Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Dec 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Joyce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Joyce

  • Postcode verified

    NN6 8LA

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedclearlytimelyeffectivelyrobusteffective
Criticismbelowdeclinedconcernunclearlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings952w+52
  • What needs to improve321w+18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,261
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Five Chimneys Welford Road Spratton Northamptonshire NN6 8LA www.ofsted.gov.uk Ofsted helpline: 08456 404045 Direct T 01604 845678 Direct M 07876651388 paul.joyce@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Sue Daley Principal Boston College Skirbeck Road Boston Lincolnshire PE21 6JF

p.1

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT

Following my visit on 31 October 2006, I write to confirm the findings of the college’s annual assessment visit. I attach feedback outlining the main conclusions. I hope you find this useful in continuing to improve provision at the college. I also attach the risk assessment from the visit.

p.1

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT

Please make sure that you bring to our attention any factual inaccuracies in the feedback, by e-mail to collegeinspections@ofsted.gov.uk , within two working days of receiving this letter. If there is anything on which you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.

p.1

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT

May I thank you, your colleagues and students for making us feel so welcome during the visit. I look forward to meeting you again.

p.1

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT

cc. Central AAV unit Nick Rashley, Executive Director, Lincolnshire and Rutland LLSC Roger Shippam HMI, Regional Divisional Manager, Ofsted Christine Langton HMI, Regional ADM, Ofsted David Knighton HMI, Patch ADM, Ofsted Alan Winchcombe, ALI information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

p.1

Date of visit: 31 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.2

success rates continue to improve?

 Headline success rates improved to 73.5% in 2004/05 and are now close to the national rate of 74%. Overall success rates for long qualifications improved by 3.1% to 62.4%, equal to the national rate. Success rates for short courses of between 5 and 24 weeks duration significantly improved although overall these remain below national rates. Success rates across most sector subject areas rose with significant improvements in health and social care and construction. College data for 2005/06 was being finalised at the time of the visit although interim data indicates continued improvement in overall success rates.

p.2

success rates continue to improve?

 The overall success rate at level 1 declined slightly during 2004/05 and remains below the national rate. Long course success rates are below national levels in arts, media and publishing and significantly below in the preparing for life and work sector subject area and the history, philosophy and theology sector subject area, although the number of learners within this area is very low.

p.2

success rates continue to improve?

 Completion rates on work-based learning programmes continue to improve. College data for 2005/06 shows an improvement of 13.9% in overall completion rates and of 30.1% in timely completion rates. Both overall and timely completion rates remain very significantly above national rates.

p.2

identified as under-performing previously?

 The college has started to use the new measures of success data to evaluate learners’ performance and has discontinued the use of other information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). value-added measures. Data, although in its pilot stage of implementation, shows that, overall, learners make at least satisfactory progress. It was not possible to evaluate any improvement in value-added scores for individual courses previously identified as underperforming. However, inspectors noted that the average points score for A level learners improved significantly during 2005/06 and that the proportion of learners gaining higher grades improved by 7% on the previous year.

p.2

development identified in teaching and learning?

 The college has appointed a new coordinator to more effectively target the continuing professional development (CPD) of staff. Roles and responsibilities are more clearly defined and CPD activities are better informed by the information collected from quality and performance monitoring processes. The observation system for monitoring teaching and learning continues to be progressively developed and refined. External observers continue to be used to validate and moderate judgements by the college observation team. A teaching toolkit has been developed and advanced practitioners provide additional support for new staff and those identified as a result of the observation process.

p.3

and verification monitored across the college?

 Additional training has been provided for staff involved in the assessment, verification and moderation of learners work. Training for staff new to assessment has been formalised. Standard documentation has been produced and is used as a basis to review compliance with awarding body requirements. Arrangements to monitor verifier and moderator reports are more robust. All reports are now reviewed and logged centrally with any resulting actions required identified, documented and monitored through to completion. The quality group report noted no significant non- compliance with any qualification awarding body during 2005/06.

p.3

design? What impact have these actions had?

 Changes have been made to the range and content of courses in response to learner feedback. Courses better meet the needs and interests of learners. Substantial investment in resources has improved the standard information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). of accommodation and equipment in the area. Changes in management have clarified roles and responsibilities of staff. The area is now self- assessed as satisfactory and success rates have started to improve. Data for 2004/05 shows a 5.7% improvement in overall long success rates although they remain below the national average.

p.3

construction?

 A comprehensive review of the construction curriculum has been completed. A carefully considered and appropriate action plan has been produced. Full-time courses at level 2 have been introduced to provide a progression route for learners completing level 1 courses and for more able learners who wish to access a level 2 course directly. Progression routes for part-time learners have been introduced and learners can now move from pre-vocational courses at level 1 to vocational courses at level 2. Courses at level 3 are being introduced to enable a progression route for learners completing level 2 qualifications.

p.4

concern?

 Quality assurance procedures have been refined and improved. Changes have been made to systems and processes which have improved the cycle of quality assurance activities. Roles and responsibilities of staff have been more clearly defined and staff have a better understanding of what to do and when to do it. There is improved availability and access to management information and improved processes for performance management. Quality assurance measures have been effective in identifying areas of concern. It is too early to measure the impact of the latest refinements to quality procedures.

p.4

and diversity within the college?

 Equality and diversity is identified as a key college priority. A satisfactory equality and diversity action plan has been produced. Equality and diversity impact measures have been identified for most aspects of college activity, although in many areas these are at an early stage of information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). implementation. The college monitors learner enrolment, success, retention and achievement rates and has set targets for improvement at whole college level. However, it is unclear how individual curriculum areas or courses contribute to these overall targets. Appropriate targets are set to increase the proportion of staff, managers and governors from under- represented groups. All staff have received recent training on matters relating to equality and diversity and good resources have been developed

p.4

and diversity within the college?

to promote and reinforce equality and diversity issues as part of a college wide tutorial programme.

p.5

analysis:

 The college has clearly identified its strategic priorities and has a focus on meeting the needs and interests of the community it serves. Collaborative provision with other providers continues to develop in Skegness and the college works closely with local schools to provide opportunities for 14-16 year olds. Arrangements for employer engagement have been strengthened within curriculum areas.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion