Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Woodrow First School

Inspected 29 Sept 2006 · published 20 Oct 2006 · URN 116730

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Sept 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gerald Griffin

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B98 7UZ

  • Name on report verified

    Redditch, Woodrow First School

  • URN verified

    116730

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelyenjoyexceptionallymake good progresseffectiveimprovedclear
Criticismweaknessbelownot consistentlyinadequateweakpoortoo slowlacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1297w+63
  • What needs to improve983w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,242
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report Redditch, Woodrow First School

p.1

116730 Unique Reference Number Worcestershire Local Authority 290615 Inspection number 28 °29 September 2006 Inspection dates Gerald Griffin Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Longdon Close School address First Type of school Woodrow South Community School category Redditch B98 7UZ 3 °8 Age range of pupils 01527 527619 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01527 500497 Fax number 289 Number on roll (school) Phil Mould Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Sue Hawkes Headteacher 21 May 2001 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 290615 28 °29 September 2006 3°8 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school serves an area of considerable economic hardship. Most of the pupils are of White British heritage. Children enter the school with standards that are well below the expected levels. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is above the national average, as is the proportion of pupils who join and leave the school at times other than the start of the school year. The new headteacher has been in post since September 2006.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

Woodrow First is a good school. Standards of achievement are rising and pupils' personal development thrives in the school's friendly and purposeful environment. Pupils really enjoy school and their behaviour is outstanding. They are very polite and considerate to each other and to adults. Pupils feel very safe at school and are very safety conscious. They talk proudly about their charity work and the role of the school council that are developing their good sense of community. Parents are very happy with all aspects of the school and rightly think that the care, guidance and support of pupils are good. Typically, they say 'I am more than pleased with my child's progress and have never had any concerns about their welfare.' Good teaching and learning underpin this positive picture. Lessons are well ordered, interesting and challenging. As a result, pupils' achievement is good. However, teachers' plans do not consistently make good use of assessment data to identify and rectify

p.4

Grade: 2

specific problems in pupils' learning. Good provision ensures children make good progress and achieve well in the lively Nursery and Reception classes. Half of the children reach the expected levels by the time they start Year 1. Pupils continue to make good progress in Years 1 to 4, especially in reading. While standards are below average overall by the end of Year 4, standards in reading are average. Writing is a weakness because pupils' handwriting is too slow and their spelling lacks accuracy. The curriculum is good and makes an important contribution to pupils' enjoyment of learning and good achievement through its creative and imaginative approaches. The school makes excellent use of its pool and the regular swimming lessons support well pupils' efforts to take regular exercise as part of their good understanding of healthy lifestyles. Pupils readily participate in the wealth of clubs that extend their interests

p.4

Grade: 2

and aspirations. Year 4 pupils are really looking forward to their residential weekend in Malvern! Leadership and management are good. The new headteacher is already having a significant impact on the school and is providing clear direction and purpose. The school has a largely accurate view of its effectiveness because it regularly monitors its performance and makes good use of evaluation to raise standards in most aspects of its work. However, the lack of full involvement of subject co-ordinators in monitoring and evaluating the performance of pupils means that the school's overview on what it needs to do to improve standards is restricted. The effective steps taken to raise standards since the last inspection and the recent record of improvements show the school has a good capacity to make further gains.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve pupils' handwriting and spelling so as to improve writing standards. • Ensure teachers consistently use assessment data effectively to inform their planning. • Fully involve subject coordinators in monitoring and evaluating the pupils' progress so as to give a clear view on what needs to be done to raise standards further. 2 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.4

Grade: 2

In the Foundation Stage classes, children achieve well. They make especially good progress in speaking, understanding number and in their personal and social development. They quickly learn to recognise letters and the sounds they make, providing them with a firm foundation for reading. Children's progress in writing is slower. In Years 1 to 4, standards are below average overall. Pupils' sound breadth of vocabulary gives them a clear understanding of the text they are reading. Their mental mathematics is a strength, but problem solving is a relative weakness because they find it difficult to interpret questions. Writing is the weakest subject. While pupils present work well and enjoy writing for different audiences, their slow handwriting and weak spelling makes writing longer pieces of work laborious. The achievement of all pupils, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities and the few children at the early stages of learning English, is good.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good. Pupils respect and value each other and the world around them. Their outstanding behaviour comes from a clear understanding of right and wrong. Pupils' appreciation of their place in a multicultural society is well developed. Pupils report no bullying and are confident in approaching a member of the school's staff if they have a worry and say their concerns are quickly and effectively dealt with. Pupils have a good understanding of healthy lifestyles. They understand the need for regular exercise and do their best to keep fit. Pupils are clear about the pitfalls of a poor diet but not all choose a healthy lunch box! While their use of computers is good, below average standards in writing and mathematics are hindering their preparation for future economic well-being. Robust and effective measures have led to a significant

p.5

Grade: 2

improvement in attendance since the last inspection with current figures showing it to be average.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teachers have good subject knowledge and understanding and confidently use a good variety of teaching styles to successfully engage, interest and challenge pupils. Very good class management leads to outstanding behaviour of pupils and good attitudes towards their work which contribute to pupils' good achievement. Pupils work well independently, a practice successfully established in the Nursery and Reception. Pupils' 3 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006 learning is well supported by teaching assistants who have a clear understanding of the different needs of pupils in the class. Teachers' planning is not sharply enough focused on rectifying areas of specific weakness in learning because they do not consistently analyse assessment data effectively and this slows the rate of pupils' progress in some aspects of work.

p.5

Grade: 2

The exciting and varied curriculum meets statutory requirements. The Foundation Stage curriculum gets children off to a good start and lays a secure basis for future learning through a wide range of stimulating resources and activities. In Years 1 to 4, there is rightly a strong focus on English and mathematics, which enables pupils to achieve well from below average starting points. Other subjects flourish, too, and pupils talk enthusiastically about art and design and design and technology lessons. Arrangements for gifted and talented pupils are limited and the school recognises the need to identify more clearly how their needs are to be addressed more effectively.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides good care, support and guidance. Sensitive support and care is provided for pupils with learning difficulties or medical problems. This enables these pupils to participate fully in lessons and make good progress. The school cares for vulnerable children well by making good use of external agencies and specialists to promote their welfare when the need arises. There is a successful record of supporting families shown by the very good progress made by children whose parents participate in 'family learning' courses organised by the school. Child protection procedures and health and safety arrangements are robust. Procedures to assess pupils' work and track their progress are good. Pupils are largely meeting the challenging targets set for them. However, older pupils are not always clear as to what their academic targets are and this limits the opportunities for them to take responsibility for their own learning. The school provides very effective

p.6

Grade: 2

additional support for individual pupils who under-perform, through booster classes.

p.6

Grade: 2

The new headteacher's drive to raise standards is shared by all staff and governors. In a very short period of time, she has improved the quality of lesson monitoring to focus on accelerating learning. She has also improved assessment procedures so that pupils' progress can be better followed and underachievement quickly spotted. Governance is satisfactory and is improving through much needed training to enable 4 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006 governors to interpret data and challenge the school's view about its performance. The monitoring and evaluation of many aspects of performance, such as personal development, are good. This has led to policies that have successfully improved pupils' behaviour, attendance levels and reading standards. However, the school agrees that subject coordinators need to be more active in monitoring and evaluating and taking responsibility for raising standards of work in their subjects or the year groups that

p.6

Grade: 2

they lead. 5 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006 .

p.7

Grade: 2

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for welcoming us to your school and being so friendly. You clearly enjoy being in a school in which you all get on so well and help each other. We enjoyed our conversations with you about your work and the other things that you do at school. We have judged that the school provides you with a good education. Here are some of the 'highlights' • You really enjoy your learning and work hard for your teachers. • You are extremely well behaved. • You have a very interesting range of lessons and clubs. • All of the staff care for you very well. • The youngest children get off to a good start in Nursery and Reception, and you all do well in reading. • Your headteacher is leading the school well. What we have asked your school to do now • Improve your handwriting and written work. • Make better use of your marks and test results to plan work that will help you achieve more. • Ensure that those teachers with responsibilities for subjects check on the work that you

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

do. Best wishes for your future and the future of the school. 9 Inspection Report: Redditch, Woodrow First School, 28 °29 September 2006

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion