Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Mar 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingrigorousclearlyindependent
Criticisminconsistencynot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings201w+33
  • What needs to improve284w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
478
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%What needs to improve 59%

Full report text

Date of visit: 17 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

improved?

 Target setting has improved. Those sampled during the visit clearly indicate that they are individualised and linked to previous assessment information. Targets are sufficiently specific to provide a basis for planning and recognising progress. These improvements are part of the broader review and development of assessment and recording practices.

p.1

efforts to improve this have been effective?

 Recording of learning towards short term targets is now well established. Individual learning plans (ILPs) provide a longer term recording of progress and ensure close links with the improved curriculum framework. This is based on good understanding of needs of these learners, given their likely transition routes, for example, the importance of self-advocacy and managing and dealing with change. The development of assessment and planning has been informed by ongoing review and monitoring. This process is continuing. There is still some inconsistency in planning and recording between college and residential staff.

p.1

impact on the quality of teaching and learning?

 The college has established a range of links with other providers to improve the process, quality and accuracy of staff observations. This includes working with general further education colleges and other independent specialist colleges, Records of observations are evaluative and link closely to performance monitoring and staff development. The college has also invested in further professional development and the recruitment of qualified and experienced staff. Information provided by the college information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). indicates an improvement in the quality of teaching and learning. A peer observation scheme is due to start in the near future.

p.1

expertise in teaching?

 The college has invested in improving staff expertise through its recruitment practice, training of existing staff and its annual staff development programme. In addition, there are regular opportunities for staff to share expertise and the college is now planning to undertaken a staff skills audit to further share good practice.

p.2

college any evidence that is an improvement for students?

 The college has reviewed its tutorial system so that it includes opportunity to reflect on how well students are meeting their targets, provide support for day to day issues and proactively address areas of personal development. It does not yet, however, provide a sufficiently rigorous means by which the tutorial support for an individual student can be monitored.

p.2

qualifications?

 The college has a centrally held database of staff checks regarding working with vulnerable adults and children, and their qualifications.

p.2

development?

 The college, with the Shaftesbury Society, its parent charity, is actively planning for the future. There have been significant improvements in residential accommodation since the last inspection, for example, creation of single occupancy bedrooms. The Shaftesbury Society has made a substantial investment in improving the physical site of the college. They are awaiting installation and construction of improved site access arrangements.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion