Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Buxton Primary School

Inspected 28 Jun 2007 · published 10 Sept 2007 · URN 120794

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

John Francis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Jun 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Francis

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    NR10 5EZ

  • Name on report verified

    Buxton Primary School

  • URN verified

    120794

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallyenjoyconsistentlystrengthsoutstandingaccuratelymake good progress
Criticisminadequateweaknessesfailedlacksnot consistentlynot alwaysconcernsweakness

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1652w−0
  • What needs to improve1161w−47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,786
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 44
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

120794 Unique Reference Number NORFOLK LA Local Authority 291860 Inspection number 28 June 2007 Inspection date John Francis Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 103 School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Garry Goodman Chair Mrs Jayne Dingley Headteacher 25 February 2002 Date of previous school inspection Aylsham Road School address Buxton Norwich Norfolk NR10 5EZ

p.1

01603 279357 Telephone number 01603 279296 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 28 June 2007 Inspection date 291860 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a smaller than average primary school to the north of Norwich serving the village and surrounding rural area. Numbers have fallen significantly over the last five years, particularly with the closure of the nearby airbase at Coltishall in 2006. Almost all of the pupils are of White British heritage. Very few pupils come from minority ethnic families and none are at the early stages of learning English. The percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals is below average. Attainment on entry to the school is broadly average and the proportion of pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities is broadly average. Since the last inspection there have been a number of changes to the leadership of the school. The school is recognised by Investors in People.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. The leadership and management of the school are inadequate. While the headteacher has a clear vision for the school and has accurately identified the most important areas for improvement, some aspects of the overall evaluation are too generous. There has not been sufficient structure or rigour to monitoring, particularly of teaching and learning. As a consequence, any areas for improvement identified have not been followed up and quality of learning has not improved quickly enough. Weakness in governance means that the leadership

p.4

Grade: 4

of the school, at all levels, has not been held to account for the inadequate progress pupils make. Good provision and skilful teaching enable children to get a good start in Reception, to reach standards above those normally seen for this age. However, following several years of high standards by the end of Year 2, results over the last two years have declined steadily and are now only average. At the end of Year 6, test and assessment results are average and have been for many years, indicating that these pupils are not reaching the standards that their capabilities at Year 2 suggest they should. From an above average starting point in Year 1, pupils in both key stages make inadequate progress over time. This is the result of teaching being inadequate overall. While there are examples of good teaching for most pupils, much of it lacks inspiration, pace and challenge. Pupils with learning difficulties are a notable exception to this trend.

p.4

Grade: 4

Enjoying good provision and support, they achieve well and reach standards well above average compared to their peers nationally. Pupils' personal development is satisfactory, supported by the satisfactory provision for care, guidance and support. The school has developed a more consistent approach to assessment and recording. This is now providing better information, allowing pupils' progress to be tracked more accurately. However, this information is not being used well enough to identify trends in progress over time. Neither do pupils have sufficient understanding of what their own targets mean and what they need to do to improve. Most pupils behave sensibly and show respect for others. However, there is a small minority who find it difficult to conform to the standards expected. Pupils contribute to the school and wider community, for example, through the school council, which they take very seriously and value the responsibility they are given and

p.4

Grade: 4

through the environmental (ECO) group. Most pupils enjoy school. They like the way the curriculum is now taught through topics and feel it is more interesting and that they learn more, especially when it is linked to real-life problems and challenges. The good business enterprise curriculum helps to prepare pupils' for their future economic well-being. Pupils have a secure understanding of the benefits of exercise and healthy lifestyles but do not always support this in their everyday habits. Given the low levels of achievement and lack of progress since the last inspection, the school does not give satisfactory value for money. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the strategic leadership and management at all levels so that the responsibilities and accountability of all involved are clearly defined and there are systems to evaluate the impact of these. ■ Use the available data more effectively to identify what is needed to improve the rate of pupils' progress and raise standards in English, mathematics and science. ■ Bring greater rigour into monitoring of teaching and learning to address identified weaknesses.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Give pupils a greater understanding of their targets and involve them consistently in recording and checking their own progress.

p.5

Grade: 4

In 2006, the majority of pupils at both Year 2 and Year 6 failed to achieve to their potential and made inadequate progress. The school failed to meet its targets in English and mathematics, and significantly so for the higher Level 5. Current standards reflect a similar pattern, except for pupils with learning difficulties who make good progress, attaining levels well above those seen nationally for this group. This is the result of good provision and support by teaching assistants.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Most pupils behave well and work hard, but there are some, mainly boys, whose behaviour and attitudes fall short of this standard. This is a matter that concerns a number of pupils and parents. Pupils understand what they need to do to stay safe and keep healthy, but do not consistently apply this knowledge in practice, for example, by bringing snacks to school that have a high fat or salt content. They are keen to participate in the wide range of physical activities on offer. Attendance is good. Pupils find many more lessons 'fun' because with the new curriculum they are more interesting and relevant than they used to be, and they 'learn more'. They are keen to take responsibility for their own community through the school council and ECO group, and do so to good effect. Overall, by the time they leave the school, most pupils are thoughtful and well motivated young

p.5

Grade: 3

people who, given their academic capabilities, could be better prepared for the next stage in their education.

p.5

Grade: 4

Teaching is not stretching all pupils sufficiently. While challenging targets are set for pupils to achieve, they do not consistently reach these and the assessment of their progress towards them lacks the rigour needed to spur pupils on to higher achievement. Marking, likewise is too variable. While regular and supportive, it is not leading to improvement. Teachers clearly identify in their planning what they want their pupils to learn and are making good use of the technology available, such as the interactive white boards. Where good teaching is seen, lessons are lively and learning is well planned to meet the individual needs of the pupils. As a result they are responsive, keen to learn and work at a good pace. However, the pace, drive and tasks which 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007 would fire the pupils' imagination is often lacking. In some instances the quality of learning

p.5

Grade: 4

slips further because pupils either spend too long listening to the teacher, the work is undemanding or too much time is allowed for the tasks set. This results in slow progress. Having identified many of these elements, the school's leadership has not brought sufficient rigour to following up any recommendations made for improvement.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is not consistently matched to the full range of learners' capabilities and needs. The Reception children enjoy an imaginative and stimulating curriculum that excites their attention and interest, enabling them to achieve well. Similarly, pupils with additional learning needs are well catered for. The school's move towards a more creative curriculum placing greater emphasis on pupils as active learners is only partially successful. Where it works well, pupils are increasingly enabled to develop and apply their knowledge and skills in a wider variety of cross-curricular contexts, for example in Year 6 in mathematics. Where it is less successful, teachers make too little time available for pupils, especially the more able, to develop their understanding through practical tasks. Pupils are not sufficiently engaged in their own learning, especially in Key Stage 1. The wide range of after-school activities is much enjoyed and valued

p.6

Grade: 3

by pupils, as are the topic weeks and the business enterprise work provided for them. In contrast, pupils and parents alike are disappointed by the reduction in educational visits in recent times. The provision to promote pupils' personal, social and health education is satisfactory overall.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school meets all the necessary requirements for the care and safeguarding of pupils. The pastoral care provided is satisfactory and has some strengths. The school works well with other agencies to provide additional guidance and support. Staff know the children well and are genuinely committed to them. Pupils value this, but at the same time do not always feel that their concerns are adequately listened to by all staff. The academic guidance for pupils is inconsistent. Tracking records, while detailed, are not used sufficiently robustly to support detailed and precise targets for all pupils. Those for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, and for Reception children, provide an exception to this. Relations with parents are mixed and while a number of parents recognise that improvements are being made, a small minority are less convinced of this. The changes taking place and the headteachers vision for

p.6

Grade: 3

the future are not being communicated as effectively as they might.

p.6

Grade: 4

Since the last inspection standards have fallen without sufficient remedial action being taken. The school's leadership has failed to establish the reasons for the inadequate achievement in Key Stage 2, or the fall in standards at Year 2 and put in place measures to address this. The headteacher has accurately identified the most important issues for improvement. However, the monitoring of many aspects of the school's work by managers at all levels is not regular enough and neither has it the necessary rigour that would improve the overall quality and increase the pace of change. There is not a sufficiently strong focus on identifying the strengths and weaknesses in learning or teaching so the best practice in the school can be shared and 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007 built on and weaknesses addressed. Governance is inadequate. Governors are committed but ineffective in addressing the decline. The governing body does not receive all the information

p.6

Grade: 4

it needs to effectively evaluate the work of the school. However, neither does it have its own systems for gathering information about the schools' performance. The governing body lacks secure strategies for evaluating either the school's work or its own effectiveness. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 4

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 4 The capacity to make any necessary improvements No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

4 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? Yes Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

29 June 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Buxton Primary School, Buxton, Norwich, NR10 5EZ You may remember that Mr Williams and I visited your school recently. We would like to thank you for making us welcome. We were pleased that those of you we talked with wanted to share their work and ideas. This letter is to tell you what we found out about your school and how it can be better. Your teachers and other adults in school know you well and want to do their best for you. We liked the way your teachers used the interactive white boards to make your lessons more interesting. Most of you behave well but there are a few children who do not and spoil things for others. Those children really need to think about how their actions affect others in the school. We think the school council and the ECO group do a good job. You told us you enjoy school, particularly with the new creative curriculum, which is making many of your lessons more

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

interesting. We thought that the range of extra activities you can take part in is good and your business enterprise work is really impressive. We also recognise that you are disappointed that there is little opportunity to go on visits to widen your knowledge of some of the things you are studying. While most of you do as well as pupils in other schools, we feel many of you can do much better. To help with this we would like the school to do a number of things. We have asked those who lead and manage the school to improve how they measure the school's progress and how well your teachers are helping you to learn. We have also asked them to make better use all of the information they have from your tests so they know what it is you need to do to improve and to share this with you more regularly. Inspectors will call regularly to help the school focus on these issues. You can play your part in making your school better by behaving well, working

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

your hardest all the time and showing what you are really capable of. It was a pleasure to meet you. John Francis Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Buxton Primary School, 28 June 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion