Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Dec 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedstrongpositiverobusteffectiveimproving
Criticisminadequatenot yettoo lowlowdeclinedconcernyet tonot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings523w−31
  • What needs to improve253w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
776
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 33%

Full report text

Date of visit: 18 October 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Retention rates for 16-18 at levels 1 and 3

College data for 2005-06 indicate that overall retention rates for 16-18 year olds show an upward trend of improvement at all levels in comparison to 2004-05. Retention rates at levels 1, 2 and 3 are 84%, 80% and 77% respectively. This is an improvement at level 1 of 9% points, at level 2 of 4% points and at level 3 of 8% points. Individual courses are receiving further attention where performance is too low. Attendance has improved. During the previous inspection in 2003, recorded attendance was 77%, the college average for 2005-06 was 85%.

p.1

Adult success rates on level 1 and short courses

Success rates were significantly low for level 1 and short courses (between 5- 24 weeks) in 2004-05, affecting around 900 enrolments in each area. Success rates declined between 2003 and 2005. This continues to be a concern. At the time of the AAV the summary figures for success rates on such courses were not yet complete.

p.1

Work based learning

In work based learning, success rates on national vocational qualifications (NVQ’s) have improved to 61%. This is an increase of 10% points compared with 2004-05, just above the national average. The percentage of achievement of advanced frameworks is similar to 2003-04. For apprentices, achievement rates have improved gradually for the past three years but remain below the national average of 53%. The achievement of NVQ at level 2 is much higher at 65%, compared with the national average of 44%. Overall key skills pass rates have improved at level 1 to 63%. At level 2, pass rates are 39% overall. Pass rates are good in construction, care, electrical and mechanical engineering and computing. In other areas the pass rates are low. The college has made a number of positive changes to improve key skills teaching within curriculum areas. These are having a beneficial impact on learners.

p.1

Teaching and learning

The college has made a number of changes to improve the quality of teaching and learning; these include the appointment of 5 advanced practitioners and substantial training for lesson observers. The college has implemented a number of strategies to develop teachers skills further through team teaching, mentoring and extensive support where this is needed. From 201 internal observations carried out in 2005-06 outcomes indicated that 72% of teaching was good or better, 25% was satisfactory and 3% was inadequate. The characteristics of lessons are not analysed in the draft self assessment report for 2005-06. There is further good collaboration with similar colleges and external training of observers designed to achieve consistency.

p.2

Enrolment to appropriate courses and take up of learners’ support

The recruitment process is now more thorough, bringing more focus on the appropriate course and length of study for each learner. The take up of additional learning support which was low at the previous inspection at 58% has improved to 85%. However, the college has yet to fully evaluate the impact of this support on learners’ achievement. The support is available in many ways. A ‘literacy’ and ‘numeracy’ hour has been introduced on level 1 courses and for some level 2 courses for 2006-07.

p.2

adults and improve achievement and standards overall

College managers have taken robust action and conducted a detailed analysis of all curriculum areas and courses. They have focussed on identifying more effective modes of study, improving attendance and retention rates, the management of courses and improving quality of teaching as areas for further work. The impact of these measures on achievement and standards for adult learners, and all learners, is not clear at the time of this visit as all achievement data for 2005-06 has not yet been received.

p.2

The self assessment process

The self assessment process is well established; staff at all levels are involved. The 2004-05 self assessment report is succinct and includes information on key skills achievements for each curriculum area. Course reviews are now held every term to monitor the progress against development plans more closely and identify issues much earlier. The outcomes are moderated by a panel to ensure consistency and are presented to governors for further scrutiny. In the self assessment report for 2004-5 most curriculum grades are self critical in their evaluations, based on available evidence.

p.3

Employer engagement

The college has made considerable investment and has advanced plans in promoting training to employers. There are strong and productive links in many sectors, particularly in engineering, with an international employer.

p.3

14-16 vocational provision

The achievements of around 800 learners are in the process of being evaluated. There are some good individual examples of progression to college courses and the overall rate was 49% in 2004-05. Good links with schools exist, some college staff are teaching at local schools and in the 14-16 vocational centre.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion