Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Feb 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelygood progressoutstandingsuccessfullypositiveeffectivewell-supported
Criticismat riskdeclinedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings587w+65
  • Leadership111w+71
  • What needs to improve226w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
908
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

Name of College: West Suffolk Date of visit: 11 December 2006

p.1

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

improve for 19+ students?

 The college made good progress in 2005-06 and retention of students aged 19+ improved markedly. At levels one, two, and three, improvements were by 11%, 6% and 5% respectively. At levels three and one, overall retention for these students is now at the national average, and it is 5% above the national figure for level two. Improvements have been associated with the closure of Tektra information technology (IT) provision together with the improved performance of courses identified as being at risk. The college is predicting a further increases for retention in 2006-07 of around 2-3%

p.1

happened in 2005/06?

 The success rate for students aged 19+ on level one provision improved markedly in 2005-06, from 62% to 71%. This is 10% above the national rate. Actions taken above have contributed to this improvement, and the college is anticipating a further improvement in 2006-07 as these have a continuing impact.

p.1

learners in 2005/06?

 The achievements of work based learners improved further in 2005/06. Framework success rates increased by 4% to 63%, timely success rates by 5% to 42%, and framework national vocational qualifications (NVQ) rates from 64% to 65%. These figures are significantly above the national averages.

p.2

happened in 2005/6?

 Achievements for key skills remained outstanding in 2005/06. In addition to the maintenance of high success rates, the college successfully extended key skills provision to many more students than in the previous year.

p.2

What happened to NVQ achievements in 2005/6?

 In 2005/06 overall success rates for NVQ provision improved on the already high rate by a further 6%.

p.2

changed?

 Value added for national diploma courses improved markedly on 2005/06 and is now positive. The number of courses in which overall attainment was below that expected declined from 12 to six out of 20. The college has identified underperforming national diploma and has implemented actions to improve them.

p.2

aged 19+ in 2004/5, and has the college addressed them?

 The college has successfully addressed issues of retention in 19+ students (see above). Overall retention is now at or above the national figure at all levels for this age group.

p.2

learning?

 Many aspects of teaching and learning have improved in the short time since the last inspection. A scrutiny panel now evaluates the accuracy of lesson observations, and external validation is also used. There is an improved emphasis on the learning rather than teaching, and criteria for grading have been clarified to ensure a more accurate and consistent grade profile. Close attention is paid to students perceptions. The college is working towards using single lesson observations to inform both the college’s lesson observation scheme and initial teacher training (ITT) courses. The college recognises the need for documentation to recognise that these processes evaluate different aspects of professional practice and development.

p.3

support it provides for students?

 The college has made a good start to evaluate the effectiveness of the support it provides. Initial analysis indicates that those students in receipt of support achieve significantly better than those who do not receive it. The college is working on the more detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of support so that it can be targeted more effectively.

p.3

qualified workforce?

 The college is making good progress towards having a fully qualified workforce. 88% of full time staff and 70% of part-time staff have a teaching qualification

p.3

implemented since the last inspection?

 The college has made many improvements to the effective use of information learning technology (ILT). Teaching staff now use ILT extensively. Students make good use of IT, for example as a means of recording key skills evidence. Extensive use is made of wikkis, blogs and podcasts. In addition, staff agree that management information systems (MIS) have become more accessible and useful for up to date students evaluation. A networked assessment tracking system is currently being trialled.

p.3

developed. Has this continued?

 The college continues to effectively identify and share good practice, especially ILT. A good programme of staff development sessions is available, that often builds on aspects of good practice. The college is very good at the identification of developmental needs, and staff feel well-supported in their professional role. All managers have a target to visit at least one other organisation to observe practice within their own area.

p.4

the use of value added measures. What progress has been made?

 The college has made a good start in the use of value added measures both to evaluate students’ progress and course performance. It has a good understanding of its own provision. Plans are in hand to further develop the use of learner achievement tracker (LAT) data so that target setting and value added can be precisely applied to individual students.

p.4

recruit a governor with a HE background. Has it been successful?

 The college is currently awaiting full validation by the University Campus Suffolk. There is not at present a vacancy on the Governing body. The issue of a FE / HE representative will be considered by the governing body when a vacancy occurs.

p.4

other middle managers?

 The college continues to effectively develop managers across the college. In-house training is available to both aspiring and practicing managers. There is good access to accredited training e.g. diploma in management studies. All managers are required to visit another organisation to observe practice. Intervention strategies effectively improving satisfactory provision and managers feel well supported. Communication and networking between managers is well developed and a whole-college ethos means that sharing of ideas and improvement is good.

p.5

analysis:

 The college has improved further since the recent inspection

p.5

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion