Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Denton CofE School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Feb 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Geof Timms
- Achievement verified
Inadequate
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
NG32 1LG
- Name on report verified
Denton CE School
- URN verified
120518
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- AchievementInadequate
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The recent introduction of a small group of Year 6 pupils receiving extra support in preparation for their English and mathematics tests is proving very effective, and they are being very well taught. p.4
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007 p.9
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school's self evaluation of its work is poor and does not highlight accurately the current weaknesses, and thus does not help staff to prioritise needs and raise standards. p.4
- In Years 5 and 6 teaching is weak overall because of the ineffective p.4
- They are aware of how to stay safe but the inadequate aspects to their education means they are not being sufficiently well prepared for the future. p.4
- The overall effectiveness of the school is currently inadequate because the progress made by pupils is unsatisfactory. p.4
- Year 3 and 4 pupils make satisfactory progress in English and science, but in mathematics it is inadequate. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards and the achievement of pupils by the end of Year 6. p.5
- Strengthen the leadership of the school by improving the strategic planning and the school's self evaluation. p.5
- Improving the role of the governing body in evaluating, challenging and planning the work of the school. p.5
- Improve the quality of teaching and learning by ensuring all work is sufficiently challenging and provides enough opportunities for independent learning. p.5
- Although standards in English, mathematics and science are broadly average by the end of Year 6, achievement is inadequate overall because pupils make insufficient progress, especially in Years 5 and 6. p.5
- In their Reception year children make good progress and most develop good learning habits and attain standards at least in line with and often better than those expected. p.5
- The good progress continues through Years 1 and 2 and the standards reached at the end of Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics are consistently above average. p.5
- However, there is a different picture by the end of Year 6. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment19
“due to inconsistent and often inadequate teaching and management in that class.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,645
- about usual (typical 3071)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
120518 Unique Reference Number LINCOLNSHIRE Local Authority 291766 Inspection number 13 °14 February 2007 Inspection dates Geof Timms Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Church Street School address Primary Type of school Denton, Grantham Voluntary controlled School category Lincolnshire NG32 1LG 4 °11 Age range of pupils 01476 870649 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01476 870649 Fax number 69 Number on roll (school) Mr M Bennett Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs J Hadley Headteacher 12 November 2002 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 291766 13 °14 February 2007 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
The school is much smaller than most primary schools. Pupils come from Denton and local villages or the town of Grantham. Very few pupils are entitled to free school meals and none is from minority ethnic families or has English as an additional language. An above average proportion of the pupils have learning difficulties or disabilities. The attainment of most children when they start school is above that typically found. The school has Investors in People status and a Basic Skills Quality Award.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.3
Grade: 4
In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standards of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. The overall effectiveness of the school is currently inadequate because the progress made by pupils is unsatisfactory. This is due to a variety of factors but is largely because leadership and management are inadequate, and do not provide the school with a clear educational direction. The school's self evaluation of its work is poor and does not highlight accurately the current weaknesses, and thus does not help staff to prioritise needs and raise standards. The governing body has not held the school sufficiently to account for the standards achieved. Improvement since the last
p.4
Grade: 4
inspection has been unsatisfactory and standards have fallen. As a result, the school does not provide value for money. Most children start school with standards that are above those expected given their ages. They make good progress in the Foundation Stage and in Years 1 and 2. This leads to consistently above average standards by the end of Year 2. In Years 3 to 6 progress is inconsistent. Year 3 and 4 pupils make satisfactory progress in English and science, but in mathematics it is inadequate. In Years 5 and 6 progress in all subjects is inadequate and by the time they leave the school standards have fallen to a level that is currently broadly average. This represents inadequate achievement given the same pupils' attainment at the end of Year 2. Part of the reason for the fall in standards from Year 2 is the unsatisfactory teaching of mathematics. In Years 5 and 6 teaching is weak overall because of the ineffective
p.4
Grade: 4
management of the staffing of the class and an over-reliance on support staff. There are too few opportunities for pupils to develop independent learning skills and insufficient work that is hard enough to really challenge them and develop their knowledge and understanding. The quality of teaching in the Foundation Stage and in Years 1 and 2 is good and has a positive impact on pupils' progress. Some of the teaching in Years 3 and 4 is also of good quality, especially in English. The recent introduction of a small group of Year 6 pupils receiving extra support in preparation for their English and mathematics tests is proving very effective, and they are being very well taught. Pupils' personal development, the curriculum and the care, guidance and support offered to pupils are all satisfactory. Most pupils clearly enjoy school. They have a good awareness of how to lead healthy lifestyles and staff strive to provide good
p.4
Grade: 4
opportunities for physical education given the limited accommodation. Pupils make a good contribution to the local and wider community. They are aware of how to stay safe but the inadequate aspects to their education means they are not being sufficiently well prepared for the future. The school makes satisfactory efforts to extend the pupils' 2 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007 skills and awareness through support for those with learning difficulties and specialist teaching in science and sport.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards and the achievement of pupils by the end of Year 6. • Strengthen the leadership of the school by improving the strategic planning and the school's self evaluation. • Improving the role of the governing body in evaluating, challenging and planning the work of the school. • Improve the quality of teaching and learning by ensuring all work is sufficiently challenging and provides enough opportunities for independent learning.
p.5
Grade: 4
Although standards in English, mathematics and science are broadly average by the end of Year 6, achievement is inadequate overall because pupils make insufficient progress, especially in Years 5 and 6. In their Reception year children make good progress and most develop good learning habits and attain standards at least in line with and often better than those expected. The good progress continues through Years 1 and 2 and the standards reached at the end of Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics are consistently above average. However, there is a different picture by the end of Year 6. The progress made in Years 3 to 6 is inconsistent, with some important weaknesses, particularly in mathematics. In Years 5 and 6 there is significant underachievement in all subjects and the standards attained by the end of Year 6 have fallen over the last three years, and are currently no better than average. This is largely
p.5
Grade: 4
due to inconsistent and often inadequate teaching and management in that class.
p.5
Grade: 3
Most pupils enjoy school and this is supported by the majority of the parents. Pupils' attendance is broadly average. The pupils are largely willing to learn and keen to take part in the more interesting activities provided for them. However, many of the older pupils do not take a very active part in lessons. There is a school council which has had a minor impact on issues regarding the playground but this is not effectively used to provide pupils with a voice. Behaviour is satisfactory, although some parents and pupils feel there are times when it is not so good and bullying can occur. Pupils are mostly happy that this is dealt with satisfactorily by adults. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. 3 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.5
Grade: 4
Although the teaching and learning are inadequate overall, there is good practice to be found in the school. The best teaching is evident in Reception and Years 1 and 2, and in the 'booster' groups set up recently to raise standards in Year 6. Where the teaching is most effective staff have very good relationships with their pupils. Work is well planned and activities are appropriate for the aims of the lesson. However, where the teaching and learning is less effective teaching assistants are not sufficiently involved when teachers are talking to the whole class, while on other occasions they are given too much planning and teaching responsibility. Activities are not sufficiently challenging or matched to the pupils' prior attainment. The marking of pupils' work in Years 3 to 6 does not help them understand what they have done well or how they can improve. Pupils have insufficient opportunities to develop effective independent
p.6
Grade: 4
learning skills. Some teachers' subject knowledge and understanding is inadequate. This is particularly true in mathematics. The teachers are making better use of information and communication technology (ICT) than was the case during the last inspection; pupils' skills are satisfactory and improving.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school has planned the curriculum so that the statutory requirements are met over a two year cycle for mixed age classes. It is extended through the teaching of a modern foreign language in some lessons. The curriculum in Reception and Years 1 and 2 is good and well planned. The use of the much improved outdoor area for Reception is good. The school does not yet make many links between subjects that would help pupils see how their learning in one subject can be of use elsewhere. The staff have made some effective use of outside expertise to widen pupils' learning about science and life in Nepal for example. Teachers work hard to provide good sporting, musical and other opportunities through after school clubs and enrichment activities.
p.6
Grade: 3
This is a caring school and, although it has weaknesses in aspects of its work, all staff work very hard to care for and support the pupils. When health issues arise they are dealt with well and procedures are robust. The support offered to those with learning difficulties or disabilities has improved under the current coordinator and is now good. The school works hard to ensure the safety of the pupils and the requirements for checking the backgrounds of adults helping or working in school are met. However, the procedures and management of child protection are too much invested in one person and more training among all staff is needed so that they are confident in 4 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007 recognising signs of concern. The setting of targets to help pupils improve is new and yet to have much impact, although pupils are more aware of what they need to do to improve. There are good relationships with outside agencies and these provide effective
p.6
Grade: 4
This aspect is inadequate because the school has had insufficiently clear and strong leadership recently to enable it to evaluate accurately the success of its work, and to plan for future improvement. There is currently a long term instability at senior leadership level that leads to an inadequate capacity to improve. There is no overall agreed strategic vision for the school that is shared with everyone. Subject leadership has been a recent focus for improvement and the staff involved have worked hard to develop their skills, although as yet this has had little impact on provision. For example, a recent analysis of test questions is yet to be used sufficiently in the planning of activities. The governing body has not been involved enough in evaluating the quality of what the school provides, and have not had enough input to the school's self evaluation and development planning. The school is at a very early stage in tracking
p.7
Grade: 4
pupils' progress and using this data to set targets, raise standards and improve provision. The management of teachers and teaching assistants has not been effective and this has a negative impact on classes which have more than one teacher. Too many demands have been made on the skills of some hard working teaching assistants, particularly in Years 5 and 6. 5 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007 .
p.7
Grade: 4
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 4 The capacity to make any necessary improvements No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
4 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? Yes Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
15 February 2007 Dear Children Denton CE VC Primary School, Church Street, Denton, Lincolnshire I want to thank you very much for the welcome you gave me when I visited and the help you gave me in finding out about your school. You told me how much you enjoy school and I hope you all have a good time on the exciting visit to see 'Cats'! There are a number of satisfactory things about the school. All of the adults care for and look after you well. They work very hard to provide you with some interesting out of school activities and lots of visits. In Reception you have a good time and learn a lot about working and playing together. This prepares you well for Years 1 and 2 and you carry on learning well and are good at reading, writing and mathematics. The school council told me that you behave well most of the time, and that they feel safe in school. Unfortunately the school is not as good as it should be in meeting your needs and helping you
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
reach high enough standards by the end of Year 6. Because of this there are a lot of important improvements that I have asked the governors and staff to make. These will help the school provide a better education for you in the future and will help your learning improve. The school needs to help you learn more and make better progress by the time you leave Year 6. To do this the school needs to be much better led and organised. The teaching needs to improve and the governors need to be better at checking how well the school is doing. Inspectors will be visiting your school regularly to check the progress being made. Many thanks again for your help during the inspection. Keep working hard and you will help the school get much better. Yours sincerely Geof Timms Lead inspector 9 Inspection Report: Denton CE School, 13 °14 February 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion