurance mechanisms and protocols have been established. The college’s specific curriculum offer is GCSE Japanese. A number of innovations are being developed within subject areas: for example, in history students are making and exchanging their own podcasts of specific topics and themes in the syllabus.  Following the recent completion of a major new building programme, many new facilities are now fully in use. Additionally, the dedicated English block has now been opened and provides a much improved subject identity and access to on-line resources. A new lecture theatre and internet café have been opened. The media area has been refurbished and now houses an adequate number of industry-standard

p.2

for 2006/07?

computers and editing facilities. The college is preparing plans for a new building to accommodate the sciences and the New Diploma provision.

p.3

findings?

 The self-assessment process for 2005/06 is not yet complete. It is being given a sharper focus by: grading all key cross-college aspects; ensuring that identified key strengths are exactly that, and not just standard good practices or features of provision; including curriculum judgements and analyses as appendices; moderating and validating curriculum reviews still more rigorously; sharing good practices in the SAR process with other colleges.  The senior management team is shortly to be increased from 4 to 6 in order to make it a more actively strategic leadership body. The additions will be a director for resources, and a director for quality and the 14-19 curriculum.

p.3

findings?

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion