Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Priory Junior School

Inspected 1 Feb 2007 · published 1 Mar 2007 · URN 122531

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael Best

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    1 Feb 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Best

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    NG4 7LE

  • Name on report verified

    Priory Junior School

  • URN verified

    122531

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedenjoyexceptionallyimprovingeffectiveeffectivelypositivesuccessfully
Criticismshortcomingsinadequatebelownot consistentlyweaknesseslackstoo fewnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1513w+59
  • What needs to improve1119w+24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,601
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 42%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

122531 Unique Reference Number NOTTINGHAMSHIRE Local Authority 292426 Inspection number 31 January °1 February 2007 Inspection dates Michael Best Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Priory Road School address Junior Type of school Gedling, Gedling Community School category Nottingham NG4 7LE 7 °11 Age range of pupils 0115 9526100 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0115 9526500 Fax number 200 Number on roll (school) Mrs Anne Baldry Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Judith Wilkin Headteacher 20 January 2003 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 292426 31 January °1 February 2007 7°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is smaller in size than most primary schools. It serves an established area of privately owned and rented homes in a former coal mining area on the outskirts of Nottingham. The prosperity of the area is broadly average. Most pupils transfer from the nearby infant school where they reach generally above average standards in their end of Year 2 assessments. Pupil mobility is below average. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is lower than in most other schools. The number of pupils who have a statement of special educational need (SEN), is below the national average. The proportions of pupils whose home language is not English or who are from minority ethnic groups are below national averages.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.3

Grade: 3

Inspectors agree with the school that its overall effectiveness is satisfactory. The school is improving because new procedures for assessing and tracking pupils' progress are raising teachers' expectations and improving standards. The school's leaders and governors share a secure vision for the development of the school which is clearly focused on promoting pupils' personal development and well-being, and improving standards. The school's plans for its future are in line with national priorities. Although these and other developments, particularly in forging meaningful links between subjects, have helped to raise standards overall in the last three years, their general impact has been satisfactory rather than good. Achievement is satisfactory. This is because the school's analysis of the information available about pupils' progress has not been rigorous enough in identifying how to improve and maintain their

p.4

Grade: 3

achievement. Analysis of 2006 statutory test papers indicated weaknesses in pupils' scientific enquiry and thinking skills, and their interpretation of written problems. With improved information now available to managers and staff, the school has increased the targets for pupils to reach in the statutory tests in 2007 and 2008. The actions taken to improve teaching are starting to show through in pupils' work and indicate an upturn in pupils' achievement. The school provides satisfactory value for money and has a satisfactory capacity for further improvement. Inspection evidence confirms the positive impact of teachers' and learners' efforts to raise standards in the present Year 6 group. Teachers' latest assessments of pupils' work indicate that standards of work are generally above average. Pupils are now making at least satisfactory and often good progress because teachers are providing them with greater challenge. The increased emphasis on developing the use and

p.4

Grade: 3

application of skills and knowledge is evident in pupils' increased confidence in approaching problem-solving situations. Pupils' success and enjoyment of learning is reflected in their sustained attention in lessons, considerate behaviour and good attendance. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Teachers have improved their identification and monitoring of those pupils needing specific support to reach and maintain a higher standard in their work. Their marking of pupils' work lacks consistency. Pupils know their targets for improvement but some are unsure of what these targets mean or what they need to do to improve. The curriculum is satisfactory. The school's good provision for extra-curricular activities is well supported by pupils who make good gains in their fitness and team skills. Recent well-conceived improvements, including the promotion of scientific reasoning and thinking skills, are yet to be fully embedded. Pupils make

p.4

Grade: 3

satisfactory progress in developing the skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being. Pastoral care is good. Pupils successfully learn about keeping safe and develop a good understanding of healthy lifestyles.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise pupils' achievement by improving their application of skills, knowledge and understanding, particularly in scientific enquiry. 2 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007 • Improve the quality of teaching and learning, in particular by ensuring that pupils are fully aware of what they need to do to improve their work. • Embed the school's procedures for assessing and tracking pupils' progress to ensure that all pupils, and especially those with the capacity to reach the higher levels, make the best possible progress as they move through the school.

p.4

Grade: 3

Overall, standards have risen since the last inspection and were above average in 2004 and 2005. In 2006, standards at the end of Year 6 were broadly average. When these pupils were tested and assessed at the end of Year 2, their standards were broadly average; fewer pupils than usual reached the higher levels, particularly in writing and science. Overall, achievement was broadly satisfactory in 2004 and 2005. In 2006, it was broadly satisfactory in English and mathematics and the school's targets were met. However, achievement was lower in science for, although nearly all pupils reached the expected national standard, too few gained the higher level. Analysis of papers indicates that pupils lost valuable marks on questions that required extended answers, particularly those involving more complex comprehension, reasoning and thinking skills. The school has changed the way in which it teaches these skills and that is why

p.5

Grade: 3

standards are now improving. Overall, the differences in standards between boys and girls in 2006 were not significant but many boys did not make consistently good enough progress from when they joined the school. The current position indicates that the school's targets are challenging but achievable. Standards in English are slightly ahead of those in mathematics and science. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and those at the early stages of learning English as an additional language, make satisfactory progress.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They benefit from many opportunities to pause and reflect, as shown in their thoughtful writing about their 'dream world'. Through writing and discussions, pupils have a good and growing understanding of their feelings. Pupils' behaviour is good. Their attendance has improved since the previous inspection and is above average. They respect the views and opinions of others and work well with each other. Pupils make good progress in developing the personal qualities that will enable them to contribute to the community, notably through the School Council, which supports effective links with pupils in different classes, and by caring for one another in the playground as 'buddies' to the younger pupils. Pupils value their involvement in sporting activities and enjoy the healthy snacks and lunches the school provides. 3 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. The proportion of good teaching is improving because teachers' expectations are rising. Relationships between staff and pupils are good, and teaching assistants provide good support for pupils. Pupils say they 'really enjoy' and 'learn a lot' in lessons where they are actively involved in contributing ideas, showing initiative and explaining their reasoning. Teachers manage lessons well but occasionally the pace of learning slows when teachers' explanations and instructions are too complex, and pupils need to ask for clarification. Although the marking of pupils' work is regular and there are some good examples evident, teachers' highlighting of what individual pupils need to do to improve their work is not consistent.

p.6

Grade: 3

Pupils appreciate the way the school brings the curriculum to life, particularly the residential visits that foster team-work and visits to places of interest. The curriculum for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is well matched to their needs, though the school is not consistently responsive to the different needs of boys and girls from year to year. The school's programme for personal, social and health education, and citizenship, is good and successfully promotes pupils' personal development, particularly through the many opportunities for them to contribute to, and take responsibilities in, the community.

p.6

Grade: 3

Overall, the school provides satisfactory care, guidance and support for its pupils. Staff are highly committed to promoting pupils' health and safety. Child protection arrangements are robust and meet current requirements and risk assessments are carefully attended to. However, in this safe and caring environment, learners do not always reach challenging targets. The systems that the school has recently put in place to check on pupils' progress are fit for purpose but their impact is not yet reflected in statutory results. Teachers give pupils targets for what they need to learn next, though some pupils do not have a clear understanding of what they mean. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities receive good support. One parent wrote: 'When I approached the school regarding personal matters impacting on my child's well-being I always found all staff very approachable and supportive.' 4 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.6

Grade: 3

The impact of leadership and management is satisfactory. The headteacher promotes a strong team spirit. Staff and governors work well together and give high priority to pupils' pastoral care. Subject leaders know the strengths and shortcomings in their subject areas but shortcomings in assessment and tracking systems have reduced the impact of the school's efforts in monitoring and evaluating provision and outcomes. Recent developments have provided the missing link in the chain for raising standards and improved the school's capacity to support individual pupils, particularly those with the capability to reach the higher levels. Parents are supportive of the school and speak well of the help they and their children receive from staff. Links with partner schools and other agencies are satisfactory overall. There are good arrangements for easing the transition of pupils to high school. Induction arrangements for pupils transferring into Year 3 are satisfactory. Day-to-day

p.7

Grade: 3

routines are well established. Administrative staff provide good support and the caretaker and his team maintain the premises to a high standard. Resources are of good quality and well-used by staff and pupils. Suitable financial procedures are in place. The governance of the school is satisfactory. Governors are working to develop their role as the school's critical friend. Regular visits by the chair of governors, and the recent involvement of other governors in working on policy reviews in school, are helping to inform their first-hand understanding of the school's work. 5 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

6 February 2007 Dear Pupils Priory Junior School, Priory Road, Gedling, Nottingham NG4 7LE Thank you very much for making us so welcome when we visited your school last week. We enjoyed hearing what you had to say about the school and your work. We are pleased that you enjoy school, work hard and want to do well. We're particularly pleased that you like to be fully involved in lessons so that you can think through and try out your ideas. You are right in saying that the staff take good care of you and that there plenty of opportunities to take part in sporting and other activities. We were delighted to hear how much you enjoy the residential and other visits the school organises. We are pleased to see improvements in the standards of your work and in the progress you make. We liked the way you were finding out about keeping a running total of measurements in Year 3 and how you were using your imagination in your science-fiction writing in Year 5.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Your teachers have improved the way in which they check on how well you are getting on with your work. This means they now have a better idea of what you need to do to improve We think there's still quite a bit of work for teachers to do to get used to these new systems and to ensure that all pupils do their best. We are pleased that your teachers give you targets for improvement but we would like them to make sure that you have a better understanding of exactly what you need to do to reach these. We judge that the teachers are right to give you more opportunities to use and apply the things you already know and can do to solve problems. This is especially important to help you reach the higher standards and we suggest that they find further ways to do this in your lessons. We congratulate you on your good behaviour, politeness and good attendance. You and your teachers get on well. All these are important ingredients in a recipe for improvement. Keep

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

working hard and enjoying school. Yours truly Mike Best Lead Inspector 9 Inspection Report: Priory Junior School, 31 January °1 February 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion