Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Crosscrake CofE Primary School

Inspected 15 Nov 2006 · published 30 Nov 2006 · URN 112316

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Pat Kime

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Nov 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pat Kime

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    LA8 0LB

  • Name on report verified

    Crosscrake C of E Primary School

  • URN verified

    112316

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveexceptionallyconsistentlyeffectivelyenjoymake good progresseffective
Criticisminadequatenot good enoughshortcomingslowlacktoo lownot alwaystoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1613w+57
  • What needs to improve1421w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,980
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report Crosscrake C of E Primary School

p.1

112316 Unique Reference Number Cumbria Local Authority 289244 Inspection number 14 °15 November 2006 Inspection dates Pat Kime HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Stainton School address Primary Type of school Kendal, Cumbria Voluntary aided School category LA8 0LB 3 °11 Age range of pupils 01539 560410 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01539 560410 Fax number 104 Number on roll (school) Mr Simon Lewis Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Linda Fletcher Headteacher 1 November 2001 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 289244 14 °15 November 2006 3°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This smaller than average school, a few miles south of Kendal, is attended by pupils from the immediate rural area and beyond. Many pupils are collected by bus. The area is socially and economically advantaged. All the pupils are of White British heritage with English as their first language. The proportion of pupils in receipt of free school meals is very low. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is broadly average but a higher than average proportion has statements of special educational needs. Five of the pupils are in Nursery. They attend part-time, joining the Reception pupils in the afternoons. A new headteacher started in September 2006, after four years of short-lived arrangements. The school holds several awards including Healthy Schools accreditation.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school has suffered from the lack of continuity in leadership and management. There is now a permanent headteacher who has gained the confidence of staff, parents and governors and got the school back on track. The school now has good capacity for improvement. The parents’ and carers’ confidence in the potential for improvement is summed up by one who wrote of the headteacher, ‘She will help our school go forward positively’. Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory, given their starting points, but their rate of progress varies between classes, reflecting the quality of teaching. Taken overall, the teaching is satisfactory. It is satisfactory in the Foundation Stage (Nursery and Reception) and in Key Stage 1 (Years 1 and 2), except for writing where it is inadequate. In Key Stage 2 (Years 3 to 6) teaching is very good with much that is of outstanding quality. Pupils make sound progress in the Foundation Stage. In Key Stage 1 progress is

p.4

Grade: 3

satisfactory in reading and mathematics but writing standards are too low and have been so for a few years. Progress is more rapid in Key Stage 2 so that by the time pupils leave the school they generally reach high standards. At Year 6 standards are consistently very high in science. In English and mathematics there has been more variation over the years. The school’s curriculum is planned carefully to ensure pupils cover all the required work. However, in several subjects, planning is not rigorous enough to ensure work becomes more demanding from one year to the next. Pupils’ personal development is good. They enjoy school and have positive attitudes to learning. Their behaviour in lessons and at other times in school is good. Lunchtimes, for instance, are pleasant social occasions. Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep safe and healthy. They make a positive contribution to school life, with even

p.4

Grade: 3

the youngest carrying out jobs in the classroom. They also contribute positively to the wider community. Pastoral care is very good but the academic guidance and support provided for pupils varies. It is not adequately underpinned by systems to keep track of pupils’ progress. The school harnesses support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities well. This, together with good support from teaching assistants enables them to make good progress. Several parents wrote praising the quality of support for these pupils and the way the school includes them fully. The headteacher is providing good leadership for the school. She has a clear sense of direction and understands the issues the school faces. She has made a good start on tackling these and has promoted teamwork well. The leadership of subjects of the curriculum has not been developed sufficiently and in some subjects it has suffered

p.4

Grade: 3

from discontinuity. Governors work in partnership with the headteacher and share her determination to improve the school.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the teaching of writing in Key Stage 1 so that pupils reach higher standards by the end of Year 2. • Establish effective systems which enable staff to: 2 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006 • keep track of pupils’ progress as they move up the school • know whether all pupils are doing as well as they can • nip any underachievement in the bud. • Develop the role of subject leaders in improving pupils’ achievement and developing teaching and the curriculum. • Plan more systematically to ensure pupils make progress in developing understanding and skills across subjects.

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. Year groups are small and what pupils can do when they start school varies considerably but, taken overall, attainment on entry is above average. By the end of the Reception year, standards are above average and this represents satisfactory achievement for the pupils. In 2006, results in the national tests at the end of Key Stage 1 picked up after a three year decline. However, writing standards remained at a low level and they are not yet high enough in the present Year 2. Pupils do well in Key Stage 2 and usually reach high standards. In English and mathematics standards have fluctuated a lot over the years whereas in science they have been consistently well above average over the same period. This shows just how well the pupils can achieve when the curriculum is well-planned and teaching is really good. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are supported well by skilled

p.5

Grade: 3

support staff. As a result they are able to join in normal lessons and they make good progress towards their clear and appropriate personal targets.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. This is seen in their good spiritual, moral and social development and satisfactory cultural development. Pupils develop personal skills, such as responsibility and independence, which set them up well to benefit from the next stage of their education and to contribute to the community. For example, they manage the sale of healthy snacks at break times, ensuring a profit which goes to support a child in Nepal. Pupils are well-informed about how to stay safe and they appreciate the importance of a healthy diet. They make a good contribution to decisions about school life, through the recently re-instated school council. Pupils’ well above average rate of attendance reflects their enjoyment of school. They are well-behaved and they try very hard with their work, except when lessons are mundane. By the time they are in Key Stage 2 pupils have the confidence to tackle demanding work. Relationships are good and pupils work

p.5

Grade: 2

well together. They confirm that staff deal rapidly and effectively with the few minor incidents of bullying. 3 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching is satisfactory overall but it varies from outstanding to inadequate. This was evident from the lessons seen, pupils’ achievement and the work in their books. Staff have positive relationships with pupils and lessons are usually enjoyable. Indeed pupils say that their teachers ‘make lessons fun’. In the Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 the bulk of teaching is satisfactory. However, in the Foundation Stage staff do not always expect enough of the pupils, especially the more able older ones. In Key Stage 1 the teaching of writing is not good enough. Over-reliance on worksheets means that pupils have too few opportunities to develop the skills of independent writing and the more able are not challenged to work at a high level. In Key Stage 2 teaching is consistently of at least a good quality and a significant amount is outstanding. Consequently, pupils make rapid progress and achieve very well in this

p.6

Grade: 3

key stage. The key differences between the satisfactory teaching and that of a high quality are in: • the depth and extent of teachers’ knowledge of the subjects they teach • the expectations of what pupils can achieve • the pace at which teachers push learning on within lessons • the match of work to pupils’ different learning needs. In the best lessons, all these elements come together with the result that every pupil thoroughly enjoys working intensively and producing their very best.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school offers a satisfactory curriculum which covers all that is required. It is organised to avoid repetition in the mixed-age classes. However, the school’s planning for pupils to acquire new skills and develop their understanding across all subjects as they get older is not sufficiently robust. It depends too much on teachers building this into their daily lesson planning. The curriculum is enriched with a range of educational visits and visitors and there is a good emphasis on teaching pupils how to keep healthy and safe. Some additional activities and clubs are offered. A few are at lunchtime but most are in association with the after-school care provider and, because of transport arrangements, not all pupils can attend. The provision of pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils have good opportunities to take responsibility, develop independence, and contribute to the life of the school

p.6

Grade: 3

community. They are taught about different lifestyles and have many opportunities to respond to the needs of others, for instance through raising funds for charitable causes. 4 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

Overall, the care, guidance and support provided for pupils are good. Pastoral care is very good whilst academic guidance and support are satisfactory. The arrangements for safeguarding pupils meet requirements fully. The school works well in partnership with other agencies to support pupils, especially those who need extra help. Staff know their pupils well and generally meet their needs. But the systems for checking on progress are at an early stage of development and at present do little to help the school ensure that all pupils do well enough. Teachers practice in setting targets for pupils is inconsistent. Consequently, some pupils are not sure what they need to do to improve their work.

p.7

Grade: 3

The succession of short-lived arrangements for the leadership and management of the school over the last four years have had a detrimental effect. The new headteacher has already had a positive impact. Her picture of the school is accurate in most respects. She has identified what needs to be done and started tackling shortcomings, such as the absence of an adequate system to keep track of pupils’ progress. In this she has been aided by the action plan produced by the last acting headteacher and the local authority’s review of the school in January 2006. Additionally, she has raised morale and gained the confidence and support of staff, governors and parents. Typical parental comments included, ‘we feel that the new permanent headteacher has had a positive impact even at this early stage’. All this shows good leadership and puts the school in a good position to improve. The headteacher has analysed pupils’ test results carefully and accurately and she has

p.7

Grade: 3

a good idea of how well pupils are doing because she teaches each week in every class. She has planned a programme for checking the quality of teaching and the planning of work. The role of subject leader is generally underdeveloped and other staff have not been as fully involved in the processes of monitoring and evaluating the school’s performance as they could be. Nonetheless, there are strengths in the leadership of science. In September, new teachers took on the leadership of English and mathematics and they have good plans which have the potential to enable them to make a positive impact on these subjects throughout the school. Governance is satisfactory and shows good potential. There have been many changes to the membership of the governing body in recent years. Governors have developed their awareness of their role and improved the way they carry it out. They have effective ways of finding out how well the school is doing and they raise relevant questions.

p.7

Grade: 3

They have undertaken training and they receive appropriate information from the headteacher. Governors and headteacher work in a good partnership and share a determination to improve the school. 5 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006 .

p.7

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 1 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

The School Council Crosscrake CofE Primary School Stainton Kendal Cumbria LA8 0LB 15 November 2006 Dear Councillors As you know, I came to your school recently, with Alan Keenleyside, to find out how well all the children are learning. Everyone made us welcome and helped us to find out about your school. I was especially grateful to the children who talked to Alan and me about school and their work. Please thank them for us. This letter tells you what I found out. Please make sure that all the children know what it says. Since the last time inspectors came, five years ago, your school has been through some ups and downs and some things are not as good as they were. You are now getting a satisfactory education and things are improving. The grown ups know what should be better and I am sure they can do what is needed. So it looks as if you have a bright future. These are the things that are good at your school:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

• you rarely miss school. You seem to enjoy learning and you all get on well together • you are well-behaved and you get on with your work. In some lessons children work extremely hard • some of the teaching is really good, especially in the junior classes • the school takes good care of you all. The staff make sure that children who find things hard get the extra help they need • Mrs Fletcher has not been at Crosscrake very long but she has already found out a lot about the school and begun to make it better. I have asked the staff and governors to do some things to help you get a better education. • Make sure you do better in writing by the end of Year 2. • Keep a check on how well you are learning as you move up the school. Then they will know if everyone is doing as well as they can. • Help the teachers who are subject leaders to make work in every subject as good as it can possibly be. • Make sure work in all subjects is planned to get harder as you get older.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

I’m sure you will help with ideas about how to improve your school. You have my best wishes for the future. I hope you do as well as you can at Crosscrake and when you move on to secondary school. Yours sincerely Pat Kime Her Majesty’s Inspector of Schools 9 Inspection Report: Crosscrake C of E Primary School, 14 °15 November 2006

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion