Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Martins Wood Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Jun 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
David Jones
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
Martins Wood Primary School
- URN verified
117285
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- 1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.7
- The range of curriculum opportunities provided is excellent, the educational environment is stimulating, well resourced and particularly well-maintained. p.4
- As inspectors we were impressed by the excellent range of curriculum opportunities provided and the stimulating, well resourced and particularly well-maintained environment in which you learn. p.8
- As a result of the school’s very positive ethos, the pupils’ personal development is outstanding and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development good. p.4
- This is a good school with a number of outstanding features. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Continue to improve standards of achievement in Key Stage 1. p.5
- Improve the quality of the pupils’ written work at Key Stage 2. p.5
- Use all monitoring and evaluative evidence rigorously to eliminate the inconsistencies in achievement. procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. p.5
- Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language7
“Provision for modern foreign languages is outstanding.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,696
- shorter than usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4 - 11 Inspection date 7 June 2007 Inspection number 290783 Unique Reference Number 117285 Local Authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 290783 Inspection date 7 June 2007 Reporting inspector David Jones HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4 - 11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School 450
p.1
Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mrs S Heraty Headteacher Mr T Evans Date of previous school inspection 1 - 2 July 2002
p.1
School address Mildmay Road Stevenage Hertfordshire SG1 5RT
p.1
Telephone number 01438222602 Fax number 01438222603 Martins Wood Primary School Inspection report Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one Additional Inspector. Inspectors evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: standards of literacy, the quality of provision in Key Stage 1 and the use of assessment to track pupil progress; by gathering evidence from lesson observations, work scrutinies, pupil interviews, parental questionnaires and assessment records. Other aspects of the school’s work were not investigated in detail, but inspectors found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own assessments, as given its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.
p.3
Description of the school
Larger than the average primary school, the proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups and of those learning English as an additional language is below average. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is average. The social and economic characteristics of the local community are mixed.
p.3
Description of the school
The number of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is above average although the number of pupils with a statement of special educational need is low. Attainment on entry has varied annually and the proportion of girls and boys in a year group fluctuates. In recent years the school has achieved a number of national awards: National ICT Mark, Specialist Schools Trust National ICT Register, Basic Skills Quality Mark, Football Charter Mark, Expect Respect Seal of Approval, Arts Mark Gold, and Investors in People.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Grade 1 Outstanding Grade 2 Good Grade 3 Satisfactory Grade 4 Inadequate Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007
p.3
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
This is a good school with a number of outstanding features. The range of curriculum opportunities provided is excellent, the educational environment is stimulating, well resourced and particularly well-maintained. A range of curriculum developments have achieved national recognition in recent years. Provision for modern foreign languages is outstanding. Physical education (PE) is taught by a specialist in both Key Stages. Pupils receive the nationally recommended time for sport and pupils commented that this has been an area of marked improvement. The facilities for information and communication technology (ICT) rival that to be found in secondary schools; some of the most effective lessons observed by inspectors used these facilities.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
As a result of the school’s very positive ethos, the pupils’ personal development is outstanding and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development good. Pupils consistently praise the school, they enjoy their learning and behaviour is often very good. Care, welfare and guidance are good. Pastoral care has many very strong features. Pupils know what to do to stay safe and are confident they have an adult they can turn to if they have a problem. However, the school council felt more could be done to check occasional bullying. Although most pupils know what they had to do to improve, the use of assessment to guide teaching and learning varies across the school. More could be done to use the extensive range of assessment data available to enhance the learning, particularly in English. Provision at the school has helped to develop healthy lifestyles well. PE is very popular, most pupils walk to
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
school and the range of healthy food available at lunchtime has been extended. The school’s drama and music performances make a significant contribution to the community. The pupils develop good mathematical, scientific and computer skills which contribute to their future economic well-being.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Foundation Stage provision is very good and pupils make good progress, often from a low initial level. Between 2004 and 2006, outcomes at Key Stage 1 were below the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. The unconfirmed results of the 2007 teacher assessments at Key Stage 1 are more positive than in previous years with efforts to address the weaknesses in the pupils’ writing beginning to have an impact.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
In the 2006 national tests at Key Stage 2, standards and achievement were good overall. The proportion of pupils achieving or exceeding the national expectations was well above average in mathematics and science; however, more able pupils underachieved in their written English. Evidence from a detailed scrutiny of work and a review of the school’s data reveals that current standards of writing are satisfactory in Key Stage 2. The pupils’ books reveal that despite often possessing good reading skills for their age they lack the confidence to write extended sentences and use descriptive or imaginative vocabulary to attain the higher national curriculum levels.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Teaching and learning are good. The most effective teaching provided clear guidance, challenging tasks and very good interaction between pupils and teachers. In these lessons, high quality questioning sought extended responses that used subject vocabulary accurately. All lessons were well organised but some opportunities to extend learning were missed where pupils could have been more Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007 involved in their own learning. Many of the adults who take supporting roles in the classroom are effective instructors and manage activities well. The provision for pupils who have learning difficulties and disabilities is good; a recently introduced intensive support programme appears to be helping those with the most limited literacy skills.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Overall, leadership and management are good. The school has grown successfully. It has been extensively refurbished and imaginative curriculum developments have been brought forward with energy and clear direction. There is a strong collegiate approach to curriculum development between senior managers and those with a phase responsibility as middle managers. Staff development and support are good. Senior managers were invited to observe teaching with HMI; the views they expressed concurred with the judgements given by inspectors. However, the school does not maintain a central record of the monitoring and evaluation of teaching and therefore lacks the capacity to effectively correlate, assessment outcomes with classroom methodology. As a result standards and achievement vary significantly between the core subjects.
p.5
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
A number of parents expressed concerns regarding, what in their view were significant levels of homework; pupils commented that they found it ‘about right’. Similarly, a number of parents raised questions about the difficult access to the school site via a stepped underpass; the local authority has given governors an undertaking that a pedestrian crossing will be provided close to the school before the start of the next academic year.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
Continue to improve standards of achievement in Key Stage 1. Improve the quality of the pupils’ written work at Key Stage 2. Use all monitoring and evaluative evidence rigorously to eliminate the inconsistencies in achievement. procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk.
p.5
Inspection judgements
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate. School Overall
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements 2
p.7
Achievement and standards
How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners 2
p.7
Personal development and well-being
How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? 1 The extent of learners’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 How well learners enjoy their education 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
The quality of provision
How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of learners’ needs? How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? How well are learners cared for, guided and supported? 2
p.7
Leadership and management
How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? Yes Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? No
p.7
Leadership and management
1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.7
Inspection of Martins Wood Primary School, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 5RT
Thank you for contributing to this inspection. It was very good to meet so many of you and see how much you enjoy being at this school. As inspectors we were impressed by the excellent range of curriculum opportunities provided and the stimulating, well resourced and particularly well-maintained environment in which you learn.
p.8
Inspection of Martins Wood Primary School, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 5RT
Many of you were very pleased with the opportunities to learn a modern foreign language and the high quality physical education. Many of you said how much you and younger members of your family liked the Foundation Stage. I really enjoyed seeing how well everything works in that area. Your personal development is outstanding and your behaviour is often very good. The pastoral care you receive has many very strong features and most of you understand what to do to improve your work. However, there is more that you can do to improve your writing. Parents can help by checking that you use imaginative words when you are asked to write stories and descriptions. We have asked the school to use its new monitoring systems to see how well you achieve.
p.8
Inspection of Martins Wood Primary School, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 5RT
The school council felt more could be done to check occasional bullying and the headteacher will talk to you about how you can be involved in this. A number of your parents wrote to me about the need for a ‘Zebra’ crossing near the school and I understand that work should start on this in the summer holidays.
p.8
Inspection of Martins Wood Primary School, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 5RT
I thoroughly enjoyed my visit to Martins Wood; it is a good school with a number of outstanding features. Perhaps I will meet you again one day, I hope so.
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion