Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Feb 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelyimprovingeffectiverobusttimelyconsistent
Criticismbelowconcerninsufficientnot alwaysslownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings176w−27
  • What needs to improve936w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,101
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 16%What needs to improve 84%

Full report text

Date of visit: 29 November 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Have overall college success rates improved?

 College data show a slight improvement in the headline success rate from 71% in the previous year to 72% in 2005/06. The overall success rate remains below the national average rate for general further education colleges. The overall headline success rate for learners aged 16 – 18 improved from 69% to 73% and this is above the national average. However, the overall success rate for adult students remained at 72% and continues to be below national levels. The overall success rate for long courses improved from 49% to 57% with improvements in success rates for both age groups. However, despite the improvement, the overall success rate for adult students on long courses remains below the national rate. In sector skills areas, overall long course success rates improved in 12 of the 14 areas where the college offer provision, although in 5 areas overall success rates remain below the national averages. The

p.1

Have overall college success rates improved?

completion rate for apprenticeship frameworks continues to rise. Headline data show that both overall and timely completion rates improved during 2005/06 and these rates are now considerably above national levels.

p.1

cause for concern. Have adult success rates improved?

 College data for 2005/06 show an improvement in adult success rates at all levels. Success rates at level 2 and 3 improved significantly. However, despite this improvement, success rates at all levels remain well below national averages and continue to be a cause for concern. The college has taken appropriate action to address courses that have persistently under- performed but has been slow to do so. The provision for adults has been appropriately rationalised in line with LSC priorities. Many courses, including franchised provision, which accounted for much of the under- performance, have now closed. Adult student enrolments and the proportion of guided learning hours for adults have reduced.

p.1

Have success rates improved on NVQ courses?

 The overall success rate on NVQ courses has improved from 24% in 2004/05 to 39% in 2005/06. Overall success rates improved at all levels and significantly so on level 1 and 2 courses. The overall success rate at level 1 is well above the national average. However, overall rates at level 2 and 3 remain below average and collectively, NVQ success rates are 21 percentage points below national levels.

p.2

How effective is the provision for key skills?

 The policy on key skills has been revised appropriately since the last annual assessment visit. Learners are now enrolled on a more appropriate range of courses and are able to develop the key skills required based on results of initial assessment and learner need. Full-time students who do not have a grade C or above at GCSE in English and mathematics are directed to a GCSE course, a key skill qualification at level 1 or 2, or to additional learning support where they are able to gain an adult literacy or numeracy award. Many full-time learners also work towards the ICT key skill at level 1, 2 or 3.

p.2

How effective is the provision for key skills?

 Key skills are becoming more effectively integrated into curriculum areas. In some areas, staff work well with key skills specialists to integrate key skill assessment criteria into curriculum focused assignments. However, the college recognises that this is not consistent practice, and acknowledge the need to review its approach to the teaching and integration of key skills. Key skill success rates continue to improve year on year.

p.2

progress on NVQ courses?

 A working group has been established to improve the performance of NVQ courses. A range of new measures aimed at improving retention and success rates have been introduced. Employers are now provided with clearer information about their roles and responsibilities in assessment, planning and reviewing of learner progress. Tutors scrutinise closely learner attendance rates and monitor progress against targets. Standardised documentation for assessment and verification activities has been introduced across most NVQ programmes. The college is aware that it needs to embed fully these new arrangements across all NVQ provision, including that for work-based learners on apprenticeship programmes.

p.2

had?

 Between 2002 and 2004 a large number of adult learners were enrolled on level 2 courses and many left without achieving a qualification. In 2005/06 a more suitable entry level qualification has been introduced. A range of other developments have been introduced to help improve attendance and success rates on ICT programmes. The college has identified the following to be the most effective of these developments. For adults: the introduction of more individualised learning programmes; the improved initial advice and guidance to better match the learner to the most appropriate programme; the improved access for adults to specialist learning support staff and the close monitoring of attendance by course tutors. For learners aged 16 to 18, the college has introduced more robust pre-course interviewing; taster courses; a wider range of courses allowing access to ICT studies at all levels; an improved induction

p.3

had?

programme and more frequent progress reviews. In 2005/06, overall long course success rates improved by 14 percentage points to 45%, but this is still below the national average rate of 50%.

p.3

monitoring and analysis lead to development and improvement?

 At the last inspection, the college was judged to have significant variations in the standards of teaching and learning and was seen to be over generous in the grades awarded to staff during observations. Since then, the college has introduced a range of new practices to better monitor teaching and learning and improve the performance of its staff. The newly established Quality Improvement Group ensures that all staff are observed throughout the year. The results of these observations now inform staff appraisal and staff development activities. The profile of lesson grades show that the quality of teaching and learning is improving. The proportion of observed teaching sessions that were graded good or better has improved from 57% in 2004/05 to 63% in 2005/06.

p.3

curriculum area performance?

 Quality assurance activities have been strengthened significantly since the last annual assessment visit. Quality improvement has a high priority within the college. A newly constituted Quality Improvement Group meets on a weekly basis to monitor and review progress against improvement targets. The level and detail of monitoring has increased and information is shared more widely with staff. The college has significantly improved its use of data to inform planning, performance monitoring and quality improvement. However, there is insufficient analysis of learner progression data and information is not always presented in a consistent format that is easy to interpret.

p.4

Any themes from the pre-visit analysis not explored during the visit:

 Due to time constraints, it was not possible to establish how compliant curriculum areas are with quality assurance procedures.

p.4

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion