Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Bearpark Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Dec 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Eric Jackson
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DH7 7AU
- Name on report verified
Bearpark Primary School
- URN verified
114129
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2005.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006 p.9
- The staff will help you with this so that you become more skilled in English, and more confident and independent in all your work. p.11
- Pupils feel safe, behave well and try hard in their work because they enjoy it. p.4
- The current Year 6 is maintaining the improving trend; improved progress in learning is clear in pupils’ work across the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At its last inspection in November 2005, the school had important weaknesses in standards, expectations of the pupils’ progress and the leadership and management of the school. p.4
- This led to sharply focused development in the weaknesses identified, especially in raising expectations of pupils’ progress. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards in all aspects of English but especially in handwriting. p.5
- Increase pupils' capacity to work independently in lessons. p.5
- Extend the improvements in teaching and learning in English, mathematics and science to the rest of the curriculum. p.5
- Achievement is satisfactory, but standards are below average at the end of Years 2 and Year 6. p.5
- Progress in lessons is satisfactory and sometimes good, particularly for older pupils. p.5
- Children in Reception make good progress in personal, social and emotional development because the staff help them to develop their social skills quickly. p.5
- By the end of Reception, children have made satisfactory progress but are still below average in key areas of learning. p.5
- Results in Year 2 tests are usually below average in reading, writing and mathematics, but vary year-on-year with the attainment at entry of each group of pupils. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development5
“Pupils’ personal development remains a strength.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,516
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Bearpark Primary School
p.1
114129 Unique Reference Number Durham Local Authority 294559 Inspection number 7 °8 December 2006 Inspection dates Eric Jackson Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Colliery Road School address Primary Type of school Bearpark, Durham Community School category County Durham, DH7 7AU 4 °11 Age range of pupils 0191 3848958 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0191 3831904 Fax number 102 Number on roll (school) Mr Jeff Teasdale Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Les Owen Headteacher 1 November 2005 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 294559 7 °8 December 2006 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a small school serving an ex-mining village on the rural outskirts of Durham. Poverty levels locally are in the highest 20% nationally, and the proportion of pupils taking free school meals is above average. Many children start in the Reception class with levels of attainment well below those typical for their age. The proportion of pupils identified with learning difficulties and disabilities is above average. Almost all the pupils are White British. The school has achieved the Healthy School standard and the Activemark for sport and physical education (PE).
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
In accordance with section 13 (5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement. At its last inspection in November 2005, the school had important weaknesses in standards, expectations of the pupils’ progress and the leadership and management of the school. The staff and governors immediately instituted a thorough review of the school’s practice, supported well by the local authority. This led to sharply focused development in the weaknesses identified, especially in raising expectations of pupils’ progress. Leadership is now satisfactory with some good features and management is satisfactory because rigorous monitoring, evaluation and development planning procedures have been put in place by senior managers and governors; these ensure that the changes work. Pupils’ achievement has been raised and strengths in pupils’
p.4
Grade: 3
personal development maintained. Many parents feel that it is a fantastic school and say that their children love it. Improvement has been good in the last year and the school is well placed to continue getting better. It is now a satisfactory school with some good features. Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. Despite some good progress, standards are below those expected by the time children enter Year 1. Standards in Year 2 tests were below average in 2005 and at a similar level in 2006. These results reflect satisfactory progress since the entered Year 1. The school’s results in the 2006 national tests for 11-year-olds showed that standards were below the levels expected nationally; nevertheless, in mathematics and science they improved well over the previous year, despite 65% of the pupils having learning difficulties and disabilities. Standards in English fell. Nonetheless, overall pupils’ achievement was at least satisfactory given their starting
p.4
Grade: 3
points. This shows good improvement compared to the pupils’ achievement in 2005. The current Year 6 is maintaining the improving trend; improved progress in learning is clear in pupils’ work across the school. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Teaching has improved since the last inspection and the teachers’ expectations of pupils’ progress are higher, except in handwriting. The planning of lessons is based clearly on what staff know of pupils’ needs. This helps pupils to learn effectively, especially in the older classes. A key strength is in the staff’s good support and guidance for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. Pupils feel safe, behave well and try hard in their work because they enjoy it. However, teachers do not always expect pupils to identify, fetch and return the resources they need to support their own learning. The school provides good levels of care for its pupils and required safety and
p.4
Grade: 3
safeguarding procedures are in place. The curriculum is satisfactory, and there are strengths in art and design and physical education. These add well to pupils’ good personal development, including their good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. However, improved teaching and learning methods in English, mathematics and science have not been fully extended to the rest of the curriculum. Pupils make a satisfactory contribution to the school and local community, and are satisfactorily prepared for the next stage of their learning. 2 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards in all aspects of English but especially in handwriting. • Increase pupils' capacity to work independently in lessons. • Extend the improvements in teaching and learning in English, mathematics and science to the rest of the curriculum.
p.5
Grade: 3
Achievement is satisfactory, but standards are below average at the end of Years 2 and Year 6. Progress in lessons is satisfactory and sometimes good, particularly for older pupils. Children in Reception make good progress in personal, social and emotional development because the staff help them to develop their social skills quickly. By the end of Reception, children have made satisfactory progress but are still below average in key areas of learning. Results in Year 2 tests are usually below average in reading, writing and mathematics, but vary year-on-year with the attainment at entry of each group of pupils. A falling trend in mathematics has been reversed by improved provision this year. Results in Year 6 national tests improved well in mathematics and science in 2006, although still below average, but fell in English. Improved progress is clear in pupils’ work across the school in response to teachers’ higher expectations. Pupils with learning
p.5
Grade: 3
difficulties and disabilities often make good progress because they receive good support. There is no significant difference between boys’ and girls’ achievement. Some pupils achieve good levels in art and design, PE and information and communication technology (ICT).
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils’ personal development remains a strength. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is also good. For example, the gentle singing of a carol in assembly by the whole school was a significant moment of calm reverence. Pupils rightly say that they really enjoy being here, that they feel very safe, and that rare instances of bullying are swiftly dealt with by the staff. The staff work hard to establish good working relationships with pupils, using rewards effectively. Pupils repay this by behaving well and concentrating on their work. Pupils understand how to live healthily, and enjoy the many opportunities for physical exercise, including a ‘wake and shake’ session for Year 4 and 5 pupils every morning. The school works hard to try and make sure that all pupils learn to their full potential, and this is valued by parents. Attendance is average. 3 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching has improved since the last inspection, although still satisfactory overall. The key improvement has been that teachers and support staff now expect pupils to make the progress of which they are capable, although some do not insist that pupils present their work carefully enough. Staff have developed good questioning techniques that involve pupils well, although some opportunities are missed to allow pupils to discuss their work in pairs or groups. Assessment through questioning is reinforced by helpful marking in English and mathematics. Accuracy in assessment means that planning for lessons in English, mathematics and science successfully addresses the needs of pupils of different ages and abilities. Older pupils say that they now understand clearly what they are supposed to learn, and how to improve. The pace of most lessons is brisk, especially for older pupils. While pupils are reminded that work
p.6
Grade: 3
must be completed in the lesson, not all have learned how to work independently.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum meets requirements satisfactorily, including in Reception where good new outdoor resources have improved children’s outdoor learning. There are good enrichment activities for all pupils using the art and design skills of a support assistant and an experienced governor. The school has links with a wide range of sports clubs, and uses visits out of school well to develop pupils’ cultural understanding. The focus on raising standards in core subjects has been correct, but new planning systems have not yet been used effectively in other subjects. This means that the school does not acknowledge sufficiently how good children’s achievement is in some of these areas. The school offers a homework club that is used productively by many children.
p.6
Grade: 2
Care, support and guidance combine to produce another strength of the school. All required safeguarding procedures are in place. Parents feel that the level of care for their children is very high, and say that no child is ever turned away. Some of those who have children with learning difficulties and disabilities say that the help their children receive increases their self-confidence so that they enjoy learning. Support for these pupils is good, and for some with the greatest need, it is excellent. Other pupils accept, support and value those with learning difficulties and disabilities, following the staff’s good example. Guidance and support have improved in lessons and in teachers’ marking of work, contributing well to pupils’ improving progress. 4 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management have improved to be satisfactory, with good features in leadership. The headteacher and assistant headteacher have worked with the whole staff to turn the weaknesses round. An important innovation is an effective system to monitor pupils’ progress term-by-term. Governors accepted that they had not challenged the school enough in the past. A group of six governors has worked tirelessly with the school and local authority to monitor, evaluate and plan improvement more effectively to bring about key changes. The good partnerships with parents, other local schools, the local authority and Durham University have been helpful in this. Governors say that they are now much more ‘switched on’. The school certainly knows its strengths and weaknesses as its latest self-evaluation shows. The local authority has provided high quality support to build teachers’ skills and confidence in taking
p.7
Grade: 3
control of and working through the post-inspection action plan. The headteacher explained the school’s new-found energy and confidence in saying, ‘We decided that it is up to us to improve our children’s learning and standards. Other people can help, but we have to do it!’ This approach has led to the improving picture outlined in this report that has put the school in a good position to continue to improve. 5 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006 .
p.7
Grade: 3
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Bearpark Primary School Colliery Road Bearpark Durham County Durham DH7 7AU 11 December 2006 Dear Children Thank you for your pleasant Bearpark welcome when I visited your school. You will remember that I came to see how well your school had made progress since its last inspection in November 2005. You were very helpful in answering my questions, letting me see your work, and telling me about your school. You have kept up the pattern of good behaviour from the last inspection, obviously enjoy being at Bearpark, and get on well with your friends and the staff. I enjoyed hearing you sing ‘Little Donkey’ in assembly. Older children told me that their lessons are more interesting and that they know more about what to do to improve. You certainly know a good deal about staying safe, and about keeping healthy and fit. I think that the school has made good improvements and looks as if it will carry on getting better. The staff have worked hard to help you do better in your work. I think that you could
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
help as well by making your handwriting and your work neater and tidier, trying harder in reading and writing, and learning how to get the things you need in lessons for yourself and how to put them back when you have finished. The staff will help you with this so that you become more skilled in English, and more confident and independent in all your work. I wish you all the best for your futures, wherever they may take you. I also hope you have a good Christmas and that the New Year is good for you, your family, your friends and your school. Yours sincerely Eric Jackson Lead Inspector. 9 Inspection Report: Bearpark Primary School, 7 °8 December 2006
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion