Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Cockerham Parochial CofE Primary School

Inspected 22 Mar 2007 · published 2 May 2007 · URN 119525

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Mar 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Geoffrey Yates

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LA2 0EF

  • Name on report verified

    Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    119525

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelyexceptionallystrongenjoyhigh qualityeffectivestrength
Criticismlacknot alwaysinadequatebelowmisseddisruptionconcernlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1475w+68
  • What needs to improve1097w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,541
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

119525 Unique Reference Number Lancashire Local Authority 291448 Inspection number 22 March 2007 Inspection date Geoffrey Yates Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 72 School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Geoff Bottomley Chair Mr Frank Green Headteacher 1 March 2001 Date of previous school inspection Main Street School address Cockerham Lancaster Lancashire LA2 0EF

p.1

01524 791550 Telephone number 01524 791550 Fax number

p.1

4 °11 Age group 22 March 2007 Inspection date 291448 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a much smaller than average primary school serving a rural area on the outskirts of Lancaster. The percentage of pupils entitled to a free school meal is below the national average, as is the number identified as having learning difficulties and/or disabilities. All pupils are taught in mixed age classes and attainment on entry is broadly average. At the time of the inspection, a major building project was well underway.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school that is friendly and caring and provides pupils with a good standard of education. Most parents are very supportive of the school and one parental comment captures the views of many, ‘My overall opinion is that my children could not receive a better standard of education.’ Pupils achieve well with clear evidence of outstanding progress in Years 3 to 6. Most children start school with levels of attainment typical for their age but with the small number of pupils in each age group there is some fluctuation in overall entry levels. They make satisfactory progress in Reception and reach the expected levels across all areas of learning by the time they enter Year 1. This satisfactory progress is maintained in Key Stage 1. As a result, pupils leave Year 2 with standards that are average in reading, writing and mathematics. However, in mathematics and writing some potentially high attainers do not achieve well enough. Pupils’

p.4

Grade: 2

progress accelerates in Years 3 to 6 so that by the end of Year 6, standards are above average in English, mathematics and science, at the expected levels and at the higher levels. The small number of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities achieve well. A particular strength of the school is pupils’ good information and communication technology (ICT) skills. Pastoral support is strong, with all staff firmly committed to pupils' care and well-being. Pupils respond well and, as a result, their personal development is good. Pupils are well behaved, considerate to others and enjoy coming to school. As one pupil said, 'what I like about this school is that everyone cares for each other.’ Pupils are confident in talking about their achievements and willing to listen to the ideas and opinions of others. However, their knowledge of cultures other than their own is limited. Pupils are very aware of the importance of regular

p.4

Grade: 2

exercise and of eating healthily. They care for the environment and this is reflected in a letter sent recently by one pupil to the local authority requesting better facilities for recycling of materials. Attendance levels are above average. Teaching and learning are good, with good relationships leading to a friendly working atmosphere in classrooms, despite the disruption caused by the on-going building work with one class having to work in the school hall. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together. Teaching is particularly strong in Years 5 and 6. The good curriculum is enriched by out of school clubs and visits to places of interest. However, opportunities are missed for pupils to use their good writing skills in subjects across the curriculum. The lack of a designated outdoor area for children in the Reception class places restrictions on the range of opportunities the school can offer to its youngest pupils. The school has developed good systems to check on

p.4

Grade: 2

individual pupils' progress and older pupils in particular are very aware of what they need to do to improve on previous learning. Leadership and management are good, with the school having an accurate self-evaluation. The school has a good capacity to make any necessary further improvements and provides good value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Ensure potentially high attaining pupils in Key Stage 1 achieve as well as they can in mathematics and writing. • Provide more challenging opportunities for pupils to use their good writing skills in subjects across the curriculum. 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007 • Take all possible steps to ensure that children in the Reception age group have a well organised and equipped outdoor area.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils achieve well by the time they leave, with rapid progress in Years 3 to 6 resulting in above average standards. Pupils of all attainment levels achieve very well in Key Stage 2. The school’s test results show that pupils’ achievement at Key Stage 2 has been outstandingly high for the previous three years and, in 2006, was in the top percentile. The school has compelling evidence to show that pupils are continuing to make very good progress in Key Stage 2, with results this year again expected to be high in English, mathematics and science. Pupils’ progress in the Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 is satisfactory and not as rapid as in Key Stage 2. Assessments at the end of Reception, from an average starting point, show standards to be broadly average. Test results at the end of Key Stage 1 have been broadly average for the previous few years, but there is a pattern of below average numbers of pupils reaching the higher level of attainment

p.5

Grade: 2

All pupils respond well to the school’s good provision for their personal development. They behave well and are eager to take on responsibilities, such as being a member of the school council, which gives all of them a voice in how the school develops. Pupils enjoy school; this is reflected in above average attendance. They have a good understanding of the importance of eating healthily and of the need to take regular exercise. Pupils also know how to stay safe; for example, by acting responsibly when playing in the playground and moving around the school. They are suitably prepared for the next stage of their education and future life because they not only have good basic skills but also good skills in the use of ICT. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is good overall. However, pupils do not have a good awareness of cultures different from their own. Pupils are courteous and respectful to others

p.5

Grade: 2

and clearly know the difference between right and wrong. From the Reception year onwards, they share resources fairly and collaborate well. They are aware of the need to think of others less well off than themselves and organise their own fundraising events for charitable causes.

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of the teaching and learning is underpinned by high quality relationships between pupils and all members of staff. As a result, all pupils are keen to learn. Teaching typically includes well managed classrooms and good use of questioning. The quality of teaching and learning is very strong in Years 5 and 6. For example, in this class pupils thrive on being asked to solve mentally challenging numerical problems and they are proud to talk about their well planned project work on marketing a product. However, teachers in the mixed age group class for the younger pupils do not always plan challenging work within the age groups that is matched to pupils’ needs. As a result, potential higher attaining pupils do not make sufficient progress in mathematics and writing. Good use is made of teaching assistants to support learning, especially for those pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.

p.5

Grade: 2

5 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is designed successfully to provide an appropriate balance between academic and creative activities. Outstanding opportunities are provided for pupils to use their ICT skills. The school provides a good programme for promoting pupils' personal development. A good emphasis is placed on the provision for the teaching of basic skills. However, opportunities are missed for pupils to use their good writing skills well in subjects across the curriculum. Curriculum planning has been refined in the class containing Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 pupils to ensure that pupils receive a balanced curriculum. However, the lack of an outside area places restrictions on the range of activities younger pupils experience. The curriculum is extended effectively through a broad range of extra-curricular activities, educational visits and links with others, such as the use of the swimming baths at the university.

p.6

Grade: 2

Good procedures are in place to protect and safeguard the pupils, and staff show a high level of concern for their welfare. As a result, pupils say they feel safe and they are confident that staff will listen to them if they have a problem. Good support in class for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities results in similar progress to their peers. Parents are very appreciative of the way their children are cared for while in school. Effective risk assessments are firmly in place in and around the school, and for off site visits. This important aspect of school life was very evident during the inspection with regard to the school’s response to the building work taking place. The school has good procedures for checking pupils’ academic progress but the information is not always used well enough in planning challenging work for younger pupils.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school is well led and managed. The headteacher works hard and successfully to ensure that pupils receive a good standard of education. As such, pupils are supported well and standards by the time pupils leave are above average. A major strength of the school is the way in which all pupils feel valued and are included in everything the school offers. In this small school, teachers are all involved effectively in its leadership and management. Governance is of a good quality with the chairman having a good knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas for development. Parents and pupils are consulted on a regular basis. The whole process of school self-evaluation has resulted in an overview of the work of the school which was confirmed as accurate by the inspection. Improvement since the previous inspection has been good overall. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.6

Grade: 2

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School Main Street Cockerham Lancaster Lancashire LA2 0EF 25 March 2007 Dear Children As you are aware I recently visited your school. I am writing to thank you for the super welcome you gave me and to let you know what I found. You will be pleased to know that I think you go to a good school. I think it is good because all the grown ups teach you and look after you well. As a result, you make good progress in your work although I would like to see you use your good writing skills more in history and geography topics. You behave well, try hard, know how to make healthy and safe choices and look after each other. It is good to hear that you feel you have someone who will listen to you if you become upset. So how are you and all the staff going to make your school even better? Well, despite the building work going on at the moment the children who are in their first year in school do not

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

have an outside area where they can extend their learning. I also think that in Years 1 and 2 some of the work that pupils are asked to do in mathematics and writing could be a bit more challenging. I know you are proud to belong to Cockerham School and I know all of you will work together to make it even better. My very best wishes to you all; I hope those of you going on the residential visit really enjoy it. Yours sincerely Geoffrey Yates Lead Inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Cockerham Parochial Church of England Primary School, 22 March 2007

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion