Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Longmeadow Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 9 Feb 2007

Inspected 9 Feb 2007 · published 9 Mar 2007 · URN 135083

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Longmeadow Primary School on 9 Feb 2007, led by Michael Milton. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 9 Mar 2007. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael Milton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Feb 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Milton

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SG2 8LT

  • Name on report verified

    Longmeadow Primary School

  • URN verified

    135083

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressexcellenteffectiveenjoyexceptionallystrengthsconsistentlyexemplary
Criticisminsufficientinadequatebelownot yetweaknessesfailsat risklow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1624w+80
  • What needs to improve1156w+31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,742
about usual (typical 2787)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report Longmeadow Primary School

p.1

135083 Unique Reference Number HERTFORDSHIRE Local Authority 294265 Inspection number 8 °9 February 2007 Inspection dates Michael Milton Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Oaks Cross School address Primary Type of school Broadwater, Stevenage Community School category Hertfordshire SG2 8LT 3 °11 Age range of pupils 01438 351087 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01438 210544 Fax number 470 Number on roll (school) Mr J Gardner Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Miss L Hodgson Headteacher Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 294265 8 °9 February 2007 3°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Longmeadow Primary School has a nursery and is much bigger than the average primary school. It opened in September 2005 with a new headteacher, and was formed by the amalgamation of an infant school and junior school that were next to each other on the same site. It is part of a federation with a nearby primary school, and the two separate schools have the same federated governing body. The pupils are from a wide variety of backgrounds. A significant number come from low social and economic background. Most pupils are from White British heritage. The number of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is average. An average number of pupils have learning difficulties and/or disabilities.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007

p.3

Grade: 3

Longmeadow provides a satisfactory education. It is an improving school with some good features and clear areas for improvement. The headteacher provides good leadership and has achieved much in just over four terms to create a common ethos and to introduce many improvements which are starting to raise standards. Pupils' achievement is satisfactory, although it varies according to the quality of teaching. Children's standards are well below average on entry to the nursery where they make good progress. During Reception, children's progress is slower but steady. The quality of provision in the Foundation Stage, including teaching, is satisfactory. Pupils' standards are below average when they enter Year 1, but they make good progress as a result of effective teaching and reach average standards by the end of Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics. During Key Stage 2, pupils make adequate progress because teaching is satisfactory, and they reach average standards in English,

p.4

Grade: 3

mathematics and science by the end of Year 6. The headteacher has introduced an excellent method of tracking the term-by-term progress of individual pupils and classes in reading, writing and mathematics. This information showed that in the school's first year pupils' progress was erratic during Key Stage 2. As a result, a number of improvements are being made in different classes including pupils assessing their own learning, marking that helps pupils to understand how to improve their standards, and target setting for individual pupils. However, these are not yet consistent in all classes. Since last September, a good range of changes has been made to improve pupils' progress in English. As a result of these and other changes, pupils' progress is improving. Pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities make good progress. Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. Their behaviour is good and

p.4

Grade: 3

they usually listen well during lessons. They enjoy school and, during the inspection, had enormous fun in the snow during lunchtime. They feel safe at school and know how to keep safe in different situations. The satisfactory curriculum covers all of the National Curriculum requirements and a start has been made to making some good links between subjects, as when Year 5 pupils make their own information books about the Aztecs. There is some good enrichment through residential visits, music, links with secondary schools and extra-curricular sports but the curriculum does not yet stimulate and encourage learning sufficiently in each class. Pupils have healthy lifestyles. There is good quality care, guidance and support, especially for vulnerable pupils. The school makes a good contribution to community cohesion by, for example, providing after-school art classes for parents and their children, singing at a local home for the

p.4

Grade: 3

elderly, and supporting local charities. Leadership and management are satisfactory, with an effective governing body. The school's track record so far demonstrates a good capacity for further improvement because its accurate evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses is used to select its well chosen targets for improvement, and these are increasing pupils' rates of progress. The school gives satisfactory value for money. The federation enhances the leadership 2 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007 capacity of the school, and is effective in helping the school to improve the quality of its care and education.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Secure good provision throughout the Foundation Stage so that children's learning is consistently good. • Build on the improvements to target setting and assessment to secure whole-school approaches that help pupils learn as much as possible. • Improve teaching so that it is consistently good throughout the school. • Devise a curriculum that provides each class with stimulating, creative learning activities.

p.5

Grade: 3

On entry to the nursery, children's knowledge and skills are low in language and communication, mathematical development, and personal and social skills. Although children have some good opportunities for choosing activities in the Foundation Stage, there are times when adults do not help enough to focus these activities on the children's particular learning needs. During the Foundation Stage, children's achievement is satisfactory and best in the nursery. Pupils' achievement is good during Key Stage 1 and by the end of Year 2 their standards are average overall, although girls' standards are significantly higher than those of boys. Pupils make good progress during Key Stage 1 because they know their individual targets for improvement. Teaching is good and steps are being taken to use resources and teaching methods that appeal to boys. During the 2005-6 school year, pupils' achievement was erratic in Years 3 to 5 with good achievement during Year 6. Since

p.5

Grade: 3

last September, a good number of improvements have been made to teaching, the curriculum and assessment and so pupils are achieving more this year. The school has set challenging targets for the Year 6 pupils' results in 2007. Pupils who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities achieve well because of the good range of provision and the effective work of teaching assistants. The achievement of pupils from minority ethnic groups is similar to that of other pupils.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development and well-being, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural aspects, are good. Their attendance is satisfactory. Pupils know that any isolated incidents of bullying are quickly dealt with. All are confident that they can approach an adult for help with any problems. Most pupils listen carefully in lessons and do their best although, at times, some lose their concentration when teaching fails to capture their interest. When given the opportunity, pupils work well in groups. 3 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007 Pupils' preparation for their next stage of education is sound with their average standards in the key skills of literacy and numeracy. As well as one swimming lesson and two physical education lessons each week, many pupils take part in the wide range of sporting activities at lunchtime and after school. Pupils make a good contribution to the wider community by fundraising for a wide

p.5

Grade: 2

range of charities and participating in local events, such as 'Stevenage in Bloom'. Pupils are involved in the school council, although they have insufficient opportunities for responsibility in running its meetings.

p.6

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory overall. Although there is good teaching in the nursery, there is some teaching in the Foundation Stage that does not have a sharp enough focus on what children are meant to learn. In Key Stages 1 and 2, strengths include good relationships, well-structured lesson plans and the sharing of learning objectives with pupils. Teaching assistants are usually effective in helping pupils to learn although occasionally they are not actively involved during whole-class teaching. Weaker aspects of teaching in a few lessons include pupils being required to sit on the carpet listening for too long, the pace of learning flagging while resources are distributed, and activities that do not grasp pupils' interest. In an exemplary lesson, the teaching was bright and animated, and pupils assessed their own work against the success criteria they had been given at the start of the lesson. Some good steps are

p.6

Grade: 3

being taken to give pupils more responsibility for their learning in some classes.

p.6

Grade: 3

The broad, balanced curriculum meets the learning needs and interests of pupils to a satisfactory level. The curriculum is enriched by a wide range of educational visits, residential visits for Years 3 to 6, and after-school clubs that pupils enjoy. There is a strong emphasis on provision for English and mathematics and other strengths include provision for art, music and sport. The Foundation Stage's curriculum follows national guidance although learning activities are not always sufficiently interesting and purposeful. Imaginative play is not well developed in the Reception classes. Provision for pupils who speak English as an additional language is satisfactory. The school has a policy for supporting pupils who are gifted and talented but its implementation is at an early stage.

p.6

Grade: 2

Provision to ensure pupils' health and safety and child protection are comprehensive and thorough. There are good procedures for encouraging better attendance. Close 4 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007 links with a good range of professionals and external agencies ensure very good support for vulnerable pupils and those who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and this has a positive impact on their progress. The systems for academic guidance are designed well and their implementation by individual teachers, though still inconsistent, is improving. Pupils in Years 1 to 6 have detailed, individual targets for literacy and numeracy, and these are now regularly checked and updated. Detailed tracking of pupils' term-by-term progress is being regularly analysed to identify any pupils at risk of underachievement, and these pupils then receive additional support. As yet, however,

p.6

Grade: 2

there has been insufficient time for these excellent systems to have their full impact on pupils' progress.

p.7

Grade: 3

The headteacher has introduced an excellent system for measuring pupils' progress each term and this information is used to raise standards and improve teaching. The leadership team is new, and its effectiveness is developing. The principal of the federation and the deputy headteacher work closely with the headteacher and are making a good contribution. The team responsible for the provision of English has made a good range of improvements in a short time but is realistic about the amount of work still needed to raise standards across the school. Parents, pupils and governors are involved in the good procedures for the self-evaluation of a wide range of the school's work. The federated governing body, ably led by the chair, is determined to ensure that the school's key priority is to raise standards. It functions well as a critical friend of the school, and governors carry out visits to check on the quality of education.

p.7

Grade: 3

The school has started a good range of improvements since it opened just over four terms ago, and these are beginning to result in improvements to pupils' progress and in higher standards. 5 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

12 February 2007 Dear Pupils Longmeadow Primary School, Oaks Cross, Broadwater, Stevenage, SG2 8LT Mrs Smith, Mr Messer and I really enjoyed visiting your school last week and meeting you, Miss Hodgson, the staff and some of the governors. We are very grateful to so many of you and your parents for getting to school despite the heavy snow. It was interesting to hear from you that you like school, feel safe and secure, enjoy the residential trips and know what your targets are to improve your work. You behave well and are usually keen to do your best work. Year 6 pupils worked well together during their Victorian afternoon. You make good progress with your learning in some years and steady progress in other years. This is because teaching is at least satisfactory and some lessons are really good and help you to learn a great deal. Miss Hodgson and the staff are working hard to help you all to make good progress all of the time. Your teachers are using

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

different ways of setting targets, improving marking and helping you to assess your own work so that you can learn more. The school is improving what you learn by, for example, making interesting links between subjects as Year 5 pupils did when they made their Aztec information books. You have good opportunities for art, physical education and music but we think the rest of the curriculum could be made more interesting for you. The main things Miss Hodgson and the staff need to do to make the school even better are to: • Bring teaching and learning throughout the Foundation Stage up to the standard of the best lessons we saw. • Help you understand how to improve your work even more by making sure all your teachers check your targets and mark and assess your work really well. • Develop teaching so that lessons are always good throughout the school. • Provide each class with learning activities in all subjects that you enjoy and find interesting.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

You can help the school to get even better by continuing to behave well and to do your best work, and by thinking carefully about how you can improve your work. With best wishes for the rest of the school year, Mike Milton (Lead inspector) 9 Inspection Report: Longmeadow Primary School, 8 °9 February 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion