Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Dec 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedvery highextremelywell plannedeffectivesuccessfulstrengthsecure
Criticisminadequateat riskbelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
669
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Date of visit: 16 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Success rates have continued to improve steadily for students aged 16-18 but are still below the national average at level 3. The college has withdrawn provision in all GCE AS and A level subjects because performance was unsatisfactory. Excluding these results, success rates at level 3 have also improved. Success rates have improved for students aged 19 or over and in 2004/05 were at the national average. Early indications from 2005/06 suggest that the rate of improvement has at least been maintained. The overall success rate in work-based learning programmes has improved significantly from 38% in 2004/05 to 59% in 2005/06 and in brickwork is very high at 92%. In most vocational areas the success rate is at least satisfactory, and where the rate is still low there has been a significant improvement, for example in engineering where the success rate has improved from 0% in the previous two years to 33%.

p.1

Every Child Matters themes

 The college has fully embraced the principles of Every Child Matters. Each section of the college has produced a detailed and useful analysis of how provision contributes to the ECM themes and a separate self-assessment for ECM is to be included in the 2005/06 report. Staff have received extremely effective training and have therefore been able to assemble very convincing evidence of the progress that the college has made. The college has produced a single central record of checks on staff, in accordance with the requirements of the Department for Education and Skills. There are appropriate policies and procedures in place for protecting young people, and the arrangements for looking after vulnerable young people, including those who are at risk of withdrawing from education, are secure. Risk assessments are thorough.

p.1

Key Skills

 In its 2004/05 self-assessment of key skills the college judged its provision as inadequate and the disappointing outcomes for students in external key skills tests confirmed this. Since then there have been a number of important changes to the organisation of key skills, including placing the responsibility for key skills delivery firmly within the vocational teaching areas and giving sector leaders the responsibility for improvement. Staff development activities to support the changes, including the inclusion of key skills sessions in the induction programme for new staff, have been well considered. Student success rates in 2005/06 confirm the effectiveness of these measures. Although at the time of this visit not all of the results had been entered onto the college’s database, there was already a fivefold increase in the number of successful completions.

p.2

Staff development

 The self-assessment report identified staff development as a strength and the visit confirms this. Staff development is well tailored to individual needs and has supported improvements in the quality of teaching and learning. The target for the number of qualified teachers is high, but has been met. Staff induction is thorough. Monitoring of staff development outcomes, particularly through observations of teaching and learning, is well planned and executed. The analysis of lesson observations is thorough and the resulting profile confirms that teaching has improved in areas where student success rates have also improved.

p.2

analysis:

 The college continues to make significant improvements to its accommodation and resources which reflect its mission to be: ‘First choice for learning and skills’. Since the last AAV the ‘SmartLIFE’ centre, has been built and is now in full operation. This exciting new facility provides large numbers of trainees and employees with the opportunity to learn about modern methods of construction. Its purpose is well matched to the growth area of construction in Cambridgeshire and the Eastern Counties. The college is now involved in five Centres of Vocational Excellence (CoVEs), in leadership and management (lead college), manufacturing, sports coaching, construction and in health and care.

p.2

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion