Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Langham Village School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
1 Nov 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Patricia Cox
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NR25 7DG
- Name on report verified
Langham Village School
- URN verified
120825
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006 p.9
- Social and moral development are particularly strong and therefore their behaviour is outstanding and pupils form very good relationships. p.4
- Overall, the school cares for pupils well, and exceptionally well for their physical and p.4
- Pupils achieve very well from Year 2 to Year 6, so that standards are well above average in reading, mathematics and science by the time they leave. p.4
- They grow into responsible, confident and mature individuals, well prepared for the future. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The curriculum is satisfactory overall, although there are weaknesses in the curriculum for Reception children because insufficient time is given to mathematical and personal development. p.4
- Progress has previously been inadequate in writing, but it is now good. p.4
- However, until recently there has been insufficient observation of teaching and consequently teachers have had limited advice about how to improve. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching and the curriculum for Reception and Key Stage 1 to raise standards in mathematical and personal development. p.5
- Raise standards in writing for Years 3 to 6, so that they are closer to those in reading. p.5
- Develop further the formal monitoring of teaching, to support teachers in improving their practice. p.5
- Improve assessment and marking in subjects other than English, mathematics and science. p.5
- Pupils make good overall progress overall. p.5
- The test results at the end of Year 6 have been well above average in reading, mathematics and science for many years, and often exceptionally high, particularly in mathematics. p.5
- Progress in writing is improving and is now good because the school has identified and is tackling specific weaknesses. p.5
- Challenging targets are set for attainment and usually exceeded. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,609
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Langham Village School
p.1
120825 Unique Reference Number NORFOLK Local Authority 291870 Inspection number 31 October °1 November 2006 Inspection dates Patricia Cox Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
North Street School address Primary Type of school Langham, Langham Community School category Holt, Norfolk NR25 7DG 4 °11 Age range of pupils 01328 830377 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01328 830377 Fax number 83 Number on roll (school) Mr Jeremy Bagnall-Oakeley Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Michael Green Headteacher 18 June 2001 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 291870 31 October °1 November 2006 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
This small school is situated in a relatively remote part of Norfolk. All pupils are of White British heritage and speak English as their first language. The proportions entitled to free school meals, or identified with learning difficulties and disabilities, are below the national average. While pupils have a range of family backgrounds, the majority are relatively advantaged and attainment of children on entry to the school is above national expectations. The school has had staffing difficulties in recent years, particularly in providing cover for the headteacher to carry out his management responsibilities. The situation is now stable and the school has a full complement of permanent staff. The school recently achieved the Healthy Schools Award.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school, which is held in high esteem by parents, who are closely involved in its work, and is valued by its community. The school provides good value for money and is well poised for further improvement. Pupils thoroughly enjoy their time here and their attendance is good. Their personal development is good. The school provides well for their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Social and moral development are particularly strong and therefore their behaviour is outstanding and pupils form very good relationships. They grow into responsible, confident and mature individuals, well prepared for the future. Pupils make satisfactory progress overall in Reception, but progress is weaker in personal and mathematical development, and this is also the case in Year 1. Progress accelerates from Year 2 onwards as a result of good teaching. Although standards in mathematics have not recovered by the end of
p.4
Grade: 2
Year 2, and are only average, they are above average in reading, writing and science. Pupils achieve very well from Year 2 to Year 6, so that standards are well above average in reading, mathematics and science by the time they leave. However, standards in writing are average. Progress has previously been inadequate in writing, but it is now good. Teaching in Years 2 to 6 is lively and imaginative, catering well for the range of age and ability in the class. Those pupils with learning difficulties have the support they need to achieve as well as other pupils. The curriculum is satisfactory overall, although there are weaknesses in the curriculum for Reception children because insufficient time is given to mathematical and personal development. In the rest of the school it is good and matched carefully to the skills pupils need to develop in each year. Overall, the school cares for pupils well, and exceptionally well for their physical and
p.4
Grade: 2
emotional safety. Academic support and guidance are satisfactory. While there are good systems to assess pupils' progress in English, mathematics and science, and to guide them through the marking of their work, these are not as effective in other subjects. There is a strong focus on health, safety and decision making, especially in encouraging pupils to take responsibility for their own choices. The pupils make a good contribution to the school, particularly through the work of the school and class councils. They take responsibility for gathering the views of others and judging which issues to pursue, and their opinions are valued. Leadership and management are good. The headteacher and assistant headteacher work closely together and provide a clear direction for the school, focused on maintaining and improving standards. Their self-assessment is accurate and, because of good monitoring, they have an accurate understanding of where improvement is
p.4
Grade: 2
needed. However, until recently there has been insufficient observation of teaching and consequently teachers have had limited advice about how to improve. Nevertheless, action to bring about improvement is effective and the staff carry out their management responsibilities satisfactorily. Governors are closely involved in the school and fulfil their role satisfactorily. 2 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Improve teaching and the curriculum for Reception and Key Stage 1 to raise standards in mathematical and personal development. • Raise standards in writing for Years 3 to 6, so that they are closer to those in reading. • Develop further the formal monitoring of teaching, to support teachers in improving their practice. • Improve assessment and marking in subjects other than English, mathematics and science.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils make good overall progress overall. The test results at the end of Year 6 have been well above average in reading, mathematics and science for many years, and often exceptionally high, particularly in mathematics. Progress in writing is improving and is now good because the school has identified and is tackling specific weaknesses. Challenging targets are set for attainment and usually exceeded. The results of the national teachers' assessments in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 2 in 2005 and 2006 were above the national average in reading, writing and science. Although progress is satisfactory in Reception and Year 1 overall, children do not always make as much progress as they could in mathematical and personal development.
p.5
Grade: 2
Personal development and well-being are good. There have been no recent exclusions and pupils say that there is no bullying at all. If it occurred, they are confident that it would be dealt with rapidly. The school has very effective methods for dealing with pupils' concerns confidentially, and they report that there is always an adult they can turn to if they are upset. Pupils have many opportunities to take responsibility and they develop a good understanding of the world of work through running the 'healthy tuck shop'. This is one of the many effective aspects of the school's strong emphasis on healthy eating, and pupils are very involved in moves to change the school meals supplier to ensure more nutritious food. Their good involvement in, and contribution to, the community results mainly from strong links with the local church, which also adds to their good spiritual development. Cultural development is satisfactory. The
p.5
Grade: 2
pupils have many opportunities to experience a range of cultures through for example music, art and literature, but their understanding of the cultural diversity of society is not developed sufficiently. There are well-advanced plans to remedy this situation through the adoption of a new curriculum. 3 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.5
Grade: 2
Relationships are very good throughout the school and therefore lessons proceed smoothly. Teachers are enthusiastic and use interesting resources, including some exciting information and communication technology (ICT) programs, which involve and stimulate pupils, who respond well and are eager to answer. In most classes, teachers have a good understanding of their pupils' attainment and build carefully on their skills and knowledge. Explanations are very clear because teachers have good subject knowledge and this contributes much to pupils' good progress. Pupils are encouraged and supported to do their best. Work is usually planned well for the different levels of age and ability, but it is not always sufficiently clear what pupils are intended to learn in Reception and Key Stage 1. Teaching assistants make a good contribution to the work of the pupils they support and are usually involved in the lesson planning.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school is well advanced in adopting a very well-planned curriculum that has good potential to expand pupils' horizons. The personal, social and health education curriculum is satisfactory and improving. There is a rich variety of visits and visitors to enliven the programmes, including many which enhance pupils' understanding of the wider world. There is an exceptional range of activities outside the school day, including French. However, the curriculum for the Reception children allows insufficient time for mathematics and personal development. The children who attend in the morning do not always have the same experience as those who attend in the afternoon. Nevertheless, the newly developed outside area is a good resource and its use is improving.
p.6
Grade: 2
Pupils feel safe and secure because they are looked after very well. All necessary checks have been made on adults who work in the school, and risk assessments are carried out. Child protection procedures are stringent. Accidents and incidents are rare and are dealt with appropriately. Pupils who have learning difficulties are identified early and given good support. Tracking systems are used well to check progress in English, mathematics and science. Pupils are satisfactorily involved in measuring their own progress through their targets in these subjects, but the recording method does not show how rapid their progress has been. 4 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.6
Grade: 2
The headteacher and assistant headteacher have a good grasp of standards and a good knowledge of how to bring about improvement. They and the staff work very well as a team and teachers, who have many responsibilities, carry these out satisfactorily. There is a very close partnership with parents. Senior managers know the school well, through their own teaching roles and a range of monitoring methods. There is close scrutiny of pupils' work and test results, so that areas for improvement are identified. Lesson observations lapsed during staffing shortages, but those that have been carried out recently are focused and evaluative and professional development has been based on the outcomes. Action taken on shortcomings has been well targeted and effective. Planning for improvement is good, although it is not clear enough about how the school will know whether it has been successful. Governors carry out their role
p.7
Grade: 2
satisfactorily. Their work has been made more efficient and is developing in innovative and interesting ways, so that their committees are focusing on the success of the school in developing each aspect of the whole child. 5 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006 .
p.7
Grade: 2
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
2 November 2006 Dear Pupils Langham Village School, North Street, Langham, Holt, Norfolk. NR25 7DG It was good to meet you when I visited your school recently. I really enjoyed meeting you all and the discussions we had. I thought you might like to know what I found out about your school. I think you're lucky to go to such a good school, and I agree with you when you said that your teachers are nice. You do really well in most subjects because the teaching is good. But I think there are some things that could be better, and you could help in some ways. The younger children don't do as well as they could in mathematics, so maybe they could help by trying to learn faster. The same thing goes for the older children with their writing, so they could make a bigger effort with their spelling, punctuation and handwriting. The children in Reception and Year 1 should do more mathematics and I've asked your teachers to make sure
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
that the Reception children who come in the morning do the same things as the ones who come in the afternoon. The youngest children need to be taught how to work on their own and not rely so much on adults. I was really impressed by the way you behave and your good manners. The older ones are very sensible and do their jobs very well. You all seem to enjoy yourselves and I like the way so many of you were keen to answer questions in class. Your teachers help by asking special questions for each year group, so none of you get left out. You're lucky to have such a lot of interesting activities at lunch time and after school. Your targets are helpful, and your teachers know how well you are doing in English, mathematics and science, and mark your work well so they can help you if you have problems. I've asked them to do this in other subjects too. Your school is good because your headteacher and teachers run it well. They know what needs
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
doing to make it better, and they get on and do it, however they need a little more advice about how to make their teaching even better, so I've asked Mr Green to help them to do that. Thank you very much for looking after me so brilliantly and I'm sure that you'll all carry on doing well. Mrs Pat Cox Inspector 9 Inspection Report: Langham Village School, 31 October °1 November 2006
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion