Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Jan 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingimprovedclearly
Criticisminsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings430w+15
  • Leadership59w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
479
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%Leadership 12%

Full report text

Date of visit: 23 November 2006

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Learners’ achievements

 success, retention and pass rates are broadly similar to the national averages for similar colleges  apprenticeship framework achievement rates are improving rapidly. At the time of the inspection they were similar to national averages for apprentices and above the average for advanced apprenticeships  the FE key skills success rate for application of number and communications at levels 1 and 2 is improving rapidly; in 2005/06 it was well above the national average. Key skills achievements in work-based learning are also improving

p.1

Responsiveness

 the college continues to be highly responsive to employers and the needs of the regional economy: o good quality training is provided for a large number of businesses across North Yorkshire o it has developed new areas of work in response to market needs, for example its expanding construction provision, the new aviation academy established at Leeds-Bradford airport, and its work in provision relevant to a rural economy o college full-time learner numbers and the number of apprentices in training are growing rapidly; up 55% and 70% over a four year period o the college works productively with many partners and makes use of a diverse range of funding. The capital infrastructure to support its growth is of good quality o the pilot work done in 2005/06 to ensure learners are equipped with the skills valued by employers is being expanded this year

p.1

Monitoring of learners’ progress

 the college is currently evaluating how well it monitors learners’ progress and challenges them to do better, for example by placing greater emphasis on the evaluation of the quality of its individual tutorial provision.

p.2

Strategic management

 management defines its strategic priorities clearly, has established a well defined process of ensuring that these priorities are addressed during divisional planning and closely monitors the implementation of these plans  key areas for development are robustly managed, leading to improvement. For example, key skills achievements, identified as a key area for improvement last year, have improved markedly

p.2

Quality assurance and professional development

 the college has increased the proportion of its teachers who are observed teaching. Lesson observation proforma are completed in detail and the findings lead, where appropriate, to professional development. In some instances insufficient attention is given to what the students learned during lesson observation  The professional development programme concentrates appropriately on issues related to teaching and learning  Self-assessment reports are completed in detail. They give close attention to learners’ achievements within their analysis, and judgements are supported well by evidence. In some cases, teaching and learning and learners’ achievements are not given sufficient prominence in the overall findings. Under-performing courses are closely reviewed and appropriate change implemented

p.2

Quality assurance and professional development

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion