Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Camrose Primary With Nursery

Inspected 15 Jun 2006 · published 10 Jul 2006 · URN 102188

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

David Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Jones

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HA8 6JH

  • Name on report verified

    Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School

  • URN verified

    102188

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressimprovedpositiveexceptionallyeffectiveoutstandingeffectivelyvery high
Criticismbelownot alwaysinadequatepoorweaknesseslowinconsistenciesvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1298w+85
  • What needs to improve1180w+51

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,444
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Inspection Report Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School

p.1

102188 Unique Reference Number Harrow LEA LEA 294391 Inspection number 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 Inspection dates David Jones HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 which gives Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools the authority to cause any school to be inspected. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.1

St David's Drive School address Middle deemed primary Type of school Edgeware Maintained School category Middlesex HA8 6JH 3 to 12 Age range of pupils 020 8952 3272 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 020 8381 2017 Fax number 197 Number on roll Mr Steven Isaacs Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Gill McKeever Headteacher 28 June 2004 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 294391 14 June 2006 - 3 to 12 15 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School is of average size. The school has 197 full-time pupils on roll and a further 45 children attend the nursery part-time. Pupils transfer to local secondary schools at the end of Year 7. The proportion of pupils that speak English as an additional language is very high, as is the proportion of refugees and asylum seekers. A small but increasing number of pupils are at an early stage of language acquisition. Pupils represent a wide range of ethnic backgrounds. As with other areas of north London pupil mobility is above average; 17 pupils joined the school on 1 April 2006, six of these pupils had not received any primary education in the United Kingdom. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is above the national average; the social and economic characteristics of the area the school serves does not compare favourably with the national picture. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties

p.3

Description of the school

and disabilities is well above average as is the proportion with a statement of special educational need. The school buildings were refurbished to a very high standard as part of a Private Finance Initiative organised by the local authority in 2005.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

In accordance with section 13 (4) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures, since it is now providing an acceptable standard of education for its pupils. Self-evaluation is good and the school has correctly identified the aspects of provision which require further development; for example, the need to raise standards and support the pupils with below average literacy skills Standards of attainment are now close to those found nationally but pupils make good progress. This is the result of the significant improvement in the quality of teaching which is now good. The quality of provision in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory and pupils make appropriate progress. The care, guidance and support provided for the pupils are satisfactory. The personal development of the pupils is good and their behaviour is good. Most pupils are now happy to come to school; they enjoy their

p.4

Grade: 3

lessons, feel secure and display positive attitudes to learning. The poor attendance of a small number of pupils needs to be improved. The pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Leadership and management are good. Building on the effective leadership provided by two acting headteachers since September 2005 the new headteacher and senior staff have raised achievement and secured a calm and orderly learning environment. Governance is satisfactory. The school has made good progress since the inspection that required the introduction of special measures and now gives satisfactory value for money. The school's capacity to improve is good.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards by focussing on the development of pupils' literacy skills. • Continue to refine the support and learning opportunities for those learning English as an additional language as well as for those pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. • Maintain the recent improvements in attendance

p.4

Grade: 3

Attainment on entry is well below average and often very low. Pupils in the Foundation Stage generally make satisfactory progress and their mathematical development is good. In Key Stage 1, progress is satisfactory although standards of reading and writing are below what might be expected for their age. The 2005 Key Stage 2 National Tests results in English, mathematics and science were well below the national average. In lessons, standards of attainment are generally below average; however, evidence from the school's robust assessment data base confirms that more than 80% of pupils now make reasonable progress and half of them make good progress. 2 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 The quality of written work in English varies with the pupils' grasp of spoken language and the quality of presentation in their exercise books remains variable. Subject specific

p.4

Grade: 3

vocabulary is often used accurately but many pupils struggle to develop these terms into coherent sentences. However, Year 7 pupils studying Shakespeare were able to display a good understanding of the major characters in 'A Midsummer's Nights Dream'. In mathematics, the pupils' understanding of number, data, shape and space is at least satisfactory. The school has sound evidence that the majority of pupils are likely to achieve their mathematics targets. The introduction of investigative science has helped improve the pupils' understanding and use of scientific vocabulary; for example, in a Year 4 science lesson some pupils were able to explain how thermometers were graded in response to well directed questions.

p.5

Grade: 2

The school is a calm and well-ordered place. The pupils' attitudes and behaviour have improved considerably and were good in all lessons. Movement around the school is supervised well. The pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory and sporting activities provide good opportunities for health and social development. The number of exclusions has fallen dramatically and is now low. The rate of attendance has improved to 93.8% since the start of the summer term 2006; however, a small number of individuals attend irregularly. The pupils' interest in mathematics and the school's improved provision for information and communication technology are helping to develop a range of skills that contribute to their future economic well-being.

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of teaching has improved significantly and is now good; as a result most pupils make good progress. The best teaching was underpinned by high expectations and warm working relationships that made for good behaviour and positive attitudes to work. Lively and interesting activities matched the pupils' learning needs, for example in a Year 2 science lesson on living organisms where pupils were encouraged to develop their questioning skills. In other good lessons there was a strong emphasis on the development of speaking and listening skills so that pupils were encouraged to explain their thinking. Classroom assistants are generally well directed and most understand how best to deploy their skills to support both teachers and pupils. Group work was generally well used to match tasks and activities to the pupils' needs and earlier learning. 3 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

The curriculum meets all statutory requirements. A greater emphasis on investigations is helping to develop the pupils' thinking skills. Plans are in place to develop work with the local specialist science secondary school. The successful introduction of French in Years 4 to 7 has added to the pupils' enjoyment of learning. Satisfactory support is provided for pupils with a range of educational needs. However, lesson planning does not always make clear how the pupils' quite varied literacy difficulties are to be addressed. The range of pupils learning English as an additional language continues to grow and the school's overall approach to inclusion is not yet fully developed. Very good use is made of specialist physical education instructors to support work-force remodelling while providing an outstanding curriculum experience for all pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2. This excellent tuition is being extended and provides a major

p.6

Grade: 3

contribution to the Healthy Schools agenda whilst inspiring a vibrant competitive atmosphere in each class.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school's policies and procedures help to ensure pupils' safety and security. Effective whole-school assessment and tracking procedures have been introduced this academic year. This robust assessment information is used to track the progress of individuals and groups of pupils, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities. Marking and planning still display some inconsistencies so that pupils are not always clear what they have to do to improve. Most pupils were unaware of either their targets or of how well they were doing. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are appropriately cared for but they make satisfactory rather than good progress. The school council has made a positive contribution to the discussions on healthy eating and outside play facilities. The school works well in partnership with other agencies to help ensure pupils learn and make good progress.

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The new headteacher has quickly built on the good work of her predecessors. A strong leadership team have helped to secure a sense of purpose and community among the staff. The headteacher's vision for the school is clear to all. Good self-evaluation takes into account the views of all major stakeholders and senior managers have a very good understanding of the school's strengths and weaknesses. The monitoring and evaluation of performance are secure with effective links made between lesson observation and the use of the robust assessment database developed effectively under the direction of the deputy headteacher. The governors have worked hard to secure the leadership of the school. 4 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 The school's links with the community and other educational institutions are satisfactory. Curriculum leadership is satisfactory and the new roles and responsibilities

p.6

Grade: 2

approved by the governors for September 2006 will bring experience and strength to the leadership of the Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1. Staff and pupils know what is expected of them and are confident that they will be supported and encouraged to give of their best. 5 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Little Stanmore Nursery, First and Middle School, 14 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils As some of you may remember I have been visiting your school for over a year and in that time I have seen it improve a great deal. Here are some of the things I think are really good: * Your behaviour is good and you enjoy your lessons.* The teachers work very hard and have helped you make good progress.* The school is a calm and friendly place. You told me that most bullying had stopped or was dealt with quickly.* Your new Headteacher Mrs McKeever, runs the school well. There are still things to do and you can help by coming to school regularly. When you receive your work back from the teacher you need to check you understand what you have to do to improve. It is important you read as much as possible as this will help you with your literacy.I have enjoyed meeting you regularly and wish you well for the future. Yours sincerely David Jones H M Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion