Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St James' Church of England Junior School

Inspected 26 Sept 2006 · published 16 Oct 2006 · URN 115606

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

John Lilly

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Sept 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Lilly

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    GL1 4JU

  • URN verified

    115606

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyenjoyfeel safeclearcaringstrongmake good progressimproved
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysweaknessestoo lowweaknessshortcomingsfailstoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1335w+48
  • What needs to improve1620w+7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,916
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report St James Church of England Junior School

p.1

115606 Unique Reference Number Gloucestershire Local Authority 290273 Inspection number 26 September 2006 Inspection date John Lilly Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Upton Street School address Junior Type of school Gloucester Voluntary controlled School category GL1 4JU 7 °11 Age range of pupils 01452 520714 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01452 303384 Fax number 150 Number on roll (school) Pat Gifford Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Kathleen Maloney Headteacher 1 November 2001 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection date Age group 290273 26 September 2006 7 °11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is a slightly smaller than average junior school. It serves a multi-cultural, inner-city community with significant levels of economic and social deprivation. The number of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is average, although the proportion with statements of special educational needs is above average. The number of pupils for whom English is an additional language is average but increasing. The pupils come from many cultural backgrounds, including a small but significant number of Muslim children of Asian heritage. The school has an increasing number of pupils who are either refugees or immigrants to the United Kingdom. The number of pupils joining or leaving the school at other than the usual times is above average. The post of deputy headteacher was vacant at the time of the inspection. The school has a learning mentor who works with disaffected pupils and their families.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory standard of education. Standards have been much too low and have only recently started to improve. A warm and caring ethos is the school’s major strength. One pupil said ‘I love my school, my teachers and my friends.’ The curriculum is broad and well supported by activities after school. The pupils benefit greatly from good levels of care and support. Pupils make satisfactory progress in all classes and attain average standards by Year 6. This was not the case until last year and so the recent improvement in standards and achievement is only the beginning of an upward and necessary journey. The pupils enjoy school, feel safe here, know about the importance of leading healthy lifestyles and behave well. Teaching is satisfactory but many pupils say they could be doing even better, and inspectors agree. Work that more able pupils are given does not always stretch them enough and pupils

p.4

Grade: 3

of average attainment sometimes need more time to practise what they have learned. Pupils are not involved enough in agreeing their targets and in how to achieve them. The school is well managed and orderly, but the leadership is not rigorous enough in setting high enough standards, or in delegating responsibility and ensuring accountability for bringing about improvements. The way the school is evaluating its effectiveness is improving but remains confused in some respects. Because of this, the school is not building upon the pupils’ good personal development to bring about the high achievement parents and children want, and the teachers know they can achieve. Pupils’ attendance and punctuality are inadequate and the school is not doing enough to bring about improvements. The strong governing body is completely behind the drive to further improve the school, and parents are very supportive. Although

p.4

Grade: 3

the school’s overall effectiveness is satisfactory, its performance in two respects is inadequate. Before the school’s next section 5 inspection, Ofsted inspectors may visit the school to monitor the progress that is made in remedying these weaknesses. The school would receive two to five days notice of such a visit.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Set precise and challenging targets for school improvement, delegate accountability and responsibility clearly and establish focused self-evaluation to raise standards further. • Involve each pupil in agreeing his/her targets and how to achieve them. • Implement clear strategies to improve attendance and punctuality. • Ensure that all pupils make good progress by providing them with work that is well matched to meet their needs.

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory and standards average. Pupils join Year 3 with broadly average attainment and leave Year 6 attaining average standards in English, mathematics and science. At the last inspection, standards were much too low and 2 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006 this remained the case until recently. In 2006, results at the end of Year 6 improved and the improvement has been sustained with current Year 6 pupils. Good support for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities helps them make good progress. This is equally the case for pupils for whom English is an additional language. One parent said ‘My son has not got problems with going to school because he now has simple words which he can use to talk.’ Pupils of average ability make satisfactory progress. They feel rightly that they could make better progress if teachers made sure that they

p.4

Grade: 3

really understand what they have learned earlier, and they had more time to practise what they were learning now. By contrast, while higher ability pupils make steady progress, they could do more challenging work. A key weakness for many pupils is their speaking and listening. They find it difficult to express their ideas and thinking, and do not always understand what they hear.

p.5

Grade: 2

Personal development and well-being are good and are a key strength of the school. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is also good. Pupils appreciate why faith and belief are important to their lives and have a good understanding of what is right and wrong, and why. They learn how to help the school and their community succeed and to value both their own cultures and those of others. They enjoy school and want to succeed. They feel safe and know how to remain safe. They want to be healthy and know what they need to do to be so. Pupils’ views on the school are voiced through an active school council, for example, by expressing opinions about healthy choices at lunch times. The pupils understand the contribution they need to make and why their learning is important. A parent was right when he said ‘The school’s behaviour policy has a lasting impact on all the children.’ Pupils willingly

p.5

Grade: 2

work in teams and show initiative. Even so, unsatisfactory attendance and punctuality are wasting the benefits of this good personal development. Most pupils behave well and are keen to make friends. However, a significant few find this difficult. A key area in which the school has improved is in meeting the personal needs of these pupils, for example, through the work of the learning mentor.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Teachers have the skills and knowledge to be very effective, and show this in their planning. For example, there are clear objectives for each lesson and children are told what their teacher will look for in their work. Marking shows clearly how and why children can improve their learning. Teachers manage lessons well. Learning is at its best when the teachers make clear what each pupil should achieve and what they need to do so. As a parent said, “My children are aware of the ‘must, shoulds and coulds’, and this helps.” In a very good lesson, the 3 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006 teacher focused on developing the pupils’ speaking and listening skills and, consequently, the pupils were able to grapple with the very challenging and exciting work that followed. When this happens, the learning lifts off because the pupils are

p.5

Grade: 3

excited and eager to tackle new things. The main factor constraining pupils’ higher achievement is that teachers do not identify precise targets often enough, tailoring them to individual needs and agreeing with each child how to achieve them. As a result, teacher and child miss a learning target because they do not identify exactly what is needed before moving on. The school has much data on pupils’ progress but this is not analysed rigorously enough to identify the reasons for underachievement and then to act quickly to address them. This also means that teaching is not always clearly focused on the next step in learning.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good. The required areas are covered and given due attention, with good emphasis on literacy and numeracy. The curriculum makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development. The wide experiences outside lessons raise pupils' aspirations as well as extending their learning. As one parent said, ‘The school takes great pride, diligence and a conscientious approach to giving my children every opportunity.’ The pupils find their learning interesting and understand why, for example, thinking about what they read is important. The curriculum has breadth, depth and balance but has scope for greater relevance, for example, by making certain that children understand why it is important to use what they have learned earlier to tackle new work. In their keenness to cover the curriculum, the teachers do not always make certain that all children consolidate their learning. This can serve to reduce the

p.6

Grade: 2

pupils’ confidence and so hold them back. As several said, ‘We move on before I am ready!’

p.6

Grade: 3

Care and support are good and are strengths of the school. Pupils value highly the school’s warm and caring ethos. Children with learning difficulties or disabilities are well supported. Those who join the school both at the start of Year 3 and in other year groups feel welcomed and most settle quickly. One parent commented ‘My child is new to the school and is very happy ° she longs for each new week.’ The school recognises and values the different cultural and religious backgrounds of the pupils, for example, Islam, and pupils feel their individual cultures are understood. The school maintains a healthy and safe environment, making these a high priority. Procedures for safeguarding children are secure. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities have their needs clearly identified, and teaching assistants play a major role in guiding these children. The learning mentor is making a major contribution in helping the few

p.6

Grade: 3

pupils who feel ‘against’ rather than ‘for’ the school. Academic guidance is satisfactory but has some shortcomings. Pupils are not involved enough in agreeing their targets and how to achieve them. As a result, they are not always clear about what aspect of 4 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006 their work they are trying to improve or why. The guidance parents and pupils receive on attendance and punctuality is confused. Pupils and parents are not held rigorously to account when absences are not explained or children are frequently late for school. Leadership does not ensure that everyone knows what is expected, for example, there are too few displays around the school that emphasise the importance of good attendance and punctuality and the attendance that pupils actually achieve.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. Good management enables the life and work of the school to proceed efficiently, creating an orderly, caring and calm environment. The headteacher maintains a school where children feel safe and cared for, behave well and want to learn. However, weaknesses in leadership mean that these good qualities are not used as a springboard for good learning. There is a lack of direction to overcome problems and achieve the best of which the school is capable. The two managers responsible for the upper and lower year groups have a clear understanding of what needs to be done and why, but have not received the direction and impetus necessary for them to follow this up. Consequently, they cannot provide the leadership of which they are capable. More accurate self-evaluation has begun the process of improvement. However, self-evaluation is not sharp and clearly focused enough and sometimes fails to respond

p.7

Grade: 3

to the evidence. For example, the school evaluates teaching as good when alongside this evaluating the pupils’ progress as inadequate. Although the school aims to ’make a difference’, leadership too often accepts some problems as insoluble when this is not the case. One reason why problems may seem insoluble is that many initiatives work alongside each other rather than working together in a highly focused way. This in turn is because self-evaluation does not identify clearly what needs doing most and then where the effort should be made immediately. Despite this, the school has identified that standards need to improve and has begun to achieve success in this area. Successful strategies have been implemented to make improvements in, for example, teaching and behaviour management. The governing body is strong and has a good understanding of the strengths of the school but also the things that are holding it back. Teachers and middle managers

p.7

Grade: 3

know what needs to be done and have the capacity to achieve improvements. These strengths have made a difference, as shown by the progress made over the last year. The school has sound capacity to improve but there is still much to achieve. 5 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006 .

p.7

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 4 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

St James Church of England Junior School, Upton Street, Gloucester, GL1 4JU Thank you very much for making us feel so welcome and making our visit so enjoyable. You helped us to do our job by giving us your time and speaking so honestly and clearly. We think your school is providing you with much of what you need. Your learning is improving but needs to become even better. We agree with you that school is a good place to be. You feel safe and cared for and enjoy school. You are making satisfactory progress but we think you could do even better. You try hard, behave well and are eager to learn. The school council does an important job in the work of the school. Your representatives made it very clear that they wanted dinners to improve because you know what you need to remain healthy. The pupils we spoke to were thoughtful, mature and keen to succeed and all of you were courteous and polite. Well done! You can be very proud of yourselves.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

To help St James become an even better school, we have said it should: • Make clear plans to help you all learn more quickly • Work more closely with you when choosing your targets and deciding ways to achieve them • Make more efforts to ensure that you all attend regularly and arrive on time • Build upon your good attitudes to help you reach even higher standards. As you can see ° you have your part to play. Best of luck! 9 Inspection Report: St James Church of England Junior School, 26 September 2006

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion