Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Kemsing Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Nov 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Liz Kounnou
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
TN15 6PU
- Name on report verified
Kemsing Primary School
- URN verified
118277
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006 p.9
- You make an excellent contribution to your community by raising funds for local charities and through the work of the school council. p.11
- Their contributions to the school and to the local community are outstanding. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that all pupils from Years 3 to 6 reach sufficiently challenging targets in writing and science each year and make the progress they should. p.4
- Ensure that rigorous monitoring of progress leads to prompt and effective action as soon as the school identifies potential underachievement, and that governors are fully informed of pupils' progress. 2 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006 p.4
- Most pupils make satisfactory progress and by the time they leave school, standards are broadly average, except in writing, where they are lower. p.5
- In Key Stage 1, standards are above average and pupils achieve well. p.5
- In Key Stage 2, some pupils are not achieving as well as they could. p.5
- The progress of these pupils is slower in writing and science, given the standards they reached in Year 2. p.5
- There is not enough challenge for these pupils, particularly in their investigative work in science. p.5
- Pupils' progress in all subjects accelerates in Years 5 and 6. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,318
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Kemsing Primary School
p.1
118277 Unique Reference Number Kent Local Authority 291070 Inspection number 28 °29 November 2006 Inspection dates Liz Kounnou Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
West End School address Primary Type of school Kemsing Community School category Sevenoaks TN15 6PU 4 °11 Age range of pupils 01732 761236 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01732 763237 Fax number 193 Number on roll (school) Chris Arnold Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Eileen Mumford Headteacher 12 February 2001 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 291070 28 °29 November 2006 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Kemsing is a little smaller than the majority of primary schools and serves an area of economic advantage. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage with only around 6% from minority ethnic groups. The number of pupils joining during the school year is higher than usually found and the school has been growing steadily over recent years. The school identifies that 22% of the pupils have learning difficulties, which is a higher percentage than in most schools. However, the proportion with specific learning difficulties is less than 1%.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
Kemsing Primay School provides a satisfactory standard of education for its pupils. Since the last inspection, standards have been broadly average although there has been year on year variation. Significant staffing difficulties have slowed progress so that not all pupils have done as well as they should from Year 3 to Year 6. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Recently, school leaders successfully resolved the staffing difficulties and a determined new team of senior staff introduced appropriate strategies to tackle the legacy of problems. The school has already brought about some improvement in pupils' achievement and the Year 6 test results in 2006 were higher than those of the previous year. However, not all pupils have fully made up the ground lost and the results still reflect some underachievement. Teaching and learning are satisfactory but need to be even better in writing and science where pupils make
p.4
Grade: 3
particularly slow progress in Key Stage 2. The satisfactory quality of education in the Foundation Stage ensures children reach standards that are similar to those expected for their age. In Years 1 and 2, pupils continue to achieve well and reach above average standards. An adequate curriculum is enriched well with interesting things to do in many lessons and this means that pupils really enjoy coming to school and have good attitudes to their work. Pupils' personal development is good. They behave well and feel safe at school. Pupils are confident and often work well together. Their contributions to the school and to the local community are outstanding. They enthusiastically support local causes and the school council even contributes to the school's improvement plan. Although care, guidance and support for pupils are satisfactory overall, pastoral care is good. The school is well on the way towards a Healthy Schools award.
p.4
Grade: 3
The school has clearly resolved many of the previous difficulties but it still has further to go. Although pupils' progress is monitored, this does not always lead to prompt action where there are weaknesses. As a result, underachievement has not always been tackled rigorously. Pupils are beginning to know their new targets but these do not yet provide clear guidance about what to learn next. This is hampering progress, especially in writing and science from Years 3 to 6.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Ensure that all pupils from Years 3 to 6 reach sufficiently challenging targets in writing and science each year and make the progress they should. • Ensure that rigorous monitoring of progress leads to prompt and effective action as soon as the school identifies potential underachievement, and that governors are fully informed of pupils' progress. 2 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.4
Grade: 3
Most pupils make satisfactory progress and by the time they leave school, standards are broadly average, except in writing, where they are lower. In Key Stage 1, standards are above average and pupils achieve well. In Key Stage 2, some pupils are not achieving as well as they could. The progress of these pupils is slower in writing and science, given the standards they reached in Year 2. There is not enough challenge for these pupils, particularly in their investigative work in science. Pupils' progress in all subjects accelerates in Years 5 and 6. Nonetheless, in the 2006 national tests, the school's targets for English and mathematics were not met, although results were close to the national average. Pupils who have specific learning difficulties make satisfactory progress because care is taken to ensure they receive good support and reach suitable targets.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good. They make an outstanding contribution to the school and local community. The school council is full of confidence and works with other local schools as well as influencing its own school. Pupil 'buddies' proudly take care of younger children. Pupils behave well in lessons and at playtimes, making sure they keep themselves and others safe as they play. They say that bullying or rough play are very rare but, if they do occur, staff take them seriously. Pupils have a good understanding of how to lead a healthy lifestyle. They drink water throughout the day, organising this themselves. Attendance is satisfactory. Almost all parents say their children enjoy school. Pupils are enthusiastic about many lessons, some of which are great fun. Pupils develop satisfactory skills for their future well-being. They are particularly good at
p.5
Grade: 2
working in teams and these skills will stand them in good stead in later life. So too will the information and communication technology (ICT) skills they are acquiring in the new suite. However, pupils in Key Stage 2 are not developing basic skills in literacy as well as they could.
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching and learning are satisfactory and have improved now there is a permanent team of staff. A concerted effort to raise standards, especially in writing, is beginning to take effect. The leadership team provides clear guidance for staff to improve the quality of teaching and learning further, but there are still inconsistencies throughout the school. Marking in Year 6 is particularly diligent and much appreciated by the pupils. One girl said, 'It makes me feel nice because he does it to help us.' The 3 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006 comments help pupils to see how they could improve their work but this is not typical of marking throughout the school. Assessment information is now gathered regularly but it is not used effectively to ensure that pupils build on their skills in lessons. For example, there is not a clear enough method of monitoring progress in science from
p.5
Grade: 3
year to year, so that some of the work is not challenging enough, particularly for the most able pupils.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory. It is enlivened particularly well by various visits and visitors, which capture pupils' interest and imagination. Pupils consider that the number of exciting visits is one of the best things about the school. One parent wrote, 'There is a fantastic range of clubs', and others agreed that these activities add significantly to pupils' enjoyment. The curriculum does not consistently ensure that pupils build on their skills from year to year. There is some mismatch between pupils' achievements at the end of Year 2 and the curriculum that is planned for Year 3 pupils, especially in writing and science. As a result, some pupils lose the ground they gained in Years 1 and 2. There are not enough opportunities for pupils in Years 3 to 6 to improve their writing skills in lessons across the curriculum. The senior leadership team is fully aware of these issues and is beginning to take action.
p.6
Grade: 3
Care, guidance and support for pupils are satisfactory. One parent singled out the caring staff as the school's best feature. The good relationships between staff and pupils contribute strongly to pupils' happiness. Pupils know that they can approach staff with confidence if they have any problems. Procedures to ensure pupils' safety meet requirements. The school is working to improve the guidance that pupils receive about how to reach the next steps for learning. A new system of sharing targets with pupils is being tried. However, the advice given on how they can judge their own achievements differs from class to class; this leads to some confusion and limits the effectiveness of the new system
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory. The new senior leadership team is inexperienced but makes up for this with determination. The school's own evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses is satisfactory. School leaders regularly monitor the quality of teaching and learning and collect a wealth of data about pupils' progress in English and mathematics. However, they do not make the best use of all the data to monitor the rate of progress for different groups in English, mathematics and science. This means that action is not taken early enough to help pupils who start to fall behind. Governors are not fully informed about pupils' progress. Nonetheless, they have been 4 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006 extremely supportive and contributed well towards resolving the recent staffing crisis. The capacity to make improvements is satisfactory and indeed some improvements
p.6
Grade: 3
have been secured. Standards have risen and teaching has improved, but there is still substantial underachievement in specific areas that needs to be tackled more rigorously. 5 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006 .
p.7
Grade: 3
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you all for making us so welcome and helping us when we visited your school. We enjoyed talking to you about your work. Here are the things that we think are best about your school: • Pupils in Year 1 and Year 2 make good progress in most of their lessons. • You all behave well and are very polite in lessons and around the school. • You make an excellent contribution to your community by raising funds for local charities and through the work of the school council. • There are a lot of extra activities for you to do that you really enjoy. • All the adults in the school look after you well and you feel safe. These are the things that we think could be better: • The writing targets that are set for you do not always take account of what you already know. • In science, the work you are asked to do from Year 3 to Year 6 does not always help you to improve your skills quickly enough. • We have asked your teachers to make sure that you all keep up with your work by checking
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
the progress you are making more often. Your teachers will work to make these improvements as quickly as possible, and we are sure you will work with them to help do this. Thank you again for being so helpful and friendly when we came to see you. 9 Inspection Report: Kemsing Primary School, 28 °29 November 2006
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion