Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jan 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedsuccessfullyconsistentlyrobustimprovingsecureaccurateconsistent
Criticismweaknessineffectivenot clearbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
412
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Date of visit: 16 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Current achievement and standards

 Overall success rates improved in 2005/06. Although pass rates remained close to their 2004/05 levels for GCE AS and A level subjects, retention rates improved and more learners completed their courses successfully. GCE A level success rates are now close to the average for sixth form colleges whereas GCE AS level success rates are slightly below the national average. Value-added data reveal that these success rates represent good achievements for the learners, given their starting points. The college remains in the top 10% of colleges nationally, based on ALPS data. The percentage of high grades is satisfactory. Success rates on GCSE courses have improved significantly and are now well above the national average. The overall success rates conceal significant differences between departments and individual courses. Success rates on courses in the business studies department have improved slightly, but remain

p.1

Attendance and punctuality

 Attendance improved to 86% in 2005/06, contributing to the overall improvement in retention.

p.1

Attendance and punctuality

 The college has made no progress in monitoring and improving learner punctuality and the weakness persists. Procedures for reporting lateness are confusing and ineffective. Heads of department and teachers do not provide sufficient challenge to learners who are late to lessons.

p.1

Quality assurance

 Quality assurance procedures are being implemented more consistently across the college. Departmental self-assessment reports are much more self-critical and provide a secure base for departmental development plans.

p.2

Quality assurance

 The college’s lesson observation procedures have been refined to ensure that judgements on the quality of teaching and learning are both more accurate and more consistent between departments. Observations now enable managers to make a well considered evaluation of teaching and learning, and provide for more robust judgements in departmental self- assessment reports.

p.2

Organisational review

 The college is proceeding with a comprehensive review of organisational structures within the college. A consultation document has recently been circulated to all staff.

p.2

analysis:

 Long Road Sixth Form College is oversubscribed and current projections are for continuing growth in the 16 -19 age group within Cambridge and its hinterland. It is not clear how the college will be able to respond to the challenge of increasing learner numbers, or the role that it will play in 14- 19 developments within the city.

p.2

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion